Grazziella

Grazziella — CS2 Stats

FI76561199467147659[U:1:1506881931]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,244Tracked matches57%Win rate2023Tracked since
3,083Hours in CS57Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating12,154Blue band · top ~43.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3 · 910 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 12,154 → 12,154
0Faceit ELO · 910 → 910
+12Tracked matches · now 3,244
−3.3ppWin rate · 60.0% → 56.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 18 days played since 1 Sep 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,154 -488 1 Sept20 Sept · 9 days played
11,81812,642peak 12,6421 Sept20 Sept
Faceit ELO: 910 +0 1 Sept20 Sept · 3 observations
910910peak 9101 Sept20 Sept
13,015Peak Premier in tracked matches
910Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
18Days played since 2026-09-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 910
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 141 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 488 below peak (12,642)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 2,846 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=9,169), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate43.7%41.9%42.7%above
Shot accuracy4.1%12.2%11.3%7.1% short
Kill/death ratio0.860.980.990.14 short
Match win rate40.5%43.3%43.9%3.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGrazziellaFACEITLevel 3 · 910 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER12,154 · Blue bandPEAK ELO910csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim47
Positioning78
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49429Last 10049%Win rateWWWLTWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · +1.1pp headshot accuracy · −69ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 311 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 20

  • 7112 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 613ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim4.7
Utility5.5
Positioning7.8
Opening Duels7.3
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 61% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 72% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 601ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.7
Positioning7.8
Utility5.5
Mechanics4.2
Opening Duels8.7
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time613ms+24ms
first ⅓ avg 589ms → last ⅓ avg 613ms
Headshot accuracy15.2%−3.7%
first ⅓ avg 18.9% → last ⅓ avg 15.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 9–2 · inferno, 16 Sept
39%Best headshot accuracy · 9–1 · overpass, 11 Sept
391msFastest reaction time · 9–3 · nuke, 19 Sept
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 13 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
88In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 75% over 12nukeWeakest map · 40% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB41212051%0.02
nukeC2081240%0.01
ancientS129375%0.02
cacheC73443%-0.05
overpassC73443%0.04
vertigo41325%-0.04
anubis43175%0.00
dust231233%-0.02
eldorado1010%-0.11
mirage1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

55,393Lifetime kills
0.86K/D
4,048Matches
40.5%Match win rate
43.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 3 players
4.1%Shot accuracy
7,912MVPs
1,327Hours (in match)
3,707Bombs planted
712Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4714,353
AUG2,648
FAMAS1,813
AWP1,282
MP91,149

Lifetime map wins

7,884inferno
5,143nuke
2,409dust2
2,344vertigo
670train
214cbble
73lake
48office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

466Matches
49%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
72.5ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient12359%1.0113.7
Inferno9947%0.9914.0
Nuke6951%0.9213.3
Anubis6149%0.9014.3
Dust24139%0.8412.9
Vertigo2524%0.8713.8
Overpass2050%0.8113.9
Mirage1331%0.8011.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
29.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.5%Spray accuracy
69.1%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
601msReaction time
72.3%T opening success
59.5%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
4.2%Flash assists
7.76HE damage / grenade
7.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–80.0113%19 Sept
ancient13–110.0713%19 Sept
inferno9–60.0618%19 Sept
vertigo6–9-0.087%19 Sept
inferno8–80.0317%19 Sept
nuke9–30.2028%19 Sept
dust27–13-0.0029%18 Sept
inferno12–160.0324%18 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0310%18 Sept
inferno11–130.0816%18 Sept
nuke14–160.0322%18 Sept
inferno13–90.1114%18 Sept
nuke6–90.0321%18 Sept
inferno7–9-0.1212%18 Sept
inferno8–80.0511%18 Sept
dust28–13-0.0722%17 Sept
nuke3–13-0.0910%17 Sept
cache13–7-0.0232%17 Sept
nuke2–13-0.0913%17 Sept
overpass9–6-0.018%17 Sept
inferno5–9-0.1311%17 Sept
eldorado5–9-0.1113%17 Sept
cache4–13-0.086%17 Sept
inferno13–70.016%17 Sept
nuke7–9-0.0114%17 Sept
inferno9–30.1016%17 Sept
nuke8–80.0413%17 Sept
inferno8–8-0.107%17 Sept
ancient13–80.1013%17 Sept
inferno9–6-0.0519%17 Sept
inferno9–60.0424%17 Sept
inferno9–7-0.055%17 Sept
nuke9–70.0715%17 Sept
inferno8–8-0.1120%17 Sept
inferno7–9-0.0317%16 Sept
inferno9–20.2227%16 Sept
inferno9–60.128%16 Sept
ancient13–80.0211%15 Sept
ancient13–50.0717%15 Sept
anubis8–130.0519%15 Sept
ancient13–6-0.0115%15 Sept
inferno5–9-0.1114%15 Sept
overpass9–30.1527%15 Sept
vertigo4–9-0.0714%15 Sept
cache9–13-0.0416%14 Sept
inferno13–7-0.049%14 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0127%14 Sept
inferno7–90.0117%14 Sept
inferno8–80.0418%14 Sept
inferno8–80.0211%14 Sept
inferno9–30.2110%14 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0322%13 Sept
cache13–8-0.0526%13 Sept
ancient13–30.0113%13 Sept
nuke13–0-0.019%13 Sept
nuke3–9-0.1318%13 Sept
inferno4–9-0.0516%12 Sept
inferno9–70.058%12 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0323%11 Sept
nuke13–20.1013%11 Sept
inferno5–9-0.1413%11 Sept
overpass9–10.1839%11 Sept
inferno9–40.1123%11 Sept
inferno9–60.0620%11 Sept
nuke2–90.0325%11 Sept
inferno9–50.0517%11 Sept
vertigo2–9-0.0826%11 Sept
inferno10–130.0417%10 Sept
ancient13–30.0710%10 Sept
ancient8–130.016%10 Sept
nuke5–130.0021%10 Sept
inferno9–60.1213%10 Sept
nuke9–20.0727%10 Sept
inferno9–60.1518%10 Sept
overpass2–9-0.0426%10 Sept
inferno7–9-0.0929%10 Sept
overpass8–8-0.0114%9 Sept
vertigo9–70.0910%9 Sept
inferno5–9-0.1020%9 Sept
inferno9–60.1015%9 Sept
cache13–80.0026%8 Sept
dust213–60.0315%8 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0221%8 Sept
nuke9–70.1120%8 Sept
inferno9–7-0.0810%8 Sept
overpass6–9-0.0422%7 Sept
anubis13–90.0219%7 Sept
overpass8–80.069%7 Sept
inferno9–50.1723%7 Sept
nuke0–13-0.066%6 Sept
ancient13–10.0526%6 Sept
anubis13–5-0.0523%6 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0636%5 Sept
nuke13–100.0515%5 Sept
nuke2–13-0.0731%4 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0426%4 Sept
cache9–13-0.0519%4 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0112%3 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0922%3 Sept
cache10–13-0.0914%1 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →