qLz

qLz — CS2 Stats

ID76561199256731286[U:1:1296465558]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

418Tracked matches60%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,744Hours in CS20Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,108Top 50% of 215,248 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#82563 of 261491 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,216 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Nov 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 20,108 → 20,108
0Faceit ELO · 1,216 → 1,216
+12Tracked matches · now 418
−13.1ppWin rate · 73.1% → 60.0%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,108 +3,958 15 Aug – 8 Nov · 25 days played
15,36320,108peak 20,10815 Aug8 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,216 +0 22 Sept – 8 Nov · 2 observations
1,2161,216peak 1,21622 Sept8 Nov
20,108Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,216Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
48Days played since 2026-08-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,216
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 135 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-22
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-22

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 20,108
  • +2,402 over 30 days · improving
  • +3,958 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,892 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-11-08
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-22

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches11——
Win rate55%——
K/D1.27——
Headshot %49%——

Measured 8 Nov 2026 → 14 Nov 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate51.5%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy12.3%13.0%13.2%0.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.261.061.07above
Match win rate83.9%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGqLzFACEITLevel 8 · 1,216 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER20,108 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,216csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92
Positioning58
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–38–9Last 10053%Win rateWWWWLTLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +8.6pp headshot accuracy · +23ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 533ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim9.2
Utility5.6
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch4.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2
Positioning5.8
Utility5.6
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time531ms+25ms
first ⅓ avg 506ms → last ⅓ avg 531ms
Headshot accuracy21.8%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 22.6% → last ⅓ avg 21.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 9–1 · nuke, 7 Oct →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · dust2, 10 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · dust2, 7 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 13 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

12Longest win streak
W4Current streak
6–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 86% over 7dust2Weakest map · 28% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB5024–2648%0.03
dust2D185–1328%0.02
nukeS86–275%0.07
ancientS86–275%0.05
anubisS76–186%0.03
infernoS54–180%0.06
cache—32–167%-0.01
train—10–10%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (28% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

62,115Lifetime kills
1.26K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players
7,215Matches
83.9%Match win rate · Top 1% of Level 8 players
51.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
12.3%Shot accuracy
8,746MVPs
1,824Hours (in match)
1,721Bombs planted
843Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,127dust2
1,755inferno
976vertigo
830nuke
327cbble
294train
197office
149italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

96Matches
57%Win rate
1.35Avg K/D
96.5ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2552%1.4021.1
Dust21759%1.4223.9
Anubis1377%1.4218.9
Inferno989%1.3216.3
Nuke967%1.3719.0
Ancient520%1.4623.4
Cache425%1.3418.3
Overpass20%0.7512.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.3%Headshot accuracy
39.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
47.3%Spray accuracy
83.3%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
537msReaction time
38.0%T opening success
46.4%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
9.74HE damage / grenade
7.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.0473% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

28% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–90.0525%13 Nov →
anubis13–90.0723%13 Nov →
mirage13–00.1121%13 Nov →
mirage13–9-0.0543%12 Nov →
mirage7–130.0530%12 Nov →
mirage12–120.0714%11 Nov →
dust26–13-0.0511%11 Nov →
mirage9–130.0238%8 Nov →
dust27–13-0.0630%6 Nov →
mirage13–11-0.0414%5 Nov →
mirage12–12-0.0416%4 Nov →
cache13–70.0523%1 Nov →
nuke7–9-0.0515%29 Oct →
mirage13–70.108%29 Oct →
dust26–130.1413%29 Oct →
mirage13–60.0522%29 Oct →
mirage13–110.0322%27 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0422%27 Oct →
mirage7–110.000%27 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0424%27 Oct →
dust27–13-0.1043%27 Oct →
train4–13-0.0019%26 Oct →
mirage13–70.0443%26 Oct →
dust212–120.0228%26 Oct →
mirage13–80.0519%26 Oct →
mirage12–120.0235%26 Oct →
mirage13–20.1113%23 Oct →
anubis13–50.0315%23 Oct →
anubis15–150.0114%23 Oct →
mirage13–40.0923%21 Oct →
mirage13–70.0620%21 Oct →
ancient13–10.0918%21 Oct →
mirage13–10.0615%20 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0122%18 Oct →
mirage13–50.1214%14 Oct →
mirage13–60.0526%14 Oct →
anubis13–5-0.0323%14 Oct →
ancient13–60.1819%10 Oct →
mirage13–100.0422%10 Oct →
nuke13–70.1315%10 Oct →
dust213–90.0620%10 Oct →
mirage10–130.0523%9 Oct →
dust22–130.0119%8 Oct →
mirage10–130.1018%8 Oct →
nuke9–10.2532%7 Oct →
mirage8–130.1016%7 Oct →
mirage13–40.0622%7 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.0119%7 Oct →
cache9–13-0.067%5 Oct →
nuke9–130.0911%4 Oct →
ancient13–60.0812%4 Oct →
anubis13–100.0112%4 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.009%4 Oct →
cache13–4-0.026%4 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0312%3 Oct →
mirage10–130.0317%1 Oct →
mirage13–110.0323%30 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0422%30 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.016%30 Sept →
mirage13–50.0522%29 Sept →
ancient9–130.0019%28 Sept →
ancient13–40.1425%23 Sept →
inferno13–80.0826%23 Sept →
nuke13–40.1312%22 Sept →
mirage8–130.0416%22 Sept →
dust213–40.1128%22 Sept →
mirage12–120.0518%21 Sept →
dust27–130.1024%19 Sept →
dust212–160.0125%17 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0126%16 Sept →
dust212–120.0723%16 Sept →
dust213–70.0227%16 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0139%16 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.083%15 Sept →
mirage4–130.0136%15 Sept →
mirage13–10.0526%13 Sept →
ancient13–50.0418%13 Sept →
nuke13–100.0621%13 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0321%13 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0218%12 Sept →
mirage2–130.0131%12 Sept →
dust213–50.0550%10 Sept →
mirage13–60.0235%10 Sept →
mirage6–130.0220%10 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0725%10 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0428%7 Sept →
inferno16–140.0217%6 Sept →
inferno7–130.1217%2 Sept →
anubis13–60.0520%2 Sept →
dust28–130.0215%2 Sept →
inferno13–90.0218%30 Aug →
mirage9–130.1028%29 Aug →
inferno13–90.0411%28 Aug →
mirage16–140.0313%26 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0220%26 Aug →
mirage10–130.0227%25 Aug →
anubis12–30.069%25 Aug →
mirage13–3-0.0317%23 Aug →
mirage15–150.0922%17 Aug →
dust210–130.0316%15 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches12-Win StreakAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.