( * ) ( * )

( * ) ( * ) — CS2 Stats

76561199662221670[U:1:1701955942]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,755Tracked matches48%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating13,884Blue band · top ~34.3% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 18 days played since 28 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,884 +1,255 28 Aug22 Sept · 18 days played
11,84116,296peak 16,29628 Aug22 Sept
16,470Peak Premier in tracked matches
851Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
18Days played since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 851
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 50 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,412 below peak (16,296)
  • +1,255 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 1,116 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG( * ) ( * )PREMIER13,884 · Blue bandPEAK ELO851csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning50
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD504010Last 10050%Win rateLWWLTWLTTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +3.5pp headshot accuracy · −40ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Last 10

  • 343 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Last 20

  • 695 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility5.7
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch5.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 46% on T to 30% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning5.0
Utility5.7
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact4.3

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time532ms+6ms
first ⅓ avg 526ms → last ⅓ avg 532ms
Headshot accuracy18.7%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 5–13 · ancient, 13 Sept
60%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · nuke, 14 Sept
313msFastest reaction time · 1–7 · dust2, 20 Sept
13–4Biggest win · anubis, 18 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
96In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 6infernoWeakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2091145%-0.02
nukeA1810856%-0.02
mirageB179853%-0.03
ancientB157847%0.03
infernoC125742%-0.00
anubisC94544%-0.02
cacheS64267%-0.01
train21150%0.02
office110100%-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

71Matches
48%Win rate
0.81Avg K/D
70.4ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22654%0.9014.2
Mirage2446%0.7111.8
Ancient944%0.9014.7
Inferno520%0.7112.4
Anubis333%0.679.3
Nuke2100%1.0619.5
Overpass1100%0.7915.0
Cache10%0.7512.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.2%Spray accuracy
74.0%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
543msReaction time
46.0%T opening success
30.3%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
8.1%Flash assists
10.08HE damage / grenade
11.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4683 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 30.27% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno1–7-0.0630%22 Sept
ancient16–130.0319%22 Sept
cache13–6-0.029%22 Sept
ancient10–130.0213%22 Sept
dust212–12-0.0921%22 Sept
dust213–50.0418%22 Sept
ancient10–13-0.036%22 Sept
dust215–15-0.0219%21 Sept
ancient12–120.0418%21 Sept
dust21–7-0.0629%20 Sept
nuke13–70.0416%20 Sept
mirage11–130.0019%20 Sept
anubis1–13-0.047%19 Sept
mirage3–13-0.060%19 Sept
anubis13–100.0539%19 Sept
dust29–13-0.0319%19 Sept
cache12–120.0719%18 Sept
dust212–16-0.0413%18 Sept
mirage12–12-0.068%18 Sept
inferno13–100.017%18 Sept
nuke12–12-0.0220%18 Sept
mirage3–110.0227%18 Sept
anubis13–40.0921%18 Sept
dust26–130.0414%18 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0633%16 Sept
nuke12–120.0119%15 Sept
ancient13–50.0318%15 Sept
dust213–100.0024%15 Sept
anubis5–13-0.0910%15 Sept
cache13–11-0.0512%15 Sept
inferno14–160.0311%15 Sept
nuke3–13-0.0260%14 Sept
ancient9–130.0618%14 Sept
inferno14–16-0.0014%14 Sept
dust213–9-0.0527%14 Sept
dust212–12-0.067%13 Sept
ancient5–130.1617%13 Sept
anubis10–13-0.076%13 Sept
mirage13–110.0113%13 Sept
nuke13–90.0320%13 Sept
nuke13–8-0.0015%13 Sept
mirage13–16-0.047%13 Sept
ancient13–80.0015%13 Sept
mirage13–80.027%13 Sept
dust213–90.0116%13 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0529%12 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0718%12 Sept
inferno13–80.0313%12 Sept
cache3–13-0.0413%12 Sept
office13–10-0.0950%12 Sept
inferno13–50.050%12 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0615%12 Sept
mirage11–130.0115%12 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0418%12 Sept
train3–13-0.0711%12 Sept
dust211–13-0.0724%11 Sept
mirage16–14-0.0714%11 Sept
ancient13–6-0.0419%11 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0423%11 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0114%8 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0328%8 Sept
inferno16–140.0215%8 Sept
dust213–50.0113%8 Sept
mirage16–13-0.009%8 Sept
dust213–40.047%8 Sept
nuke16–12-0.0313%7 Sept
ancient1–13-0.0517%7 Sept
dust213–11-0.0325%7 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0526%7 Sept
mirage16–12-0.0412%7 Sept
inferno7–130.0424%7 Sept
dust213–90.0413%6 Sept
ancient13–90.1315%6 Sept
train13–60.1019%6 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0418%5 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0415%5 Sept
ancient8–130.0417%5 Sept
inferno12–12-0.0141%5 Sept
cache13–90.0119%5 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0211%5 Sept
mirage13–4-0.038%5 Sept
nuke13–80.0018%4 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0130%4 Sept
anubis13–90.079%4 Sept
inferno13–9-0.019%4 Sept
dust29–13-0.057%4 Sept
ancient8–130.0114%4 Sept
ancient13–40.0511%4 Sept
nuke13–110.059%4 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0316%1 Sept
nuke13–6-0.0421%1 Sept
nuke13–6-0.0225%1 Sept
dust24–13-0.1013%1 Sept
nuke4–13-0.0716%1 Sept
dust212–120.0319%1 Sept
cache13–8-0.0519%31 Aug
mirage9–13-0.096%31 Aug
dust213–40.028%31 Aug
anubis4–13-0.077%31 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0535%31 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →