M0

M0 — CS2 Stats

DE76561199416087440[U:1:1455821712]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,089Tracked matches61%Win rate2022Tracked since
847Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#42801 of 259536 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,665 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,064 +175 6 Jun – 4 Jul · 13 days played
21,96123,314peak 23,3146 Jun4 Jul
24,615Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,665Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
21Days played since 2026-06-06

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,665
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 86 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate50.6%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy5.4%13.0%13.2%7.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.091.061.07meets
Match win rate48.9%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGM0FACEITLevel 8 · 1,665 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,665csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning61
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT50–45–5Last 10050%Win rateLWWLWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −3.5pp headshot accuracy · +31ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 645ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 643ms

Last 20

  • 13–6–1 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility4.6
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels5.4
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 619ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.1
Utility4.6
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact8.6

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time629ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 629ms
Headshot accuracy21.8%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 13–1 · vertigo, 18 Jul →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–4 · dust2, 8 Jun →
438msFastest reaction time · 3–10 · anubis, 23 Jun →
13–0Biggest win · boulder, 17 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
4–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 5ancientWeakest map · 40% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2210–1245%0.00
dust2C198–1142%0.01
ancientC156–940%0.02
infernoB126–650%0.02
nukeB105–550%0.01
anubisB84–450%-0.01
overpassS64–267%0.01
cacheS54–180%0.06
vertigo—11–0100%0.26
boulder—11–0100%0.14
fachwerk—11–0100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

46,316Lifetime kills
1.09K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
2,631Matches
48.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
50.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
5.4%Shot accuracy
5,083MVPs
847Hours (in match)
2,411Bombs planted
524Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,622dust2
2,733inferno
1,915nuke
816vertigo
605office
537train
440italy
302lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

80Matches
62%Win rate
1.31Avg K/D
92.8ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
37%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2167%1.4118.9
Dust21765%1.2217.1
Ancient1173%1.3519.4
Nuke838%1.4320.4
Overpass560%1.4819.4
Inferno475%1.3617.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.6%Headshot accuracy
38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.6%Spray accuracy
87.0%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
619msReaction time
47.7%T opening success
45.7%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
3.4%Flash assists
9.20HE damage / grenade
5.98Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno5–13-0.0318%18 Jul →
nuke13–2-0.0224%18 Jul →
vertigo13–10.2629%18 Jul →
dust29–130.0118%17 Jul →
cache13–60.1019%17 Jul →
nuke9–130.0122%17 Jul →
boulder13–00.1413%17 Jul →
fachwerk13–60.0919%16 Jul →
nuke9–40.0212%16 Jul →
nuke6–20.0111%16 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0119%16 Jul →
inferno13–60.1325%16 Jul →
anubis5–130.0018%15 Jul →
cache13–30.1518%15 Jul →
mirage9–130.0613%15 Jul →
dust213–70.0214%15 Jul →
dust212–12-0.0138%14 Jul →
mirage13–10.0427%14 Jul →
ancient5–130.0325%9 Jul →
inferno13–50.0824%9 Jul →
ancient6–130.0422%9 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0328%8 Jul →
inferno13–8-0.0123%8 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0321%7 Jul →
cache12–12-0.0516%7 Jul →
cache13–30.0631%7 Jul →
nuke13–110.0315%4 Jul →
dust213–50.0442%4 Jul →
ancient13–16-0.0119%4 Jul →
ancient8–130.0619%4 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.0528%28 Jun →
mirage16–120.0133%28 Jun →
mirage15–15-0.0116%28 Jun →
ancient13–8-0.0424%28 Jun →
anubis13–40.0522%28 Jun →
ancient8–130.0115%28 Jun →
ancient10–13-0.0116%27 Jun →
overpass13–90.0229%27 Jun →
nuke13–50.0324%27 Jun →
ancient13–60.0436%27 Jun →
inferno13–5-0.0017%27 Jun →
dust27–13-0.0523%26 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.0133%26 Jun →
overpass13–30.1128%26 Jun →
mirage4–130.0437%26 Jun →
inferno7–13-0.0617%26 Jun →
dust213–90.0524%26 Jun →
mirage13–4-0.0417%26 Jun →
anubis5–13-0.0527%23 Jun →
nuke11–130.0213%23 Jun →
ancient13–10-0.0114%23 Jun →
inferno13–30.0913%23 Jun →
anubis3–10-0.0430%23 Jun →
overpass13–90.0224%23 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0111%23 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.0512%23 Jun →
mirage4–13-0.0518%23 Jun →
ancient13–80.0316%23 Jun →
mirage15–150.0423%23 Jun →
anubis13–5-0.0021%22 Jun →
anubis13–2-0.0121%22 Jun →
inferno3–13-0.0230%22 Jun →
nuke11–130.0118%22 Jun →
overpass11–13-0.0314%22 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0515%22 Jun →
dust213–100.0226%22 Jun →
mirage13–6-0.0713%16 Jun →
inferno13–80.0818%16 Jun →
ancient7–13-0.0012%16 Jun →
dust213–30.2020%16 Jun →
anubis9–13-0.0320%16 Jun →
mirage4–13-0.0228%16 Jun →
mirage13–90.0325%16 Jun →
ancient13–60.0918%15 Jun →
dust29–130.0120%15 Jun →
overpass13–20.0018%15 Jun →
cache13–50.0626%15 Jun →
ancient8–13-0.0129%14 Jun →
mirage13–50.0918%14 Jun →
nuke13–16-0.0213%14 Jun →
dust29–130.0425%14 Jun →
mirage16–140.0521%13 Jun →
dust29–130.0017%13 Jun →
dust213–16-0.0328%13 Jun →
mirage13–8-0.0513%13 Jun →
dust213–4-0.0026%13 Jun →
dust213–90.0628%13 Jun →
dust20–4-0.1050%8 Jun →
mirage9–130.1620%8 Jun →
mirage13–8-0.029%8 Jun →
dust213–110.0123%8 Jun →
ancient13–20.0919%8 Jun →
anubis13–50.0413%7 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0312%7 Jun →
inferno5–13-0.0531%6 Jun →
ancient8–13-0.0212%6 Jun →
dust24–13-0.0311%6 Jun →
overpass2–13-0.0730%6 Jun →
inferno11–13-0.0419%6 Jun →
inferno15–150.0520%6 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.