501dmg — CS2 Stats

76561199554971471[U:1:1594705743]

2,090Tracked matches53%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,210 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG501dmgFACEITLevel 9 · 2,210 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning64
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT65332Last 10065%Win rateLWWWWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.06 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.9
Aggression8.8
Utility5.4
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.4
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning6.4
Utility5.4
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time554ms−87ms
first ⅓ avg 641ms → last ⅓ avg 554ms
Headshot accuracy22.4%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 24.2% → last ⅓ avg 22.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.28Best rating — mirage 8–0
130Biggest win — nuke
9Longest win streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 100% over 8anubisWeakest map · 50% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS2315865%0.01
mirageA2112957%0.02
dust2S2114767%0.00
ancientA169756%0.01
nukeS880100%0.02
anubisB63350%-0.01
cache32167%-0.00
overpass220100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,215Matches
51%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
82.5ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage26347%1.0215.6
Inferno23956%1.1016.3
Anubis20250%1.1217.2
Dust218351%1.1316.6
Ancient16648%1.0316.7
Nuke10354%1.1917.0
Train4240%0.9615.2
Overpass1362%1.0415.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.4%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.3%Spray accuracy
86.1%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
549msReaction time
39.5%T opening success
55.7%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
6.00HE damage / grenade
10.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.4676% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage3–8-0.050%27 Aug
mirage13–90.0826%27 Aug
ancient13–20.0840%27 Aug
dust213–3-0.0135%27 Aug
inferno13–100.0422%27 Aug
ancient13–20.1719%26 Aug
mirage13–100.0622%26 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0019%24 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0238%24 Aug
ancient7–00.0717%23 Aug
dust28–130.0217%23 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0112%23 Jul
inferno1–13-0.0026%12 May
ancient8–13-0.0420%8 May
inferno9–13-0.0316%7 May
dust213–7-0.0233%7 May
inferno7–13-0.0518%7 May
ancient6–13-0.0517%6 May
cache13–40.0210%6 May
inferno13–60.0114%6 May
inferno13–90.0319%6 May
inferno16–14-0.0127%5 May
dust213–20.0019%5 May
ancient16–140.0822%5 May
inferno13–110.0732%5 May
mirage12–16-0.0327%4 May
ancient11–13-0.0422%3 May
inferno9–13-0.0429%3 May
mirage4–130.0426%2 May
inferno1–13-0.1022%30 Apr
inferno13–100.0030%30 Apr
cache13–50.0224%29 Apr
cache11–13-0.0521%29 Apr
ancient13–90.0019%29 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0420%28 Apr
ancient13–60.0031%26 Apr
mirage13–110.0529%24 Apr
ancient13–90.0113%23 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0627%21 Apr
inferno13–5-0.0220%21 Apr
mirage13–30.0326%21 Apr
mirage9–130.0120%21 Apr
dust23–13-0.1038%21 Apr
dust213–11-0.0122%21 Apr
dust29–130.0233%20 Apr
anubis4–13-0.0611%20 Apr
ancient3–13-0.106%20 Apr
dust213–5-0.0215%20 Apr
mirage16–120.0022%19 Apr
nuke13–5-0.0421%19 Apr
mirage13–4-0.0337%19 Apr
nuke2–00.08100%19 Apr
nuke13–0-0.0244%19 Apr
inferno13–20.0633%19 Apr
ancient13–60.0226%19 Apr
ancient13–160.0324%19 Apr
inferno13–100.0228%18 Apr
overpass13–40.0341%18 Apr
ancient13–40.0731%18 Apr
dust213–10.0934%18 Apr
mirage13–30.0143%18 Apr
anubis7–13-0.078%18 Apr
ancient3–130.0229%17 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0520%17 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0522%17 Apr
mirage11–130.0121%16 Apr
anubis13–100.0119%16 Apr
dust24–13-0.0324%16 Apr
dust213–8-0.0525%16 Apr
mirage13–60.0523%16 Apr
overpass13–10.0011%16 Apr
nuke13–70.0524%16 Apr
dust211–13-0.0516%16 Apr
inferno13–40.1232%15 Apr
nuke13–10.1020%15 Apr
dust213–6-0.0222%15 Apr
dust211–13-0.0127%14 Apr
anubis13–60.0025%14 Apr
nuke13–90.0627%14 Apr
inferno13–100.0619%14 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0311%14 Apr
dust213–50.0629%14 Apr
dust28–13-0.0319%14 Apr
inferno13–50.0316%14 Apr
dust213–80.0229%13 Apr
ancient15–15-0.1023%13 Apr
inferno13–00.0917%13 Apr
mirage12–120.0421%13 Apr
dust213–00.0150%13 Apr
mirage4–130.0133%13 Apr
mirage8–13-0.1214%12 Apr
mirage8–00.2824%12 Apr
dust213–40.0126%12 Apr
dust213–00.1248%12 Apr
inferno13–60.0521%12 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0017%12 Apr
anubis13–30.0832%12 Apr
inferno13–30.0223%11 Apr
mirage13–100.0322%11 Apr
dust213–50.0128%11 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →