Ethan

Ethan — CS2 Stats

US76561199568936545[U:1:1608670817]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

853Tracked matches40%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating15,000Purple band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#19092 of 30716 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEthanFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER15,000 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning48
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52462Last 10052%Win rateLLWLWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.4
Aggression5.6
Utility3.8
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch6.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning4.8
Utility3.8
Mechanics4.8
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time538ms−77ms
first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 538ms
Headshot accuracy13.2%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 11.4% → last ⅓ avg 13.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — dust2 13–8
131Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
67In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 63% over 19nukeWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA1912763%-0.01
dust2A1911858%0.00
mirageB179853%0.00
ancientB157847%0.00
nukeD124833%-0.00
anubisB105550%-0.00
infernoB84450%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

15Matches
60%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
85.4ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
36%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient875%1.0817.1
Nuke2100%1.1016.0
Anubis20%0.6410.5
Train1100%1.6436.0
Inferno10%1.1721.0
Mirage10%0.9223.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.2%Headshot accuracy
38.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.1%Spray accuracy
71.5%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
536msReaction time
31.5%T opening success
47.1%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
3.5%Flash assists
7.32HE damage / grenade
4.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.1605% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4397 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.4982% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–13-0.0116%28 Aug
cache1–13-0.0512%28 Aug
ancient16–140.1114%28 Aug
anubis11–13-0.000%27 Aug
mirage13–50.049%27 Aug
cache4–130.0017%26 Aug
nuke13–90.079%26 Aug
dust23–13-0.049%25 Aug
anubis13–90.049%25 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0413%25 Aug
cache10–13-0.0110%24 Aug
mirage8–130.0021%24 Aug
mirage10–13-0.067%24 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0010%23 Aug
mirage13–2-0.0119%23 Aug
cache13–2-0.015%23 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0312%23 Aug
cache13–9-0.049%23 Aug
dust21–13-0.116%23 Aug
nuke5–130.0244%23 Aug
nuke7–13-0.008%23 Aug
ancient13–70.0718%23 Aug
dust21–70.0033%23 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0214%22 Aug
dust213–110.0116%22 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0826%22 Aug
dust28–13-0.0312%21 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0611%20 Aug
inferno13–30.068%20 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0113%19 Aug
mirage16–120.0611%18 Aug
nuke13–70.049%18 Aug
ancient14–160.039%17 Aug
dust213–60.0622%17 Aug
cache13–10-0.0223%16 Aug
ancient13–7-0.035%16 Aug
ancient13–80.0111%16 Aug
nuke7–130.0112%16 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0113%16 Aug
cache13–7-0.0318%15 Aug
cache10–13-0.0313%15 Aug
dust213–70.0214%14 Aug
anubis5–13-0.022%13 Aug
cache13–5-0.0019%13 Aug
dust213–9-0.0324%12 Aug
cache8–13-0.017%12 Aug
inferno13–5-0.037%11 Aug
anubis13–90.016%11 Aug
ancient13–50.0418%10 Aug
anubis4–13-0.058%10 Aug
cache13–60.029%9 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0714%9 Aug
anubis13–110.0115%9 Aug
ancient4–13-0.038%8 Aug
mirage8–130.0216%8 Aug
ancient8–130.0610%8 Aug
nuke11–130.0024%6 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0612%6 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0210%5 Aug
inferno10–13-0.074%5 Aug
ancient9–13-0.039%5 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0513%4 Aug
anubis13–16-0.024%3 Aug
ancient9–13-0.026%3 Aug
dust21–13-0.0215%2 Aug
cache7–13-0.0014%2 Aug
cache13–40.0314%2 Aug
anubis13–40.094%2 Aug
nuke11–13-0.053%2 Aug
ancient13–80.014%2 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0411%31 Jul
ancient11–13-0.059%30 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0416%29 Jul
mirage13–50.0311%29 Jul
dust213–110.0114%28 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0411%28 Jul
inferno16–13-0.0314%27 Jul
cache13–9-0.076%27 Jul
dust22–13-0.044%26 Jul
mirage13–70.0311%26 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0517%26 Jul
cache13–60.046%26 Jul
dust23–13-0.0416%25 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0017%24 Jul
dust213–50.0813%23 Jul
dust213–80.1321%23 Jul
inferno6–130.0317%21 Jul
dust213–50.039%21 Jul
inferno4–130.0610%20 Jul
dust213–110.008%18 Jul
dust213–80.0012%17 Jul
mirage13–80.0111%17 Jul
cache13–40.015%15 Jul
mirage13–10.077%14 Jul
nuke3–130.0422%13 Jul
cache13–80.0115%12 Jul
dust212–120.038%12 Jul
cache9–13-0.0113%9 Jul
cache13–3-0.0122%6 Jul
dust213–9-0.048%4 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →