Lucas666-_-

Lucas666-_- — CS2 Stats

FK76561199564661979[U:1:1604396251]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,191Tracked matches40%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating14,894Blue band · top ~29% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6 · 895 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,894 -190 3 Sept – 13 Nov · 14 days played
14,89415,661peak 15,6613 Sept13 Nov
Faceit ELO: 895 +0 3 Sept – 24 Sept · 2 observations
895895peak 8953 Sept24 Sept
15,892Peak Premier in tracked matches
895Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-09-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 895
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 — 6 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 767 below peak (15,661)
  • -352 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 106 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLucas666-_-FACEITLevel 6 · 895 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER14,894 · Blue bandPEAK ELO895csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57
Positioning56
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD39–59–2Last 10039%Win rateLLLLWLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −3.4pp headshot accuracy · +39ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 619ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim5.7
Utility4.3
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 58% on T to 43% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 585ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7
Positioning5.6
Utility4.3
Mechanics3.5
Opening Duels5.1
Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time579ms+25ms
first ⅓ avg 554ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy20.9%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 21.6% → last ⅓ avg 20.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–2 · anubis, 30 Sept →
39%Best headshot accuracy · 14–16 · inferno, 8 Oct →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · mirage, 7 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 28 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
L4Current streak
7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 55% over 11ancientWeakest map · 28% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2411–1346%-0.01
mirageC239–1439%-0.01
ancientD185–1328%-0.02
nukeA116–555%-0.00
infernoD103–730%0.00
anubisD93–633%-0.02
cache—42–250%-0.01
vertigo—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (28% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

669Matches
50%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
78.6ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage16649%0.9015.2
Dust212650%0.8714.3
Ancient10251%0.9715.8
Anubis8146%0.9815.8
Inferno7949%0.9514.5
Nuke5657%1.0716.2
Cache4257%0.9816.3
Overpass1040%0.7914.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy
30.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.5%Spray accuracy
65.6%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
585msReaction time
58.3%T opening success
42.7%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
3.82HE damage / grenade
8.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

28% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno5–130.0116%13 Nov →
nuke8–13-0.0132%10 Nov →
mirage11–13-0.0112%9 Nov →
mirage4–130.0217%7 Nov →
nuke13–6-0.0322%1 Nov →
inferno5–9-0.0224%1 Nov →
nuke13–60.0124%1 Nov →
mirage14–16-0.0320%30 Oct →
ancient5–130.0117%29 Oct →
mirage13–80.0623%29 Oct →
dust212–16-0.0325%29 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0620%28 Oct →
dust27–130.0313%28 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0128%28 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0432%28 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0126%27 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0730%26 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0412%25 Oct →
nuke13–110.0529%25 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0125%21 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0211%21 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0114%19 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0327%19 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0412%19 Oct →
anubis13–50.0313%19 Oct →
mirage13–40.0123%19 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0320%19 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.1014%19 Oct →
mirage13–50.0018%17 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0523%16 Oct →
ancient13–20.0329%16 Oct →
vertigo6–13-0.0412%16 Oct →
dust213–90.0130%16 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0125%16 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0423%16 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0221%16 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0424%16 Oct →
ancient13–80.0514%13 Oct →
dust213–60.0214%13 Oct →
mirage13–60.0214%13 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0210%13 Oct →
mirage7–130.0430%13 Oct →
ancient13–80.019%13 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0612%12 Oct →
mirage13–100.0118%12 Oct →
ancient16–14-0.0116%12 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0418%12 Oct →
mirage0–13-0.0811%12 Oct →
anubis16–130.0117%11 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0719%11 Oct →
nuke13–90.0118%11 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0924%11 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0130%11 Oct →
dust24–13-0.049%11 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0222%11 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0125%10 Oct →
inferno14–160.0739%8 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0422%8 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0513%8 Oct →
inferno11–130.0317%8 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0416%8 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0210%7 Oct →
dust29–130.0214%7 Oct →
mirage13–110.0523%7 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0433%7 Oct →
mirage10–130.0316%7 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0013%6 Oct →
ancient10–130.0317%6 Oct →
inferno13–60.0118%6 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0514%6 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.077%6 Oct →
inferno13–90.0034%6 Oct →
ancient2–13-0.0723%5 Oct →
ancient13–16-0.0617%5 Oct →
inferno8–130.0126%5 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0610%4 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0017%2 Oct →
inferno12–50.0617%2 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0325%2 Oct →
cache15–150.0024%2 Oct →
cache19–170.0021%2 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0625%2 Oct →
nuke13–90.0428%1 Oct →
ancient9–130.0030%1 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0722%30 Sept →
dust210–130.0026%30 Sept →
anubis13–20.0921%30 Sept →
mirage13–110.0821%30 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0134%30 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0226%30 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0639%30 Sept →
dust213–60.0726%30 Sept →
nuke15–150.0522%28 Sept →
dust213–1-0.019%28 Sept →
dust213–50.0621%28 Sept →
mirage23–250.0010%28 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0617%28 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0510%27 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0618%26 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0238%26 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.