General Kregg

General Kregg — CS2 Stats

KN76561199229395129[U:1:1269129401]Steam profile ↗

124Tracked matches66%Win rate2026Tracked since
64Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating11,701Blue band · top ~45.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5689 of 7948 tracked
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

11,701Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 11,701
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 3,299 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGeneral KreggPREMIER11,701 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning66
Utility27

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54397Last 10054%Win rateWWLLWLTWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.0
Aggression8.5
Utility2.7
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels5.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 594ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning6.6
Utility2.7
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels5.2
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time591ms−33ms
first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 591ms
Headshot accuracy14.5%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 14.4% → last ⅓ avg 14.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — inferno 9–3
131Biggest win — dust2
7Longest win streak
W2Current streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 71% over 7infernoWeakest map · 48% over 29
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB29141548%0.03
dust2A22121055%0.02
mirageA159660%0.03
nukeA85363%0.02
vertigoS75271%0.06
anubis41325%0.05
ancient31233%0.02
poseidon31233%-0.03
cache32167%0.05
overpass2020%0.04
train220100%0.13
office110100%0.15
warden110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (48% over 29). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

3,439Lifetime kills
1.13K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
197Matches
53.8%Match win rate · Top 10% of tracked players
41.0%Headshot %
0.6%Shot accuracy
489MVPs
64Hours (in match)
247Bombs planted
61Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

470dust2
342inferno
144nuke
110vertigo
49office
46train
7assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.0%Headshot accuracy
38.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.8%Spray accuracy
81.7%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
594msReaction time
44.2%T opening success
57.0%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
5.67HE damage / grenade
3.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.9626% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3871 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

48% win rate across 29 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo13–80.0715%3 Jun
vertigo13–7-0.0313%3 Jun
anubis9–130.0315%30 May
anubis4–130.0816%30 May
office13–50.157%13 May
inferno2–9-0.1319%10 May
inferno8–8-0.0311%10 May
inferno9–30.2411%10 May
inferno9–60.0215%10 May
inferno5–90.0614%10 May
inferno9–60.0610%10 May
inferno2–9-0.1311%10 May
mirage11–130.1113%9 May
ancient0–12-0.0120%9 May
mirage13–30.1133%9 May
dust25–13-0.0611%8 May
mirage11–130.0516%7 May
overpass10–130.0313%7 May
poseidon1–9-0.1114%7 May
inferno9–50.1915%7 May
poseidon8–8-0.0414%7 May
inferno8–80.0719%7 May
inferno9–60.1212%7 May
inferno2–9-0.1316%7 May
inferno9–60.0511%6 May
inferno13–10-0.0010%6 May
cache12–12-0.0323%6 May
cache13–70.0619%6 May
inferno13–110.0215%5 May
warden9–50.0112%5 May
inferno6–9-0.0514%3 May
inferno8–80.0912%3 May
nuke5–9-0.0511%3 May
inferno9–30.156%3 May
inferno8–80.1513%3 May
nuke6–9-0.0414%3 May
inferno9–70.1113%3 May
poseidon9–50.0511%3 May
inferno7–90.013%3 May
inferno8–80.0713%3 May
dust216–14-0.0110%3 May
mirage13–80.0213%3 May
dust216–140.0518%2 May
dust27–13-0.0118%2 May
nuke13–9-0.0014%2 May
inferno3–13-0.066%2 May
dust213–10.0536%2 May
nuke16–12-0.0314%2 May
anubis13–40.179%2 May
inferno13–80.0321%1 May
dust216–140.0414%29 Apr
nuke13–60.0511%29 Apr
cache13–60.1116%29 Apr
mirage6–13-0.059%28 Apr
mirage13–2-0.0022%28 Apr
dust213–4-0.0220%28 Apr
mirage13–4-0.0111%28 Apr
ancient13–110.007%27 Apr
dust213–50.026%27 Apr
inferno9–130.149%26 Apr
dust27–130.0810%26 Apr
ancient5–70.0614%23 Apr
dust213–11-0.0113%23 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0212%23 Apr
dust210–13-0.029%23 Apr
nuke11–130.0210%23 Apr
mirage13–11-0.016%22 Apr
dust213–10.0619%22 Apr
train13–70.0517%22 Apr
train7–00.2018%22 Apr
vertigo9–50.100%22 Apr
dust211–130.0514%16 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0316%16 Apr
inferno9–70.0318%16 Apr
inferno9–5-0.045%16 Apr
vertigo13–90.0517%12 Apr
dust213–40.1316%12 Apr
dust25–13-0.0221%12 Apr
nuke13–90.1213%11 Apr
vertigo10–130.0816%10 Apr
vertigo13–70.018%10 Apr
dust25–130.0017%9 Apr
vertigo11–130.1310%9 Apr
mirage13–60.1313%8 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0419%8 Apr
inferno10–130.043%31 Mar
dust213–80.0024%31 Mar
dust22–13-0.0515%31 Mar
mirage13–100.0513%31 Mar
dust23–13-0.030%31 Mar
mirage13–4-0.004%31 Mar
overpass1–130.0513%31 Mar
mirage9–130.069%30 Mar
nuke13–30.0816%29 Mar
dust214–160.1124%29 Mar
dust213–100.0229%29 Mar
mirage9–130.049%29 Mar
dust213–70.0324%29 Mar
mirage13–100.0222%28 Mar
anubis4–13-0.0614%27 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →