PessDaLizz — CS2 Stats

76561199436764438[U:1:1476498710]

590Tracked matches50%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,239Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.1 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating19,363Purple band · top ~11% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#18977 of 44136 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,287 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,571), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate61.0%44.7%46.1%above
Shot accuracy4.0%11.9%12.6%8.6% short
Kill/death ratio1.011.041.050.05 short
Match win rate50.2%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPessDaLizzFACEITLevel 6 · 1,287 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER19,363 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning50
Utility5

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44506Last 10044%Win rateLWLWTLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.0
Aggression5.1
Utility0.5
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch5.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning5.0
Utility0.5
Mechanics3.6
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time532ms−53ms
first ⅓ avg 585ms → last ⅓ avg 532ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 13–5
130Biggest win — inferno
8Longest win streak
57In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 56% over 9infernoWeakest map · 35% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B1991047%0.01
infernoC1761135%-0.00
cacheC135838%0.01
mirageA116555%-0.01
anubisB105550%-0.03
overpassA95456%-0.03
nukeC83538%-0.01
ancient41325%-0.00
office31233%-0.01
vertigo21150%0.05
debris1010%-0.15
train110100%0.01
alpine110100%-0.01
stronghold1010%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

34,631Lifetime kills
1.01K/D
1,802Matches
50.2%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 6 players
61.0%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 6 players
4.0%Shot accuracy
4,353MVPs
753Hours (in match)
2,183Bombs planted
380Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,711dust2
2,854inferno
1,411nuke
923vertigo
265train
149office
4ar_shoots
4ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

82Matches
52%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
75.6ADR
60%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

48%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2152%1.0815.5
Dust21958%1.1114.7
Ancient1164%1.0216.4
Anubis540%0.8514.6
Inferno333%0.769.3
Train2100%1.1816.0
Nuke1100%1.5018.0
Overpass1100%2.8926.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
66.3%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
530msReaction time
26.4%T opening success
47.9%CT opening success
0.08Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
2.43HE damage / grenade
0.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.0828 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.4323% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke11–13-0.0529%23 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0217%23 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0819%22 Aug
inferno13–30.0536%22 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0617%22 Aug
anubis7–13-0.077%22 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0414%19 Aug
inferno13–90.0318%19 Aug
cache13–40.0824%17 Aug
cache13–5-0.0122%15 Aug
dust28–130.0117%7 Aug
nuke1–9-0.0215%6 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0722%6 Aug
dust216–130.0319%5 Aug
inferno16–130.0216%5 Aug
anubis13–90.0311%4 Aug
dust211–13-0.0314%4 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0118%3 Aug
vertigo7–130.0327%30 Jul
anubis16–13-0.073%29 Jul
dust213–30.0716%29 Jul
vertigo13–50.078%29 Jul
dust213–90.0718%29 Jul
mirage13–60.0317%28 Jul
anubis7–130.0113%28 Jul
inferno3–9-0.1336%28 Jul
debris3–9-0.158%28 Jul
dust210–13-0.0117%27 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0417%18 Jul
cache12–120.0224%1 Jul
cache7–13-0.0427%1 Jul
overpass13–5-0.0418%28 Jun
nuke13–90.0025%23 Jun
mirage5–13-0.1311%23 Jun
dust20–5-0.0514%23 Jun
overpass9–13-0.0211%22 Jun
nuke11–130.0024%21 Jun
anubis14–160.0016%21 Jun
dust213–9-0.0223%21 Jun
dust27–13-0.0120%21 Jun
overpass6–13-0.0721%20 Jun
overpass13–100.0315%18 Jun
dust213–40.0615%17 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0410%16 Jun
ancient16–130.0216%7 Jun
dust28–2-0.0128%7 Jun
inferno13–00.0623%7 Jun
anubis13–80.0125%7 Jun
mirage9–90.0019%6 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0022%6 Jun
ancient6–130.0421%5 Jun
train13–110.0121%3 Jun
cache5–13-0.0721%31 May
office12–120.0622%31 May
alpine13–7-0.0126%30 May
stronghold8–130.0522%30 May
cache13–50.0430%30 May
mirage12–16-0.0512%23 May
nuke1–130.0118%23 May
nuke13–40.0829%23 May
inferno7–13-0.0344%19 May
mirage13–50.1337%18 May
cache8–130.1022%17 May
cache8–13-0.0230%17 May
overpass13–11-0.0612%16 May
inferno16–13-0.0127%16 May
dust210–13-0.0720%16 May
dust26–13-0.0413%14 May
office6–13-0.0323%14 May
inferno15–150.0222%13 May
dust213–110.1228%13 May
office13–8-0.0626%13 May
inferno10–13-0.0128%12 May
cache1–13-0.0424%30 Apr
cache8–10.0533%30 Apr
cache7–13-0.0123%30 Apr
cache13–80.0319%29 Apr
cache8–130.0524%29 Apr
overpass10–13-0.0313%27 Apr
inferno13–30.1030%27 Apr
dust26–13-0.1013%26 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0214%26 Apr
dust213–80.0723%25 Apr
nuke13–5-0.0329%25 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0718%23 Apr
inferno8–8-0.0118%23 Apr
anubis13–5-0.0614%22 Apr
mirage13–5-0.0122%21 Apr
mirage13–40.0226%21 Apr
ancient4–13-0.0319%19 Apr
nuke11–13-0.0718%14 Apr
dust28–130.0121%12 Apr
dust210–130.0020%12 Apr
dust213–100.0222%12 Apr
overpass13–11-0.0913%9 Apr
overpass13–50.0411%27 Mar
anubis4–13-0.0317%27 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0127%26 Mar
overpass10–13-0.0315%26 Mar
inferno15–150.0121%25 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →