nesquik

nesquik — CS2 Stats

NO76561199503403868[U:1:1543138140]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

814Tracked matches40%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,425 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,425 → 1,425
+1Tracked matches · now 814
0.0ppWin rate · 40.0% → 40.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 11 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,847 +670 11 Feb20 Mar · 18 days played
15,34418,131peak 18,13111 Feb20 Mar
Faceit ELO: 1,425 +0 30 Aug20 Sept · 2 observations
1,4251,425peak 1,42530 Aug20 Sept
18,131Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,425Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-02-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,425
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 106 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnesquikFACEITLevel 8 · 1,425 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,425csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning62
Utility25

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD5149Last 10051%Win rateLLWWLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −3.7pp headshot accuracy · −99ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 488ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 513ms

Last 20

  • 614 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 562ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility2.5
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch3.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 560ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning6.2
Utility2.5
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time556ms−94ms
first ⅓ avg 650ms → last ⅓ avg 556ms
Headshot accuracy15.1%−2.2%
first ⅓ avg 17.3% → last ⅓ avg 15.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 21 Feb
52%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · nuke, 3 Mar
391msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · ancient, 25 Jul
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 12 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
L2Current streak
84In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 71% over 7anubisWeakest map · 31% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA27161159%-0.01
mirageC1971237%-0.03
anubisD1651131%0.01
dust2A116555%0.01
nukeS107370%-0.00
infernoB84450%0.00
overpassS75271%0.02
cache21150%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

568Matches
51%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
79.7ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient14950%1.0016.8
Mirage12150%0.9915.7
Inferno7551%1.0216.5
Nuke6664%0.9916.5
Anubis5244%1.0917.6
Dust24248%0.9614.7
Train3060%0.9915.9
Overpass1735%1.0418.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy
37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.4%Spray accuracy
76.0%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
560msReaction time
36.7%T opening success
41.2%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
4.2%Flash assists
6.33HE damage / grenade
1.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4402 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.7426% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis10–13-0.0311%10 Sept
ancient7–13-0.108%9 Sept
anubis13–50.0316%5 Sept
mirage13–70.0118%5 Sept
ancient3–13-0.0512%5 Sept
ancient16–19-0.0517%5 Sept
inferno11–130.0111%24 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0711%23 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0213%23 Aug
anubis7–130.0416%16 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0120%28 Jul
inferno13–50.0230%28 Jul
mirage13–90.0221%28 Jul
nuke6–130.049%28 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0815%28 Jul
cache5–13-0.0418%26 Jul
anubis9–130.0121%26 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0210%26 Jul
inferno13–90.0318%26 Jul
ancient16–14-0.027%26 Jul
inferno7–130.0613%25 Jul
anubis13–60.0521%25 Jul
ancient13–80.0113%25 Jul
cache13–3-0.0115%25 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0121%25 Jul
nuke16–14-0.0025%25 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0412%25 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0212%25 Jul
mirage10–130.0214%25 Jul
anubis19–170.0316%24 Jul
ancient10–130.0313%24 Jul
ancient13–80.059%24 Jul
anubis16–130.0914%24 Jul
mirage11–13-0.109%23 Jul
mirage13–50.0129%22 Jul
ancient13–10.0420%12 Jul
nuke13–10-0.024%12 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0021%11 Jul
dust28–13-0.0424%20 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0915%20 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0521%20 Mar
nuke13–5-0.0114%18 Mar
dust213–9-0.0713%18 Mar
mirage13–8-0.0320%14 Mar
dust213–50.0326%10 Mar
ancient13–8-0.0324%10 Mar
nuke13–110.0452%3 Mar
anubis10–13-0.0416%1 Mar
nuke13–160.0021%28 Feb
dust213–80.0424%27 Feb
overpass7–130.0519%27 Feb
dust210–130.0721%27 Feb
ancient22–18-0.0213%27 Feb
mirage6–130.0225%26 Feb
ancient7–130.0727%26 Feb
nuke10–13-0.0625%26 Feb
mirage13–4-0.0220%26 Feb
overpass13–8-0.0111%26 Feb
ancient13–100.0616%25 Feb
ancient16–130.0216%25 Feb
anubis5–130.0624%25 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0320%25 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0627%25 Feb
dust211–13-0.0213%25 Feb
anubis5–130.0416%24 Feb
ancient13–5-0.0218%23 Feb
dust213–11-0.0417%23 Feb
overpass9–130.1015%22 Feb
dust213–110.0424%22 Feb
ancient13–30.0423%22 Feb
anubis12–160.0221%21 Feb
ancient13–100.0319%21 Feb
nuke16–130.0517%21 Feb
dust213–40.1714%21 Feb
overpass13–30.0213%21 Feb
nuke13–100.0618%21 Feb
overpass13–70.0216%21 Feb
inferno13–40.0218%20 Feb
mirage16–13-0.0711%17 Feb
anubis13–20.048%17 Feb
ancient13–110.0712%17 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0322%17 Feb
ancient16–130.0018%17 Feb
nuke5–0-0.1114%17 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0318%16 Feb
dust24–13-0.0023%16 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0710%16 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0013%16 Feb
ancient13–9-0.0518%16 Feb
ancient13–80.0519%16 Feb
inferno2–9-0.1922%14 Feb
anubis9–13-0.0430%14 Feb
anubis7–13-0.0219%13 Feb
overpass13–10-0.0216%13 Feb
inferno13–5-0.0325%13 Feb
overpass13–8-0.0218%12 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0511%11 Feb
inferno8–130.1022%11 Feb
dust29–13-0.069%11 Feb
ancient9–13-0.0513%11 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →