MuUni — CS2 Stats

76561198021581090[U:1:61315362]

1,668Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating14,892Blue band · top ~29% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#20815 of 33187 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMuUniFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER14,892 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning49
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55441Last 10055%Win rateWLWLLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.0
Aggression5.7
Utility5.7
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.1° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 621ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning4.9
Utility5.7
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time632ms−53ms
first ⅓ avg 685ms → last ⅓ avg 632ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%+1.7%
first ⅓ avg 15.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — ancient 13–1
131Biggest win — ancient
4Longest win streak
95In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 82% over 11anubisWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA31171455%-0.01
dust2B30141647%-0.00
ancientB126650%0.02
infernoS119282%0.02
anubisC52340%-0.02
nuke43175%0.02
cache31233%0.00
vertigo220100%0.05
overpass21150%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

90Matches
48%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
69.1ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2941%0.8913.0
Dust21741%0.9111.9
Ancient1040%0.8814.1
Anubis933%0.7212.7
Inferno771%1.0315.6
Nuke650%1.4119.0
Cache475%1.3214.8
Overpass10%1.0716.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.4%Headshot accuracy
40.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.9%Spray accuracy
86.2%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
621msReaction time
37.6%T opening success
35.3%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
9.43HE damage / grenade
10.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.6395% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–50.0320%29 Aug
dust26–13-0.0121%29 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0113%29 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0317%29 Aug
dust25–13-0.0433%29 Aug
dust210–13-0.0516%26 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0017%26 Aug
vertigo16–130.0417%26 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0713%26 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0119%26 Aug
dust213–7-0.018%24 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0019%24 Aug
ancient11–130.0520%21 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0012%21 Aug
mirage7–13-0.019%21 Aug
mirage13–50.008%21 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0522%17 Aug
mirage13–90.0216%17 Aug
ancient3–130.0224%17 Aug
dust213–90.0218%17 Aug
ancient10–130.0320%14 Aug
dust213–10-0.0627%14 Aug
inferno13–20.0713%14 Aug
mirage13–6-0.053%14 Aug
inferno13–110.0217%10 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0219%10 Aug
ancient13–70.0614%10 Aug
vertigo9–50.0532%10 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0212%8 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0013%8 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0111%8 Aug
dust213–30.1128%8 Aug
anubis22–20-0.0415%3 Aug
inferno16–130.0214%3 Aug
dust26–13-0.018%3 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0421%3 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0310%1 Aug
mirage13–110.0814%1 Aug
dust213–100.0310%1 Aug
mirage13–9-0.063%27 Jul
mirage13–60.0313%27 Jul
mirage7–13-0.076%25 Jul
dust213–70.1244%25 Jul
dust29–130.0323%25 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0126%25 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0417%22 Jul
dust213–11-0.0532%22 Jul
cache3–13-0.0114%20 Jul
ancient17–190.0013%20 Jul
dust24–13-0.0014%20 Jul
inferno9–30.1310%20 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0216%19 Jul
inferno13–100.0224%19 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0910%19 Jul
dust213–4-0.048%19 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0212%19 Jul
cache9–130.0216%15 Jul
dust213–90.0119%15 Jul
dust216–14-0.0113%15 Jul
dust27–13-0.0229%15 Jul
nuke13–70.0924%13 Jul
mirage14–160.0514%13 Jul
ancient13–6-0.069%13 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0114%13 Jul
dust27–130.0314%10 Jul
inferno13–90.058%8 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0513%8 Jul
cache13–100.0115%8 Jul
mirage9–13-0.007%8 Jul
dust213–3-0.0121%8 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0232%6 Jul
overpass10–13-0.0313%6 Jul
dust210–13-0.0214%6 Jul
dust27–13-0.0116%6 Jul
mirage13–50.0823%3 Jul
ancient13–10.1719%3 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0415%3 Jul
dust213–90.0221%3 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0211%30 Jun
dust26–13-0.0512%30 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0416%30 Jun
overpass13–70.079%30 Jun
dust26–13-0.0611%30 Jun
mirage13–90.0021%30 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0110%26 Jun
dust25–13-0.0221%26 Jun
ancient13–20.0516%26 Jun
dust213–110.0314%26 Jun
dust210–130.0225%24 Jun
mirage8–130.0419%24 Jun
anubis13–30.062%24 Jun
mirage16–120.0214%24 Jun
nuke8–130.0313%24 Jun
dust215–15-0.0316%22 Jun
mirage13–90.016%22 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0420%22 Jun
dust213–4-0.0113%22 Jun
ancient13–20.0221%22 Jun
dust26–13-0.0815%19 Jun
mirage13–80.0012%19 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →