CRAZY GORILLA

CRAZY GORILLA — CS2 Stats

SV76561199554887377[U:1:1594621649]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

587Tracked matches59%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,110Hours in CS23Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating16,756Purple band · top ~21.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,097 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 36 days played since 4 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,756 +20 4 Jun16 Sept · 17 days played
13,41718,437peak 18,4374 Jun16 Sept
18,437Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,097Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-06-04

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,097
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 104 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-11
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-11

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,681 below peak (18,437)
  • -1,681 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 3,244 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-11
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-11

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches25
Win rate68%
K/D1.44
Headshot %47%

Measured 11 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,393), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate37.6%44.8%45.7%8.2% short
Shot accuracy0.4%12.4%12.7%12.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.001.041.050.05 short
Match win rate50.3%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCRAZY GORILLAFACEITLevel 6 · 1,097 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER16,756 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,097csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning72
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56386Last 10056%Win rateLLLWWLTWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · −0.06 avg rating · −4.9pp headshot accuracy · +68ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 484ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 495ms

Last 20

  • 1361 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 461ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility5.1
Positioning7.2
Opening Duels5.7
Clutch2.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 63% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning7.2
Utility5.1
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels7.1
Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time481ms−78ms
first ⅓ avg 559ms → last ⅓ avg 481ms
Headshot accuracy22.1%+6.6%
first ⅓ avg 15.5% → last ⅓ avg 22.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.28Best match rating · 9–3 · vertigo, 16 Jul
56%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · warden, 3 Jul
297msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · mirage, 12 Sept
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 12 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L3Current streak
44In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 67% over 18anubisWeakest map · 43% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA23131057%0.00
nukeB21111052%0.03
mirageS1812667%0.03
anubisC146843%0.01
cacheB84450%0.02
vertigo440100%0.09
inferno42250%0.01
dust243175%0.05
overpass21150%-0.01
office1010%0.12
warden1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

21,622Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
1,488Matches
50.3%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 6 players
37.6%Headshot %
0.4%Shot accuracy
3,513MVPs
611Hours (in match)
1,648Bombs planted
340Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,593nuke
1,988inferno
1,131dust2
1,101vertigo
630office
204train
48italy
8ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

95Matches
57%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
87.3ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2945%0.9814.1
Ancient1656%1.2817.4
Nuke1362%1.1917.3
Dust21250%0.9714.8
Anubis1275%1.0417.4
Overpass786%1.5117.9
Inferno650%1.1416.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.4%Spray accuracy
77.5%Counter-strafing
7.0°Preaim
484msReaction time
62.5%T opening success
54.0%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
12.82HE damage / grenade
9.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4364 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke3–130.0224%16 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0525%16 Sept
cache11–130.0523%13 Sept
ancient13–40.0523%13 Sept
cache13–100.0124%13 Sept
nuke11–130.0316%12 Sept
office12–120.1237%12 Sept
vertigo13–10-0.0321%12 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0614%12 Sept
inferno9–1-0.0425%12 Sept
nuke9–20.1533%12 Sept
mirage13–70.0127%12 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0424%12 Sept
nuke9–30.1923%12 Sept
nuke9–50.0921%12 Sept
nuke9–30.0443%12 Sept
ancient13–30.0245%12 Sept
dust213–40.0224%12 Sept
mirage13–30.1017%12 Sept
mirage13–10.1126%12 Sept
mirage13–80.1713%12 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0118%11 Sept
ancient13–60.0628%11 Sept
anubis13–60.1112%9 Sept
nuke13–70.0819%9 Sept
cache13–50.0830%9 Sept
ancient13–110.0311%7 Sept
ancient5–130.0211%6 Sept
anubis5–130.0515%6 Sept
ancient6–130.0416%6 Sept
mirage16–140.0516%6 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0414%6 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0310%5 Sept
nuke1–13-0.0940%5 Sept
nuke13–100.0217%2 Sept
ancient13–50.0617%2 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0613%29 Aug
cache13–60.0320%28 Aug
mirage13–90.0111%28 Aug
nuke13–50.0314%28 Aug
ancient2–13-0.095%24 Aug
nuke13–3-0.0011%24 Aug
mirage13–20.0618%24 Aug
cache12–12-0.0710%24 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0215%24 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0221%22 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0421%22 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0328%15 Aug
ancient13–30.0615%15 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0020%15 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0410%13 Aug
dust213–90.0511%11 Aug
inferno5–9-0.0442%10 Aug
vertigo13–70.0914%5 Aug
mirage6–130.0114%4 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0614%31 Jul
nuke13–9-0.026%30 Jul
dust211–130.0733%16 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0414%16 Jul
ancient13–100.0213%16 Jul
vertigo9–30.2819%16 Jul
nuke8–8-0.0415%16 Jul
anubis11–4-0.006%16 Jul
anubis11–130.0614%14 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0710%14 Jul
anubis6–130.0017%13 Jul
inferno5–90.1143%13 Jul
anubis5–130.0420%10 Jul
nuke15–150.0113%10 Jul
vertigo9–30.0213%10 Jul
warden1–13-0.0656%3 Jul
cache13–80.0119%3 Jul
nuke8–80.1038%3 Jul
ancient13–2-0.0315%2 Jul
nuke8–130.0720%28 Jun
nuke16–140.0317%28 Jun
ancient13–6-0.058%28 Jun
anubis1–10-0.0412%28 Jun
cache10–13-0.0219%17 Jun
cache12–120.1118%13 Jun
inferno9–6-0.0029%13 Jun
mirage13–90.0924%12 Jun
mirage13–90.0515%11 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0317%11 Jun
ancient13–2-0.013%11 Jun
nuke6–13-0.058%11 Jun
ancient13–20.0311%9 Jun
anubis13–20.0112%9 Jun
mirage13–80.0113%9 Jun
ancient13–70.0212%9 Jun
anubis6–13-0.102%8 Jun
anubis13–60.0915%7 Jun
ancient8–130.0812%7 Jun
dust213–90.048%7 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0312%4 Jun
nuke13–100.089%4 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0215%4 Jun
overpass13–30.005%4 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0213%4 Jun
overpass13–16-0.0313%4 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →