tuks

tuks — CS2 Stats

IT76561199423055724[U:1:1462789996]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,290Tracked matches59%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating24,999Top 25% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#20171 of 225603 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,428 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 24,999 → 24,999
0Faceit ELO · 2,428 → 2,428
+1Tracked matches · now 2,290
0.0ppWin rate · 58.6% → 58.6%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 23 Nov 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,999 +3,211 25 Nov18 Sept · 16 days played
19,74525,197peak 25,19725 Nov18 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,428 +0 14 Sept18 Sept · 2 observations
2,4282,428peak 2,42814 Sept18 Sept
25,743Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,428Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2025-11-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,428
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 72 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-14
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-14

Premier CS Rating

  • 198 below peak (25,197)
  • -198 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-14
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-14

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtuksFACEITLevel 10 · 2,428 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER24,999 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,428csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning54
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52444Last 10052%Win rateWWWLLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +2.0pp headshot accuracy · −59ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 485ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 515ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility5.5
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.4
Utility5.5
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time527ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 545ms → last ⅓ avg 527ms
Headshot accuracy20.7%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 21.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 5–13 · mirage, 15 Jun
83%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · train, 13 Jan
313msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · mirage, 19 Jan
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 28 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
89In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 69% over 13nukeWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B23111248%0.02
mirageB23111248%0.02
ancientA1810856%0.00
infernoS139469%0.01
trainB84450%0.02
nukeD72529%-0.01
anubisB63350%-0.01
overpass220100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,511Matches
50%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
76.2ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage36557%1.1015.1
Ancient16747%0.9614.2
Dust214042%0.9514.9
Anubis12852%0.9914.2
Inferno11847%0.9514.6
Overpass7451%0.9713.9
Nuke6133%0.8613.6
Vertigo5452%0.8713.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy
30.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.3%Spray accuracy
74.9%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
539msReaction time
36.9%T opening success
44.3%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
9.56HE damage / grenade
6.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.9205% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–90.1032%17 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0211%13 Sept
overpass13–90.0216%13 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0519%13 Sept
mirage7–130.0135%9 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0227%7 Sept
dust25–13-0.0922%7 Sept
mirage13–60.0111%28 Jun
dust213–00.000%28 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0231%28 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0616%15 Jun
dust213–4-0.0216%15 Jun
dust23–130.0224%15 Jun
dust213–50.1217%15 Jun
mirage5–130.1625%15 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0412%24 May
dust214–16-0.038%22 May
inferno13–30.0122%22 May
dust213–10.0723%22 May
ancient13–11-0.0421%18 May
dust213–7-0.0216%21 Feb
mirage13–70.0522%28 Jan
ancient6–130.0113%25 Jan
dust211–130.1140%25 Jan
anubis15–15-0.0716%23 Jan
mirage6–130.0228%23 Jan
anubis10–13-0.0324%23 Jan
mirage13–60.0118%22 Jan
ancient13–7-0.0219%22 Jan
ancient13–60.0527%22 Jan
anubis13–20.0422%22 Jan
inferno13–30.0032%19 Jan
anubis13–9-0.0320%19 Jan
mirage0–13-0.0233%19 Jan
ancient15–15-0.0424%18 Jan
nuke7–13-0.0516%18 Jan
ancient13–6-0.0013%18 Jan
ancient13–110.0318%17 Jan
dust219–17-0.0318%15 Jan
train13–70.0318%14 Jan
ancient13–20.0226%14 Jan
mirage13–8-0.0221%14 Jan
train2–13-0.0883%13 Jan
anubis10–13-0.0426%12 Jan
inferno13–90.0319%10 Jan
dust212–120.0228%10 Jan
nuke13–7-0.0211%10 Jan
train13–50.0317%10 Jan
inferno13–110.0427%10 Jan
inferno0–40.0129%10 Jan
ancient16–130.0417%9 Jan
dust29–130.0522%9 Jan
inferno11–130.0018%9 Jan
ancient3–130.0227%9 Jan
anubis13–50.0622%9 Jan
nuke11–130.0119%9 Jan
ancient3–80.0120%9 Jan
mirage5–13-0.0139%9 Jan
nuke4–130.0128%9 Jan
mirage12–120.0624%9 Jan
dust213–80.0225%8 Jan
dust27–130.0650%8 Jan
train6–80.1214%8 Jan
inferno13–100.0430%8 Jan
mirage13–80.0019%8 Jan
dust213–9-0.0121%8 Jan
mirage0–2-0.0467%8 Jan
overpass13–30.0921%7 Jan
dust213–10.0423%7 Jan
mirage13–50.0620%7 Jan
inferno13–110.0416%7 Jan
dust213–50.0618%7 Jan
dust25–120.0448%6 Jan
ancient4–130.0415%6 Jan
mirage13–110.0618%6 Jan
mirage10–130.0824%6 Jan
dust21–9-0.0422%5 Jan
inferno13–60.1021%5 Jan
nuke13–80.0825%5 Jan
dust27–130.0638%5 Jan
train11–130.1019%5 Jan
mirage13–40.0525%5 Jan
dust22–13-0.0317%12 Dec
mirage13–80.0711%12 Dec
ancient13–100.0414%6 Dec
mirage13–80.0721%6 Dec
train13–20.0348%28 Nov
ancient9–130.0218%28 Nov
inferno10–13-0.0426%28 Nov
train6–13-0.0728%27 Nov
dust210–13-0.0616%27 Nov
ancient13–80.019%27 Nov
ancient9–13-0.0618%26 Nov
ancient11–13-0.0318%25 Nov
nuke13–16-0.0614%25 Nov
mirage10–13-0.170%25 Nov
mirage11–13-0.0129%25 Nov
inferno10–130.0024%24 Nov
mirage13–11-0.0220%24 Nov
train13–20.0225%23 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →