MaBrick

MaBrick — CS2 Stats

RO76561199231518322[U:1:1271252594]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,090Tracked matches48%Win rate2023Tracked since
4,221Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating26,394Top 10% of 192,959 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9811 of 240606 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,869 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−66Premier CS Rating · 26,460 → 26,394
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 15 days played since 1 Sep 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,394 +1,822 1 Sept23 Sept · 9 days played
24,57226,460peak 26,4601 Sept23 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,869 +0 1 Sept20 Sept · 4 observations
1,8691,869peak 1,8691 Sept20 Sept
26,642Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,869Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
15Days played since 2026-09-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,869
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 132 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 66 below peak (26,460)
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 3,606 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-08
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,086), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate68.4%46.8%48.3%above
Shot accuracy0.0%13.0%13.2%13.2% short
Kill/death ratio1.921.061.07above
Match win rate47.0%46.3%46.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMaBrickFACEITLevel 8 · 1,869 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER26,394 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,869csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning59
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51418Last 10051%Win rateLLLLLLTWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −60pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +3.4pp headshot accuracy · +72ms reaction

Win rate down 60pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 05 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 10

  • 271 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility4.1
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch2.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 90% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 587ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.9
Utility4.1
Mechanics8.9
Opening Duels4.8
Win Impact4.4

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time587ms+2ms
first ⅓ avg 585ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms
Headshot accuracy20.4%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 21.9% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–0 · ancient, 7 Sept
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–4 · ancient, 23 Sept
383msFastest reaction time · 2–8 · dust2, 11 Sept
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 22 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L6Current streak
105In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 88% over 8anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A25141156%0.01
mirageC1981142%0.01
infernoC125742%-0.01
ancientA106460%0.01
nukeA106460%0.01
cacheS87188%0.01
anubisD72529%-0.02
office42250%-0.01
overpass41325%0.02
vertigo1010%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

257,787Lifetime kills
1.92K/D · Top 5% of Level 8 players
6,035Matches
47.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
68.4%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 8 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
13,259MVPs
4,221Hours (in match)
6,295Bombs planted
2,509Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47133,390
AWP15,336
XM10143,873
MP93,528
UMP-452,646

Lifetime map wins

9,943dust2
7,668nuke
7,485inferno
3,224vertigo
1,091office
1,056train
65italy
16cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

504Matches
52%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
77.8ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage14053%0.9714.0
Anubis8456%1.1615.3
Dust27549%0.9414.3
Ancient7353%0.9514.6
Inferno6346%0.9814.8
Nuke4650%1.2217.2
Train956%1.1713.9
Overpass667%1.2219.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.9%Spray accuracy
90.1%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
587msReaction time
53.1%T opening success
45.1%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
10.78HE damage / grenade
6.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4148 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage6–13-0.0414%23 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0015%23 Sept
mirage5–130.0114%23 Sept
office11–13-0.0126%23 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0824%23 Sept
ancient0–4-0.0450%23 Sept
mirage12–120.1020%23 Sept
nuke13–6-0.0210%23 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0424%23 Sept
dust216–120.0129%23 Sept
nuke13–80.0322%22 Sept
dust213–6-0.0241%22 Sept
dust213–20.038%22 Sept
mirage16–140.0626%22 Sept
ancient13–100.0219%22 Sept
anubis7–13-0.1210%22 Sept
dust213–160.0422%22 Sept
mirage13–0-0.010%22 Sept
cache13–50.0224%22 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0121%22 Sept
inferno13–70.0422%22 Sept
cache13–11-0.0312%22 Sept
ancient13–50.0526%22 Sept
dust24–130.0126%22 Sept
mirage3–130.0219%22 Sept
dust210–130.0413%22 Sept
cache13–7-0.0119%22 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0123%22 Sept
dust25–130.0123%22 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0420%22 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0016%22 Sept
mirage13–80.0721%22 Sept
overpass4–130.0719%22 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0224%21 Sept
mirage2–13-0.105%21 Sept
dust213–110.0039%21 Sept
inferno9–130.0224%18 Sept
dust213–40.0215%18 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0213%18 Sept
anubis7–130.0116%18 Sept
anubis4–13-0.0314%18 Sept
mirage12–12-0.0516%18 Sept
anubis2–130.0315%17 Sept
overpass5–130.0616%17 Sept
dust25–130.0120%17 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0220%17 Sept
mirage9–130.0324%17 Sept
office13–5-0.0322%17 Sept
anubis12–12-0.0622%17 Sept
ancient13–6-0.0220%17 Sept
vertigo9–130.0521%16 Sept
dust213–110.0613%16 Sept
nuke13–70.0318%16 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0636%16 Sept
dust29–130.0118%16 Sept
dust213–50.0418%16 Sept
cache13–10-0.0325%16 Sept
nuke13–60.0720%16 Sept
dust213–110.0118%15 Sept
cache6–130.0523%15 Sept
nuke12–120.0219%15 Sept
inferno13–9-0.1136%15 Sept
mirage13–90.0025%15 Sept
inferno13–10.0716%15 Sept
dust212–120.0117%15 Sept
nuke13–7-0.0334%15 Sept
ancient3–13-0.0022%15 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0116%15 Sept
cache13–9-0.0126%15 Sept
dust213–8-0.0026%15 Sept
cache13–80.0018%14 Sept
overpass13–110.0221%14 Sept
dust22–8-0.100%11 Sept
dust213–40.0834%10 Sept
mirage13–90.0133%10 Sept
dust213–90.0039%10 Sept
anubis13–110.0415%9 Sept
inferno13–30.0624%9 Sept
ancient1–8-0.088%9 Sept
mirage12–120.0718%8 Sept
overpass6–13-0.0619%8 Sept
dust212–120.0035%7 Sept
ancient13–90.0222%7 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0427%7 Sept
mirage12–120.0515%7 Sept
inferno11–130.0620%7 Sept
anubis13–00.017%7 Sept
ancient13–00.1917%7 Sept
dust213–40.0233%7 Sept
dust26–13-0.0423%6 Sept
inferno2–13-0.0429%6 Sept
dust21–130.0050%6 Sept
office11–13-0.0218%6 Sept
office13–40.0319%6 Sept
cache13–20.074%6 Sept
dust213–20.0734%6 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0120%6 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0410%5 Sept
dust213–11-0.0326%5 Sept
nuke16–120.0519%5 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →