Zynderella — CS2 Stats
76561199509433529[U:1:1549167801]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · −0.06 avg rating · −2.8pp headshot accuracy · +19ms reaction
Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).
Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches
Last 5
- 3–2 · 60% win rate
- Avg rating 0.06
- Avg headshot accuracy 15%
- Avg reaction 584ms
Last 10
- 3–7 · 30% win rate
- Avg rating 0.05
- Avg headshot accuracy 16%
- Avg reaction 591ms
Last 20
- 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
- Avg rating 0.08
- Avg headshot accuracy 17%
- Avg reaction 582ms
Newest first, from the last 33 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.
Player DNA
Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).
Effective flashesHigh utility contribution
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.
Your pro match
Plays most like Twistzz 77% playstyle similarity
Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.
Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Reaction time. 598ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 33 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Personal bests
Across the last 33 tracked matches.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 inferno | C | 7 | 3–4 | 43% | 0.08 |
 dust2 | S | 7 | 6–1 | 86% | 0.09 |
 nuke | A | 5 | 3–2 | 60% | 0.08 |
 ancient | — | 4 | 2–2 | 50% | 0.06 |
 overpass | — | 3 | 2–1 | 67% | 0.10 |
 anubis | — | 3 | 0–3 | 0% | -0.01 |
 vertigo | — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | 0.06 |
 train | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.18 |
| office | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.20 |
Across the last 33 tracked matches.
Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Best CS2 CrosshairAim Training →
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 13.0526% — below the 15% mark we flag
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 20.9013% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nuke | 5–13 | 0.06 | 14% | 6 Jun → | |
| inferno | 0–13 | -0.02 | 19% | 15 Apr → | |
| inferno | 13–5 | 0.12 | 18% | 30 Mar → | |
| dust2 | 13–6 | 0.13 | 10% | 1 Mar → | |
| ancient | 5–0 | 0.03 | 15% | 26 Jan → | |
| inferno | 3–13 | -0.06 | 11% | 16 Jan → | |
| inferno | 10–13 | 0.07 | 10% | 8 Jan → | |
| dust2 | 0–3 | 0.09 | 31% | 8 Jan → | |
| ancient | 8–13 | 0.10 | 13% | 7 Jan → | |
| inferno | 5–13 | 0.01 | 14% | 7 Jan → | |
| nuke | 5–13 | -0.02 | 13% | 6 Jan → | |
| dust2 | 13–7 | 0.11 | 14% | 6 Jan → | |
| overpass | 13–5 | 0.06 | 16% | 3 Jan → | |
| train | 13–1 | 0.18 | 7% | 3 Jan → | |
| nuke | 13–7 | 0.10 | 16% | 3 Jan → | |
| inferno | 2–0 | 0.40 | 67% | 3 Jan → | |
| dust2 | 13–5 | 0.01 | 11% | 3 Jan → | |
| ancient | 13–11 | 0.07 | 5% | 3 Jan → | |
| anubis | 12–12 | 0.03 | 20% | 3 Jan → | |
| nuke | 13–2 | 0.15 | 13% | 3 Jan → | |
| overpass | 13–7 | 0.05 | 13% | 3 Jan → | |
| vertigo | 13–10 | 0.12 | 7% | 3 Jan → | |
| inferno | 13–7 | 0.03 | 8% | 3 Jan → | |
| ancient | 10–13 | 0.04 | 19% | 3 Jan → | |
| dust2 | 10–1 | 0.07 | 13% | 3 Jan → | |
| anubis | 5–13 | -0.03 | 8% | 3 Jan → | |
| office | 13–2 | 0.20 | 7% | 26 Jun → | |
| anubis | 9–16 | -0.02 | 12% | 14 Jul → | |
| nuke | 16–6 | 0.11 | 24% | 12 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 16–8 | 0.12 | 7% | 12 Jul → | |
| vertigo | 11–16 | -0.00 | 17% | 7 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 16–8 | 0.10 | 18% | 3 Jul → | |
| overpass | 12–16 | 0.18 | 8% | 29 Jun → |
Match data via Leetify.
Recent teammates
This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.