Husky

Husky — CS2 Stats

US76561198380244574[U:1:419978846]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,950Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating24,313Top 25% of 213,740 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#29921 of 260212 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,103 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Nov 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,313 +163 28 Aug – 5 Nov · 33 days played
23,64226,931peak 26,93128 Aug5 Nov
Faceit ELO: 2,103 +0 28 Aug – 18 Sept · 4 observations
2,1032,103peak 2,10328 Aug18 Sept
27,179Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,103Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,103
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 397 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,618 below peak (26,931)
  • -2,540 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 687 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHuskyFACEITLevel 10 · 2,103 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER24,313 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,103csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning58
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT48–49–3Last 10048%Win rateLWWWLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −2.4pp headshot accuracy · +10ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 535ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility5.0
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.8
Utility5.0
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels5.2
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time539ms−15ms
first ⅓ avg 554ms → last ⅓ avg 539ms
Headshot accuracy21.3%+3.1%
first ⅓ avg 18.2% → last ⅓ avg 21.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–5 · dust2, 3 Sept →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · cache, 27 Sept →
383msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · mirage, 28 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 29 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
2–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 57% over 7nukeWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A3218–1456%0.02
mirageB2110–1148%0.02
cacheB157–847%0.01
anubisD93–633%-0.02
infernoB84–450%0.01
nukeD82–625%-0.01
ancientA74–357%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,373Matches
53%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
74.9ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage13653%1.0415.3
Dust29655%1.0315.7
Anubis6862%1.0516.0
Nuke5145%0.9315.2
Inferno4553%0.9313.6
Ancient4344%0.8614.4
Cache2458%1.3017.0
Vertigo1527%1.2017.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.4%Headshot accuracy
38.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.4%Spray accuracy
80.7%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
539msReaction time
53.0%T opening success
48.4%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
7.9%Flash assists
3.24HE damage / grenade
12.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage6–130.0019%6 Nov →
inferno13–9-0.0028%5 Nov →
inferno13–10-0.0123%5 Nov →
inferno13–50.0413%5 Nov →
dust210–13-0.0128%2 Nov →
ancient13–50.0510%2 Nov →
anubis0–13-0.0015%2 Nov →
mirage13–80.0220%1 Nov →
mirage19–16-0.0116%31 Oct →
cache13–30.0725%30 Oct →
dust27–130.0317%30 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0020%29 Oct →
mirage13–10.1417%29 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0524%29 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0529%29 Oct →
mirage16–120.0111%28 Oct →
nuke13–100.0123%26 Oct →
anubis11–130.0522%24 Oct →
ancient13–50.0341%23 Oct →
nuke12–12-0.0115%22 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0515%22 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0316%21 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0226%21 Oct →
inferno13–50.0830%21 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0132%20 Oct →
mirage9–130.0224%16 Oct →
ancient3–130.0646%16 Oct →
inferno11–130.0326%15 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0416%15 Oct →
anubis13–5-0.056%12 Oct →
nuke13–60.0220%12 Oct →
cache2–13-0.0518%12 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0011%12 Oct →
dust210–130.0119%12 Oct →
ancient13–100.0116%10 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.029%9 Oct →
dust213–40.0523%9 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0022%9 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0222%9 Oct →
inferno9–130.0410%9 Oct →
dust210–130.1328%7 Oct →
cache4–130.0128%7 Oct →
dust210–130.0220%7 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0125%6 Oct →
ancient9–5-0.0510%6 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0119%2 Oct →
cache13–40.0921%2 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.079%2 Oct →
dust212–120.0315%30 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0817%28 Sept →
mirage13–40.0528%28 Sept →
cache13–5-0.1067%27 Sept →
mirage13–70.1117%27 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0115%25 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0116%24 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0519%24 Sept →
anubis13–110.0435%24 Sept →
mirage13–80.1319%24 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0235%19 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0122%19 Sept →
dust213–90.0319%19 Sept →
dust213–50.069%18 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0322%18 Sept →
dust216–120.0330%18 Sept →
anubis0–13-0.1231%17 Sept →
dust213–3-0.0429%17 Sept →
dust213–16-0.0413%15 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0321%15 Sept →
anubis13–110.0113%14 Sept →
cache13–90.0620%14 Sept →
dust213–60.0824%11 Sept →
mirage7–130.0017%11 Sept →
dust212–120.0118%10 Sept →
dust213–40.0413%10 Sept →
dust213–100.0616%10 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0214%10 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0027%9 Sept →
dust213–70.0620%9 Sept →
mirage16–13-0.0122%7 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0622%5 Sept →
nuke8–130.0122%5 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0418%5 Sept →
dust213–50.0330%5 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0016%4 Sept →
cache13–40.038%4 Sept →
dust28–130.0523%4 Sept →
dust213–50.1417%3 Sept →
cache13–80.0514%3 Sept →
dust213–90.0520%3 Sept →
nuke10–130.0319%3 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0613%3 Sept →
cache9–130.0721%3 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.078%3 Sept →
mirage13–40.0917%3 Sept →
dust213–60.1022%3 Sept →
cache13–100.0115%3 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0721%2 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0418%2 Sept →
dust213–100.0316%2 Sept →
mirage2–130.0318%1 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.