BadSpellr

BadSpellr — CS2 Stats

CA76561199217838230[U:1:1257572502]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,139Tracked matches47%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.1 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating8,196Light Blue band · top ~63.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 671 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (23 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 8,196 +2,812 4 Jun – 23 Sept · 25 days played
4,6678,472peak 8,4724 Jun23 Sept
Faceit ELO: 671 +0 30 Aug – 20 Sept · 2 observations
671671peak 67130 Aug20 Sept
8,472Peak Premier in tracked matches
671Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
51Days played since 2026-06-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 671
  • Next: Level 3 at 751 — 80 to go
  • Reached: Level 2
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 276 below peak (8,472)
  • +432 over 30 days · improving
  • +3,197 over 90 days
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 1,804 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBadSpellrFACEITLevel 5 · 671 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER8,196 · Light Blue bandPEAK ELO671csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning48
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–52–1Last 10047%Win rateLWLLLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −0.1pp headshot accuracy · +18ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 8%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 607ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim5.0
Utility6.0
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 608ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning4.8
Utility6.0
Mechanics4.6
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time601ms+9ms
first ⅓ avg 592ms → last ⅓ avg 601ms
Headshot accuracy13.3%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 11.2% → last ⅓ avg 13.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–3 · nuke, 13 Aug →
30%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · dust2, 4 Jun →
344msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · cache, 23 Jun →
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 3 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
7–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 63% over 16mirageWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB2110–1148%0.00
dust2C187–1139%0.01
ancientA1610–663%0.00
cacheC145–936%0.01
anubisB126–650%0.00
infernoA116–555%-0.01
mirageD62–433%-0.01
overpass—21–150%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

730Matches
51%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
72.9ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage19353%0.9414.1
Dust218548%0.9313.7
Inferno10050%0.8813.1
Nuke7455%0.9414.0
Anubis6248%1.0014.4
Ancient5450%0.9113.2
Overpass2454%1.1014.8
Cache2152%1.3017.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.6%Headshot accuracy
37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
70.6%Counter-strafing
13.0°Preaim
608msReaction time
32.3%T opening success
39.8%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
13.28HE damage / grenade
8.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 13.0287° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.6362% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  3. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4546 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis7–13-0.0612%15 Oct →
anubis13–90.047%12 Oct →
cache11–13-0.096%27 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.027%27 Sept →
mirage8–130.0711%23 Sept →
dust213–90.0422%22 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0111%22 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0515%20 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.037%20 Sept →
anubis13–60.0415%14 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0211%9 Sept →
mirage16–130.0111%7 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0514%28 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0312%28 Aug →
nuke16–14-0.079%23 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0913%21 Aug →
cache13–80.0614%21 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0213%20 Aug →
inferno13–100.038%19 Aug →
cache1–8-0.078%18 Aug →
dust220–22-0.0325%18 Aug →
nuke11–130.0317%18 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0117%15 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0817%15 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0310%15 Aug →
ancient13–30.0710%15 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0123%15 Aug →
nuke13–30.1328%13 Aug →
cache11–130.0914%7 Aug →
anubis13–80.0613%3 Aug →
nuke11–40.004%28 Jul →
cache13–60.1020%23 Jul →
anubis13–10-0.0214%16 Jul →
cache13–30.057%16 Jul →
dust29–130.0010%15 Jul →
ancient13–50.076%14 Jul →
cache7–130.048%14 Jul →
nuke13–8-0.0220%14 Jul →
ancient13–60.0211%14 Jul →
cache13–90.0818%13 Jul →
inferno13–50.0810%13 Jul →
cache6–13-0.033%13 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.036%13 Jul →
inferno13–50.0414%11 Jul →
dust210–130.1018%11 Jul →
cache13–30.0110%9 Jul →
cache10–130.0313%9 Jul →
dust210–130.0622%7 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0714%6 Jul →
cache4–13-0.0617%6 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0210%4 Jul →
ancient19–16-0.0412%3 Jul →
ancient13–9-0.0111%2 Jul →
anubis9–130.017%2 Jul →
nuke13–16-0.019%1 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0319%1 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0814%1 Jul →
dust27–130.1111%29 Jun →
nuke13–8-0.0712%24 Jun →
nuke8–120.067%24 Jun →
nuke13–50.048%24 Jun →
nuke9–130.0414%24 Jun →
overpass13–110.0610%23 Jun →
ancient13–70.0113%23 Jun →
cache3–13-0.020%23 Jun →
ancient6–13-0.038%22 Jun →
ancient9–13-0.0316%22 Jun →
ancient11–130.029%21 Jun →
nuke11–130.0910%19 Jun →
ancient13–30.0212%19 Jun →
inferno8–13-0.0315%19 Jun →
dust213–11-0.0610%18 Jun →
dust26–130.0014%18 Jun →
nuke11–13-0.0310%17 Jun →
dust213–70.047%17 Jun →
dust213–80.0521%17 Jun →
dust213–16-0.0417%17 Jun →
ancient10–130.0017%17 Jun →
anubis13–60.0510%16 Jun →
nuke9–13-0.059%16 Jun →
anubis13–6-0.019%15 Jun →
overpass4–130.048%15 Jun →
inferno16–12-0.025%15 Jun →
ancient22–19-0.035%11 Jun →
ancient2–13-0.094%10 Jun →
anubis15–150.0212%10 Jun →
nuke13–11-0.0311%10 Jun →
nuke9–130.026%9 Jun →
ancient16–130.006%9 Jun →
mirage14–160.019%9 Jun →
ancient11–130.025%8 Jun →
inferno13–11-0.046%8 Jun →
inferno13–90.0115%7 Jun →
dust213–60.0330%4 Jun →
dust212–160.0114%4 Jun →
nuke10–130.0511%4 Jun →
nuke19–17-0.0110%3 Jun →
dust213–20.016%3 Jun →
mirage3–13-0.0322%3 Jun →
dust213–10-0.0413%2 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.