bmr

bmr — CS2 Stats

KH76561199484312344[U:1:1524046616]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,224Tracked matches47%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,194Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating15,934Purple band · top ~24.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,224 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 28 days played since 23 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,934 -3,033 23 Mar10 Sept · 28 days played
14,89920,529peak 20,52923 Mar10 Sept
20,801Peak Premier in tracked matches
28Days played since 2026-03-23

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,595 below peak (20,529)
  • +935 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 4,066 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-05
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 10 Sep 2026 and 17 Sep 2026.

Measured 10 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 5 Sep 2026 → 10 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,738), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate58.0%46.8%48.3%above
Shot accuracy2.0%13.0%13.2%11.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.921.061.070.15 short
Match win rate38.2%46.3%46.9%8.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbmrFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER15,934 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning55
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43543Last 10043%Win rateWWWLLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −4.0pp headshot accuracy · +42ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 628ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 607ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility3.9
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels5.1
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 590ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.5
Utility3.9
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time592ms+13ms
first ⅓ avg 579ms → last ⅓ avg 592ms
Headshot accuracy22.6%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 22.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–8 · ancient, 31 Mar
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · dust2, 16 Apr
391msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · inferno, 25 Mar
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 24 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
215In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 50% over 14dust2Weakest map · 35% over 34
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C34122235%0.02
infernoC1761135%0.04
nukeB157847%0.07
mirageB147750%0.03
ancientB126650%0.05
anubisB63350%0.04
overpass220100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 34). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

44,069Lifetime kills
0.92K/D
1,899Matches
38.2%Match win rate
58.0%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players
2.0%Shot accuracy
3,927MVPs
729Hours (in match)
1,743Bombs planted
328Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,856dust2
2,327inferno
935nuke
792vertigo
93train
58office
12italy
6cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

124Matches
59%Win rate
1.31Avg K/D
91.0ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22966%1.3318.7
Mirage2854%1.1015.4
Inferno1450%1.3716.6
Ancient1377%1.7117.3
Anubis1070%1.2719.9
Cache786%1.2019.1
Nuke633%1.2719.3
Vertigo425%1.3520.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.5%Headshot accuracy
36.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.3%Spray accuracy
82.8%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
590msReaction time
39.5%T opening success
53.8%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
1.2%Flash assists
8.09HE damage / grenade
6.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.5199% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 34 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–7-0.0221%27 Jun
dust213–80.0422%27 Jun
dust216–130.0413%27 Jun
dust29–13-0.0719%26 Jun
nuke6–130.1726%26 Jun
overpass13–50.0314%26 Jun
dust213–00.0613%24 Jun
nuke5–130.0422%24 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0320%2 May
dust29–130.0326%29 Apr
mirage13–50.0826%28 Apr
inferno11–13-0.1013%24 Apr
dust213–11-0.0223%23 Apr
inferno13–30.1620%23 Apr
dust211–130.0424%19 Apr
dust29–13-0.0440%17 Apr
mirage13–160.0214%17 Apr
nuke13–90.0125%17 Apr
ancient13–100.1326%17 Apr
dust26–13-0.0124%16 Apr
dust213–20.0629%16 Apr
nuke3–130.0922%16 Apr
nuke8–130.0531%16 Apr
dust213–100.1241%16 Apr
anubis13–7-0.0128%16 Apr
inferno13–160.0413%15 Apr
mirage10–130.0314%15 Apr
dust213–20.0319%15 Apr
dust24–13-0.0226%15 Apr
nuke14–160.1526%14 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0117%14 Apr
inferno5–130.0527%13 Apr
dust27–130.0222%12 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0116%12 Apr
nuke13–30.0529%12 Apr
anubis13–30.1028%11 Apr
inferno10–130.0620%11 Apr
inferno13–16-0.0016%11 Apr
dust213–70.0421%10 Apr
mirage13–100.0724%10 Apr
inferno8–130.1221%10 Apr
dust211–13-0.0132%10 Apr
ancient13–6-0.0316%10 Apr
dust211–130.0524%10 Apr
dust213–160.0819%9 Apr
dust27–130.0438%9 Apr
dust29–130.0121%9 Apr
nuke13–80.1418%9 Apr
inferno8–130.0120%9 Apr
dust20–13-0.0326%9 Apr
inferno14–160.1121%8 Apr
dust214–160.0724%8 Apr
dust211–130.0032%8 Apr
dust215–150.0529%8 Apr
ancient13–60.0520%8 Apr
mirage13–100.0621%8 Apr
anubis13–50.1621%7 Apr
mirage4–130.0218%7 Apr
dust29–13-0.0231%7 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0220%7 Apr
inferno13–80.0122%7 Apr
inferno4–130.0417%7 Apr
nuke3–130.0737%6 Apr
mirage3–130.0124%6 Apr
dust29–130.0827%6 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0130%5 Apr
ancient15–150.0819%5 Apr
dust213–8-0.0422%5 Apr
dust211–13-0.0219%5 Apr
dust213–70.0335%5 Apr
ancient10–130.0429%5 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0524%5 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0316%1 Apr
nuke13–90.0015%1 Apr
ancient13–70.1314%1 Apr
nuke13–60.0916%1 Apr
inferno14–16-0.0318%1 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0124%1 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0313%1 Apr
dust213–70.0230%1 Apr
nuke13–20.0117%1 Apr
inferno13–110.0227%31 Mar
inferno13–10.1712%31 Mar
ancient13–80.1917%31 Mar
dust213–60.1126%31 Mar
anubis11–130.0216%31 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0223%31 Mar
anubis3–13-0.0018%30 Mar
ancient13–90.0619%30 Mar
overpass13–5-0.0021%25 Mar
dust215–15-0.0026%25 Mar
inferno13–10.1018%25 Mar
dust27–13-0.0623%25 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0121%25 Mar
mirage13–100.1227%24 Mar
nuke13–100.0424%24 Mar
mirage11–130.0014%24 Mar
dust211–13-0.0017%24 Mar
mirage13–90.0717%24 Mar
nuke9–130.1425%23 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →