fakturant

fakturant — CS2 Stats

IL76561199393684730[U:1:1433419002]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,011Tracked matches62%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,899Top 50% of 215,558 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~8.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#88084 of 261709 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,981 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Nov 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 19,899 → 19,899
0Faceit ELO · 1,981 → 1,981
+3Tracked matches · now 2,011
0.0ppWin rate · 62.1% → 62.1%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,899 -1,584 15 Jun – 9 Nov · 20 days played
18,69321,610peak 21,61015 Jun9 Nov
21,909Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,981Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
54Days played since 2026-06-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,981
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 20 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-11-09
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-11-09

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,711 below peak (21,610)
  • -100 over 30 days · steady
  • +1,206 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 101 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-11-09
  • Blue band first seen 2026-11-09

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGfakturantFACEITLevel 9 · 1,981 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER19,899 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,981csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning61
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT56–40–4Last 10056%Win rateWWWLLWWWWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −5.4pp headshot accuracy · −1ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 10

  • 7–2–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 565ms

Last 20

  • 14–4–2 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 565ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility5.4
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning6.1
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact9.0

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time545ms−80ms
first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 545ms
Headshot accuracy20.8%+3.3%
first ⅓ avg 17.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 15–15 · inferno, 30 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 4–9 · inferno, 20 Aug →
352msFastest reaction time · 4–9 · inferno, 20 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 29 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W3Current streak
8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 61% over 23anubisWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2314–961%-0.00
mirageB1910–953%0.03
ancientC188–1044%0.02
dust2A127–558%0.00
nukeA116–555%0.01
anubisC83–538%0.01
cache—43–175%0.00
vertigo—33–0100%0.14
train—11–0100%0.03
office—11–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,507Matches
50%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
78.0ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage48148%1.0915.2
Ancient27349%1.0415.1
Anubis24555%1.1215.3
Inferno17150%1.0014.3
Dust210750%1.0215.3
Nuke10449%1.0514.9
Vertigo9849%0.9714.9
Overpass1856%0.9113.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy
37.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.4%Spray accuracy
82.7%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
547msReaction time
44.8%T opening success
35.9%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
7.91HE damage / grenade
17.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4261 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 35.9178% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage22–190.0114%7 Nov →
ancient13–9-0.0015%4 Nov →
inferno9–60.1026%3 Nov →
mirage10–13-0.0423%3 Nov →
nuke10–13-0.0215%22 Oct →
mirage16–140.0227%22 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0216%20 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0019%11 Oct →
dust213–100.0821%8 Oct →
inferno15–150.1622%30 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0637%27 Sept →
vertigo9–70.159%26 Sept →
inferno6–9-0.0721%24 Sept →
dust213–60.0316%24 Sept →
inferno13–20.0733%23 Sept →
inferno8–80.0822%23 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0225%18 Sept →
inferno9–30.1530%16 Sept →
nuke9–5-0.0232%14 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0228%14 Sept →
anubis16–140.0322%14 Sept →
nuke16–140.0213%10 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.059%8 Sept →
dust27–130.0016%8 Sept →
inferno2–130.0222%8 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.018%7 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0615%7 Sept →
ancient13–20.0211%7 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0437%5 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0510%5 Sept →
inferno13–70.0326%4 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0023%4 Sept →
mirage13–10.1323%3 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.079%27 Aug →
cache16–14-0.0112%27 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0118%26 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0025%26 Aug →
nuke13–30.0915%21 Aug →
inferno4–9-0.2050%20 Aug →
inferno8–8-0.1819%20 Aug →
nuke13–70.0426%20 Aug →
ancient13–50.0527%20 Aug →
train13–100.0323%16 Aug →
office13–10.0210%16 Aug →
nuke13–100.0214%16 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.046%15 Aug →
inferno16–120.0124%7 Aug →
cache13–30.0438%7 Aug →
ancient13–50.0618%7 Aug →
inferno13–3-0.0014%6 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.034%5 Aug →
cache15–15-0.0219%4 Aug →
mirage13–4-0.0412%4 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0120%4 Aug →
ancient13–80.1413%3 Aug →
ancient11–130.0113%3 Aug →
nuke13–110.0220%2 Aug →
mirage8–130.0548%2 Aug →
ancient13–80.099%1 Aug →
nuke7–130.0416%30 Jul →
vertigo9–60.1212%28 Jul →
inferno6–9-0.080%28 Jul →
inferno13–110.0628%28 Jul →
mirage13–90.0825%28 Jul →
anubis10–130.0819%28 Jul →
mirage13–90.0318%27 Jul →
dust26–10-0.0727%26 Jul →
inferno6–9-0.0718%25 Jul →
nuke2–9-0.070%25 Jul →
mirage7–130.0015%25 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.0112%24 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0210%24 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.069%23 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0421%17 Jul →
ancient14–160.0234%13 Jul →
dust213–50.0019%13 Jul →
anubis13–7-0.0011%12 Jul →
inferno9–40.0716%5 Jul →
inferno9–5-0.0825%5 Jul →
inferno5–9-0.135%5 Jul →
anubis3–13-0.0126%5 Jul →
mirage13–60.1519%5 Jul →
inferno13–00.1539%29 Jun →
mirage13–100.0215%29 Jun →
ancient13–9-0.0515%26 Jun →
mirage13–80.1634%26 Jun →
mirage13–100.0627%26 Jun →
ancient13–80.0316%26 Jun →
ancient8–13-0.065%26 Jun →
dust213–90.0523%25 Jun →
anubis13–100.0713%23 Jun →
dust26–13-0.039%23 Jun →
dust213–10-0.0314%22 Jun →
ancient8–13-0.0111%22 Jun →
mirage8–130.0429%21 Jun →
anubis3–13-0.0115%17 Jun →
ancient4–130.0320%16 Jun →
dust213–60.0720%16 Jun →
ancient11–130.0510%15 Jun →
vertigo9–50.1526%15 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.