tvn

tvn — CS2 Stats

MN76561199261835294[U:1:1301569566]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,206Tracked matches50%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,389Top 25% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#39974 of 261548 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 976 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Nov 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,389 +1,375 2 Sept – 8 Nov · 32 days played
22,01425,510peak 25,5102 Sept8 Nov
Faceit ELO: 976 +0 2 Sept – 23 Sept · 4 observations
976976peak 9762 Sept23 Sept
25,510Peak Premier in tracked matches
976Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-09-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 976
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 75 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,121 below peak (25,510)
  • -2,121 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,611 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtvnFACEITLevel 8 · 976 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER23,389 · Pink bandPEAK ELO976csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning75
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–37–9Last 10054%Win rateLWLWLTLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −2.5pp headshot accuracy · −21ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility6.8
Positioning7.5
Opening Duels5.4
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 61% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning7.5
Utility6.8
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels6.9
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time576ms+3ms
first ⅓ avg 573ms → last ⅓ avg 576ms
Headshot accuracy26.9%+2.2%
first ⅓ avg 24.7% → last ⅓ avg 26.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.35Best match rating · 9–2 · inferno, 30 Sept →
75%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · cache, 2 Oct →
453msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · anubis, 15 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 17 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
6–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 78% over 9dust2Weakest map · 45% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2210–1245%0.04
infernoA2113–862%0.05
ancientB199–1047%0.02
mirageA169–756%0.01
anubisA95–456%0.04
cacheS97–278%0.05
nuke—31–233%-0.01
poseidon—10–10%0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

492Matches
51%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
74.2ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage14849%0.9314.1
Ancient8957%0.9815.5
Dust27851%1.0714.3
Inferno7757%1.0115.1
Anubis4745%0.9815.3
Nuke2650%1.1515.0
Overpass1118%0.9014.6
Cache944%0.9014.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.7%Headshot accuracy
30.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.8%Spray accuracy
76.8%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
579msReaction time
61.2%T opening success
53.7%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
14.13HE damage / grenade
11.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–130.0216%8 Nov →
mirage13–70.0213%8 Nov →
dust211–130.0640%7 Nov →
inferno13–9-0.0522%7 Nov →
ancient4–13-0.0026%7 Nov →
dust215–15-0.0725%6 Nov →
dust211–13-0.0618%3 Nov →
anubis3–13-0.0028%3 Nov →
anubis13–20.0532%2 Nov →
mirage13–10.0325%2 Nov →
cache13–80.0023%2 Nov →
cache13–60.0524%2 Nov →
inferno13–4-0.0218%1 Nov →
anubis13–100.0725%28 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0426%28 Oct →
nuke13–110.0523%28 Oct →
inferno6–130.0031%26 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.0035%25 Oct →
ancient10–130.0425%25 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0140%25 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0338%24 Oct →
cache13–60.1336%23 Oct →
ancient9–130.0420%23 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0436%23 Oct →
cache13–90.0926%22 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.079%22 Oct →
inferno12–12-0.0326%21 Oct →
mirage3–130.0328%21 Oct →
inferno10–130.0029%21 Oct →
dust213–90.1742%21 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0015%20 Oct →
mirage13–80.0737%20 Oct →
dust24–130.0331%18 Oct →
dust27–130.0136%17 Oct →
mirage13–00.0017%17 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0712%16 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0417%16 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0713%15 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0021%15 Oct →
dust212–120.0621%14 Oct →
ancient13–40.1220%14 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0614%14 Oct →
cache15–15-0.0117%13 Oct →
inferno13–20.0318%12 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0122%12 Oct →
ancient10–130.0517%12 Oct →
mirage13–70.0227%6 Oct →
ancient13–30.0617%6 Oct →
anubis13–90.0929%6 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0027%5 Oct →
inferno13–50.0930%5 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0425%4 Oct →
dust213–100.1035%3 Oct →
ancient13–60.1125%2 Oct →
cache13–00.0075%2 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0124%1 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0716%1 Oct →
ancient13–90.0830%30 Sept →
inferno5–9-0.039%30 Sept →
inferno4–90.0621%30 Sept →
inferno9–20.3548%30 Sept →
inferno9–50.2424%30 Sept →
inferno9–30.1325%30 Sept →
poseidon7–90.1320%30 Sept →
ancient12–120.1725%30 Sept →
ancient13–90.0114%29 Sept →
inferno13–20.0415%29 Sept →
dust213–110.0527%28 Sept →
inferno13–90.0323%28 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0319%27 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0828%27 Sept →
cache9–130.1020%27 Sept →
dust211–130.1426%26 Sept →
cache13–60.0621%26 Sept →
dust212–120.0220%26 Sept →
mirage8–130.0926%26 Sept →
mirage4–2-0.0929%26 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.067%24 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0222%24 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0326%24 Sept →
dust213–90.0027%23 Sept →
dust213–100.1732%23 Sept →
nuke12–12-0.0219%22 Sept →
dust213–100.0214%22 Sept →
dust213–70.1118%22 Sept →
cache13–70.0740%22 Sept →
ancient13–70.1126%22 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0922%22 Sept →
inferno3–9-0.0325%22 Sept →
anubis4–130.0123%21 Sept →
inferno13–60.1131%21 Sept →
mirage12–120.1327%21 Sept →
dust213–40.0730%20 Sept →
anubis13–90.0820%20 Sept →
inferno13–70.2029%20 Sept →
mirage13–110.1436%20 Sept →
anubis13–20.0924%20 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0332%19 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0323%19 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0323%18 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.