Perry d´ Gooner

Perry d´ Gooner — CS2 Stats

76561199530811806[U:1:1570546078]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

130Tracked matches59%Win rate2025Tracked since
212Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating22,521Top 25% of 212,379 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#49702 of 259340 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Sep 2026 (37 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

22,521Peak Premier in tracked matches
61Days played since 2026-02-05

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 22,521
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,479 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=38,294), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianRed band medianvs Red band
Headshot rate51.3%46.9%49.3%above
Shot accuracy0.7%13.0%13.4%12.6% short
Kill/death ratio2.201.081.12above
Match win rate59.4%46.7%48.5%above

This profile matches the typical Red band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Red band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPerry d´ GoonerPREMIER22,521 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning54
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT58–37–5Last 10058%Win rateWWWTLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.06 avg rating · −0.7pp headshot accuracy · −73ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Last 10

  • 7–2–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 525ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+4.3 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility4.8
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch10.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning5.4
Utility4.8
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time551ms−97ms
first ⅓ avg 647ms → last ⅓ avg 551ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%+3.0%
first ⅓ avg 15.5% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.42Best match rating · 9–2 · inferno, 15 Apr →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 4–9 · inferno, 15 Apr →
406msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · office, 2 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · office, 29 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
3–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

officeBest map · 83% over 6anubisWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA1911–858%0.03
infernoA159–660%0.09
dust2B126–650%0.02
cacheC104–640%0.04
vertigoS97–278%0.04
anubisC83–538%0.03
officeS65–183%0.05
trainS54–180%0.07
poseidon—43–175%0.15
overpass—32–167%0.03
sanctum—31–233%-0.00
nuke—22–0100%0.03
italy—20–20%0.07
alpine—21–150%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

20,606Lifetime kills
2.20K/D · Top 5% of Pink band
941Matches
59.4%Match win rate · Top 5% of Pink band
51.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Pink band
0.7%Shot accuracy
4,047MVPs
212Hours (in match)
919Bombs planted
400Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,404inferno
1,192dust2
592nuke
563vertigo
269train
218office
29italy
25lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

5Matches
40%Win rate
1.57Avg K/D
100.7ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

100%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage333%1.3119.0
Anubis10%2.0032.0
Cache1100%1.9121.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy
39.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.2%Spray accuracy
79.9%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
535msReaction time
39.0%T opening success
51.0%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
2.4%Flash assists
8.04HE damage / grenade
6.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.0343% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office13–10.0919%29 Oct →
office13–8-0.0128%28 Oct →
cache13–90.0327%21 Oct →
cache12–120.1318%21 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0113%14 Oct →
mirage13–40.0720%13 Oct →
dust28–130.0511%9 Oct →
dust213–100.0422%9 Oct →
dust213–110.0622%9 Oct →
mirage13–60.1717%5 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0227%3 Oct →
dust213–30.0724%1 Oct →
overpass13–30.097%1 Oct →
mirage13–30.0821%30 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0325%29 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0323%29 Sept →
nuke13–60.0030%28 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0613%27 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0423%27 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0312%26 Sept →
mirage13–40.1114%25 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0316%25 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0116%25 Sept →
nuke13–40.0515%24 Sept →
vertigo13–20.0322%23 Sept →
vertigo12–10.009%23 Sept →
anubis10–130.0419%16 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0917%9 Sept →
inferno8–130.0922%2 Sept →
office4–130.0119%2 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0213%26 Aug →
mirage8–130.0518%19 Aug →
train13–50.0610%13 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0415%5 Aug →
dust213–60.016%3 Aug →
inferno13–70.1023%3 Aug →
vertigo13–90.0221%29 Jul →
anubis4–130.0111%25 Jul →
anubis2–13-0.079%22 Jul →
anubis12–120.0717%20 Jul →
dust213–30.0626%17 Jul →
vertigo9–130.0516%16 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0311%15 Jul →
office13–50.0325%14 Jul →
cache13–60.068%7 Jul →
mirage13–10.1316%28 Jun →
anubis13–40.0716%10 Jun →
vertigo13–30.1137%3 Jun →
anubis10–130.0817%27 May →
office13–50.1419%14 May →
cache13–80.0714%7 May →
cache5–13-0.0141%6 May →
cache10–130.1120%6 May →
cache13–110.0913%30 Apr →
cache11–130.0116%29 Apr →
train13–90.1025%22 Apr →
train13–40.0613%22 Apr →
train8–130.0130%17 Apr →
poseidon9–10.2725%15 Apr →
poseidon9–40.0421%15 Apr →
inferno3–90.017%15 Apr →
inferno4–90.0826%15 Apr →
inferno9–20.1717%15 Apr →
inferno3–90.0118%15 Apr →
inferno9–20.4225%15 Apr →
inferno4–9-0.1243%15 Apr →
inferno9–60.1116%15 Apr →
dust212–120.0811%10 Apr →
vertigo13–40.0520%8 Apr →
vertigo10–130.039%8 Apr →
anubis13–30.0414%2 Apr →
anubis13–110.0612%1 Apr →
sanctum1–9-0.1514%7 Mar →
poseidon9–10.2425%7 Mar →
train13–80.1110%25 Feb →
mirage10–13-0.048%22 Feb →
inferno13–70.105%13 Feb →
inferno5–1-0.0529%13 Feb →
overpass3–13-0.0713%12 Feb →
mirage4–13-0.0132%12 Feb →
mirage13–80.0421%12 Feb →
vertigo13–70.0319%11 Feb →
vertigo13–70.0317%11 Feb →
sanctum4–9-0.0714%9 Feb →
inferno9–20.2416%9 Feb →
overpass13–90.0711%9 Feb →
mirage13–70.137%9 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0012%8 Feb →
italy9–13-0.0415%8 Feb →
italy1–60.1715%8 Feb →
office8–20.039%8 Feb →
poseidon6–90.0722%8 Feb →
sanctum9–30.218%8 Feb →
inferno9–00.1943%8 Feb →
mirage13–30.0118%8 Feb →
inferno11–13-0.0212%7 Feb →
alpine13–70.0612%6 Feb →
dust212–12-0.0114%5 Feb →
alpine12–120.0615%5 Feb →
inferno13–30.029%5 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.