ク vacuous

ク vacuous — CS2 Stats

76561198415308768[U:1:455043040]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,213Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating17,971Purple band · top ~16.6% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 32 days played since 20 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,971 -1,764 31 Jul22 Sept · 29 days played
16,89120,111peak 20,11131 Jul22 Sept
Faceit ELO: 839 +0 1 Sept9 Sept · 2 observations
839839peak 8391 Sept9 Sept
20,111Peak Premier in tracked matches
839Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-07-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 839
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 62 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,140 below peak (20,111)
  • +1,080 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,029 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGク vacuousPREMIER17,971 · Purple bandPEAK ELO839csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning56
Utility79

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46495Last 10046%Win rateLWWTLLLTLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +3.2pp headshot accuracy · +28ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 478ms

Last 10

  • 253 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Last 20

  • 794 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.4 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility7.9
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch2.4

Sharp aimerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Utility. Utility score of 79 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.6
Utility7.9
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact6.3

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time509ms−38ms
first ⅓ avg 547ms → last ⅓ avg 509ms
Headshot accuracy25.3%+4.0%
first ⅓ avg 21.3% → last ⅓ avg 25.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 13–5 · ancient, 15 Sept
67%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · office, 12 Sept
352msFastest reaction time · 2–9 · inferno, 26 Jul
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 26 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
810In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 77% over 13nukeWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B20101050%0.02
mirageD1861233%0.03
infernoB147750%0.03
ancientB137654%0.03
cacheS1310377%0.05
nukeD123925%0.01
anubisD82625%0.02
office110100%0.14
train1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

87Matches
51%Win rate
1.26Avg K/D
104.3ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2148%1.4019.7
Dust22055%1.6621.7
Inferno838%1.1616.5
Ancient667%1.5619.0
Anubis540%0.9114.0
Nuke367%1.6729.3
Overpass1100%1.3121.0
Cache10%1.1416.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.3%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
80.5%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
502msReaction time
36.9%T opening success
42.6%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
7.3%Flash assists
11.30HE damage / grenade
27.74Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.8902% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno1–7-0.0724%22 Sept
ancient16–130.0012%22 Sept
cache13–60.0217%22 Sept
dust215–150.0728%21 Sept
ancient14–160.0120%20 Sept
anubis1–130.0321%19 Sept
mirage3–130.0226%19 Sept
cache12–120.0535%18 Sept
dust212–160.0124%18 Sept
mirage12–120.0622%18 Sept
ancient13–110.0122%16 Sept
inferno10–130.0419%16 Sept
dust213–7-0.0115%16 Sept
nuke12–120.0919%15 Sept
ancient13–50.2321%15 Sept
dust213–100.0038%15 Sept
anubis5–130.0213%15 Sept
cache13–110.0621%15 Sept
inferno14–16-0.028%15 Sept
mirage13–16-0.0022%13 Sept
ancient13–80.0322%13 Sept
mirage13–80.0638%13 Sept
dust213–90.0427%13 Sept
cache13–80.0935%13 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0856%12 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0029%12 Sept
inferno13–80.0420%12 Sept
cache3–13-0.0719%12 Sept
office13–100.1467%12 Sept
inferno13–50.0234%12 Sept
nuke9–130.0121%12 Sept
mirage11–130.0019%12 Sept
dust211–130.0426%11 Sept
mirage16–140.0720%11 Sept
ancient13–60.0917%11 Sept
cache13–90.0718%10 Sept
mirage13–80.0132%8 Sept
nuke9–130.0016%8 Sept
ancient9–130.0713%6 Sept
mirage11–13-0.037%6 Sept
nuke13–90.0723%6 Sept
dust26–130.0419%6 Sept
inferno13–60.0239%6 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0410%5 Sept
anubis13–110.0613%5 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0121%5 Sept
cache13–90.1430%5 Sept
mirage13–100.1038%5 Sept
mirage13–40.1419%5 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0126%19 Aug
cache13–110.0544%19 Aug
ancient8–130.0129%19 Aug
inferno13–20.1042%19 Aug
ancient7–130.0116%19 Aug
cache13–110.0525%19 Aug
mirage11–130.0422%19 Aug
dust22–13-0.0523%18 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0121%18 Aug
anubis7–130.0121%17 Aug
mirage6–130.1226%17 Aug
inferno13–40.0923%17 Aug
dust28–13-0.0120%17 Aug
dust216–140.0522%16 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0313%15 Aug
cache13–50.0435%15 Aug
nuke7–130.0123%15 Aug
dust28–130.0428%14 Aug
dust215–15-0.0018%14 Aug
nuke13–90.0217%13 Aug
anubis13–80.0611%13 Aug
nuke11–130.0320%13 Aug
dust213–100.0528%11 Aug
inferno13–60.1029%11 Aug
mirage10–130.0216%11 Aug
dust210–13-0.009%11 Aug
cache4–10.0333%11 Aug
cache5–130.0524%10 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0224%10 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0222%9 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0411%9 Aug
anubis9–130.0621%9 Aug
train8–13-0.0121%8 Aug
inferno10–130.0623%6 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0329%6 Aug
dust213–30.1926%5 Aug
nuke13–10-0.007%1 Aug
inferno6–130.0332%1 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0125%1 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0226%31 Jul
mirage11–130.0323%31 Jul
dust26–13-0.0514%31 Jul
nuke8–130.0022%31 Jul
dust213–8-0.0113%31 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0523%27 Jul
cache16–130.0320%26 Jul
dust213–6-0.0119%26 Jul
inferno2–90.0634%26 Jul
dust213–20.0530%26 Jul
dust213–10.0315%26 Jul
ancient13–100.0418%20 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →