ROXX-chan — CS2 Stats
CA76561199528109145[U:1:1567843417]Steam profile ↗1 game ban
What changed since last observed
CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Oct 2026 (18 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.
No change since then — still 78 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.
Rating over time
Premier CS Rating
- At peak — 33,220
- +2,708 over 30 days · improving
- Reached: Gold band · Red band · Pink band · Purple band
- Gold band first seen 2026-10-26
- Red band first seen 2026-10-26
Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Gold band among CSDB-tracked players (n=345), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Gold band median |
|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 69.5% | 50.9% |
| Shot accuracy | 0.0% | 11.8% |
| Kill/death ratio | 2.37 | 1.18 |
| Match win rate | 69.5% | 51.9% |
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −10.0pp headshot accuracy · −124ms reaction
Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.
Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches
Last 5
- 5–0 · 100% win rate
- Avg rating 0.12
- Avg headshot accuracy 85%
- Avg reaction 216ms
Last 10
- 10–0 · 100% win rate
- Avg rating 0.13
- Avg headshot accuracy 85%
- Avg reaction 209ms
Last 20
- 20–0 · 100% win rate
- Avg rating 0.14
- Avg headshot accuracy 90%
- Avg reaction 271ms
Newest first, from the last 77 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.
Player DNA
Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).
Sharp aimerStrong T-side openerLimited utility dependence
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.
Your pro match
Plays most like donk 53% playstyle similarity
Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.
Where you differ: lower utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 100 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
T openings. 64% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.
Areas to improve
Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
CT openings. Opening success drops from 64% on T to 42% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.
Counter-strafing. Only 59% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 77 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Personal bests
Across the last 77 tracked matches.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 dust2 | S | 15 | 15–0 | 100% | 0.17 |
 nuke | S | 15 | 14–1 | 93% | 0.13 |
 cache | S | 14 | 13–1 | 93% | 0.17 |
 inferno | S | 9 | 9–0 | 100% | 0.16 |
 ancient | S | 9 | 8–1 | 89% | 0.14 |
 mirage | S | 8 | 8–0 | 100% | 0.13 |
 anubis | S | 5 | 4–1 | 80% | 0.19 |
| golden | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | -0.02 |
 train | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | -0.05 |
Across the last 77 tracked matches.
Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (80% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced MechanicsPractice Config →
Sustained sprays are missing more than they land, which is a recoil-control pattern you can drill directly.
Spray accuracy 0% — below the 20% mark we flag
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dust2 | 13–2 | 0.15 | 90% | 28 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–0 | 0.02 | 80% | 28 Sept → | |
| inferno | 4–0 | 0.17 | 71% | 28 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–0 | 0.18 | 82% | 28 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–0 | 0.07 | 100% | 28 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 13–1 | 0.16 | 94% | 28 Sept → | |
| cache | 13–4 | 0.15 | 89% | 28 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–0 | -0.00 | 57% | 28 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–0 | 0.17 | 86% | 28 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 13–0 | 0.22 | 100% | 28 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–1 | 0.14 | 85% | 28 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–1 | 0.14 | 93% | 28 Sept → | |
| anubis | 13–7 | 0.22 | 100% | 28 Sept → | |
| cache | 13–0 | 0.03 | 100% | 28 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 13–0 | 0.38 | 100% | 28 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 11–2 | 0.18 | 100% | 28 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–0 | 0.13 | 93% | 28 Sept → | |
| cache | 13–0 | 0.19 | 94% | 28 Sept → | |
| ancient | 2–0 | 0.06 | 100% | 28 Sept → | |
| inferno | 13–0 | 0.03 | 86% | 28 Sept → | |
| cache | 13–0 | 0.07 | 92% | 28 Sept → | |
| anubis | 13–2 | 0.13 | 86% | 27 Sept → | |
| anubis | 13–2 | 0.25 | 93% | 27 Sept → | |
| cache | 13–0 | 0.08 | 93% | 27 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 13–0 | 0.11 | 100% | 27 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 13–0 | 0.16 | 100% | 27 Sept → | |
| cache | 13–0 | 0.14 | 100% | 27 Sept → | |
| ancient | 13–0 | 0.04 | 100% | 27 Sept → | |
| ancient | 13–1 | 0.12 | 96% | 27 Sept → | |
| inferno | 13–0 | 0.07 | 100% | 27 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 8–0 | 0.21 | 100% | 27 Sept → | |
| cache | 4–0 | 0.15 | 100% | 27 Sept → | |
| cache | 5–13 | 0.68 | 100% | 27 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 13–1 | 0.18 | 90% | 27 Sept → | |
| ancient | 3–0 | -0.04 | 100% | 27 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–2 | 0.09 | 75% | 27 Sept → | |
| inferno | 13–2 | 0.15 | 94% | 27 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–1 | 0.12 | 63% | 27 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 13–2 | 0.10 | 71% | 26 Sept → | |
| ancient | 2–0 | 0.31 | 100% | 26 Sept → | |
| cache | 13–0 | 0.16 | 58% | 26 Sept → | |
| ancient | 3–1 | 0.30 | 100% | 26 Sept → | |
| inferno | 9–1 | 0.31 | 100% | 26 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–0 | 0.08 | 91% | 25 Sept → | |
| inferno | 13–0 | 0.18 | 96% | 25 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–1 | 0.15 | 89% | 25 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–1 | 0.17 | 94% | 25 Sept → | |
| inferno | 13–0 | 0.07 | 19% | 25 Sept → | |
| mirage | 3–0 | 0.22 | 100% | 25 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–1 | 0.22 | 60% | 25 Sept → | |
| cache | 13–0 | 0.13 | 79% | 25 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–0 | 0.18 | 52% | 25 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 13–0 | 0.03 | 92% | 25 Sept → | |
| cache | 2–3 | 0.16 | 40% | 24 Sept → | |
| ancient | 13–5 | 0.20 | 6% | 24 Sept → | |
| ancient | 13–4 | 0.28 | 67% | 24 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–2 | 0.03 | 85% | 24 Sept → | |
| inferno | 13–3 | 0.30 | 65% | 24 Sept → | |
| cache | 13–2 | 0.33 | 38% | 24 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–3 | 0.16 | 11% | 24 Sept → | |
| cache | 13–6 | 0.10 | 9% | 24 Sept → | |
| anubis | 13–8 | -0.02 | 6% | 24 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–5 | 0.18 | 45% | 24 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 13–0 | 0.22 | 83% | 24 Sept → | |
| cache | 13–7 | 0.06 | 74% | 24 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–2 | 0.23 | 58% | 24 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 13–6 | 0.13 | 21% | 24 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–1 | 0.06 | 46% | 24 Sept → | |
| inferno | 9–0 | 0.19 | 69% | 22 Sept → | |
| nuke | 8–0 | 0.24 | 67% | 22 Sept → | |
| anubis | 11–13 | 0.34 | 84% | 22 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 13–0 | 0.27 | 84% | 22 Sept → | |
| golden | 7–13 | -0.02 | 5% | 6 Nov → | |
| train | 6–13 | -0.05 | 11% | 6 Nov → | |
| dust2 | 13–11 | 0.03 | 14% | 5 Nov → | |
| ancient | 12–12 | -0.03 | 9% | 16 Sept → | |
| nuke | 4–13 | 0.02 | 23% | 15 Sept → |
Match data via Leetify.
Recent teammates
Milestones
This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.