LotsQ

LotsQ — CS2 Stats

FI76561199210823413[U:1:1250557685]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,566Tracked matches52%Win rate2024Tracked since
1,576Hours in CS37Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating11,133Blue band · top ~48.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 969 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 25 days played since 16 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,133 +712 16 Aug21 Sept · 19 days played
10,42113,674peak 13,67416 Aug21 Sept
Faceit ELO: 969 +0 3 Sept21 Sept · 2 observations
969969peak 9693 Sept21 Sept
13,674Peak Premier in tracked matches
969Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
25Days played since 2026-08-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 969
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 82 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,541 below peak (13,674)
  • -665 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 3,867 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,847), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate42.0%42.7%43.8%1.8% short
Shot accuracy0.0%11.3%12.0%12.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.620.991.020.40 short
Match win rate40.5%43.9%44.7%4.2% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 5 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLotsQFACEITLevel 4 · 969 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER11,133 · Blue bandPEAK ELO969csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning38
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52435Last 10052%Win rateLLWLLWLLTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +1.9pp headshot accuracy · −8ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.09
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Last 10

  • 361 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Last 20

  • 983 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 602ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility4.4
Positioning3.8
Opening Duels0.1
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 618ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning3.8
Utility4.4
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels0.6
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time632ms+8ms
first ⅓ avg 624ms → last ⅓ avg 632ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%−1.2%
first ⅓ avg 19.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.40Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 24 Aug
54%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · dust2, 4 Sept
406msFastest reaction time · 9–1 · inferno, 24 Aug
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 11 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
65In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 73% over 11dust2Weakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA27151256%-0.03
ancientC1871139%-0.04
mirageS118373%-0.02
anubisB105550%-0.02
dust2D81713%-0.06
cacheS75271%-0.04
infernoB63350%0.04
office42250%-0.06
train330100%0.04
overpass2020%-0.05
vertigo220100%-0.03
shelter110100%-0.04
italy1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

19,542Lifetime kills
0.62K/D
2,036Matches
40.5%Match win rate
42.0%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
3,595MVPs
672Hours (in match)
1,988Bombs planted
598Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-475,328
MP91,621
AWP389
HE Grenade282

Lifetime map wins

2,547nuke
2,517inferno
1,849dust2
1,413vertigo
255train
113office
44italy
1ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

117Matches
54%Win rate
0.72Avg K/D
63.2ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3554%0.6810.7
Ancient2143%0.7712.6
Nuke1958%0.7411.8
Dust21362%0.5910.5
Anubis1155%0.9811.4
Inferno850%0.5410.0
Cache771%0.729.4
Vertigo20%0.6812.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.4%Headshot accuracy
37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.4%Spray accuracy
87.2%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
618msReaction time
29.6%T opening success
35.0%CT opening success
0.37Enemies flashed / flash
2.3%Flash assists
6.53HE damage / grenade
8.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3676 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.6034% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno6–13-0.1123%16 Sept
nuke11–13-0.1210%16 Sept
ancient13–7-0.0118%16 Sept
nuke4–13-0.1024%15 Sept
mirage13–16-0.0912%15 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0023%14 Sept
dust210–13-0.0416%14 Sept
ancient14–16-0.0217%14 Sept
nuke12–120.036%12 Sept
mirage13–10.0028%11 Sept
office13–10-0.067%10 Sept
anubis13–80.0521%7 Sept
train13–20.1011%7 Sept
overpass12–12-0.0321%7 Sept
cache13–5-0.0421%7 Sept
office10–13-0.0817%7 Sept
ancient12–12-0.0513%7 Sept
nuke13–10.0910%7 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0522%7 Sept
nuke3–13-0.0616%6 Sept
anubis13–60.0228%6 Sept
dust27–13-0.0122%6 Sept
nuke10–13-0.089%6 Sept
ancient13–5-0.0121%6 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0511%6 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0110%6 Sept
mirage13–30.0416%5 Sept
nuke16–120.0315%5 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0811%4 Sept
cache9–13-0.0524%4 Sept
dust27–13-0.039%4 Sept
dust23–13-0.1254%4 Sept
office5–13-0.0724%4 Sept
dust20–13-0.060%4 Sept
vertigo13–9-0.0321%4 Sept
shelter13–6-0.0417%3 Sept
overpass12–12-0.075%3 Sept
italy7–13-0.0416%3 Sept
nuke13–7-0.0111%3 Sept
mirage13–100.0510%3 Sept
anubis5–13-0.039%2 Sept
mirage5–0-0.020%2 Sept
train13–80.0112%2 Sept
nuke13–50.0310%2 Sept
inferno13–70.0115%2 Sept
nuke13–90.0317%2 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0511%1 Sept
dust27–13-0.0812%1 Sept
mirage13–90.0320%31 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0516%31 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0722%30 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0215%30 Aug
nuke12–12-0.1123%30 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0414%30 Aug
nuke13–11-0.066%29 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0520%29 Aug
nuke6–9-0.0816%24 Aug
inferno9–10.4025%24 Aug
ancient0–4-0.120%24 Aug
anubis13–80.0313%23 Aug
nuke13–10.0023%23 Aug
nuke13–50.0218%23 Aug
cache13–10-0.065%23 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0128%23 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0315%23 Aug
cache13–11-0.0917%22 Aug
mirage13–10-0.048%22 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0628%22 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0617%22 Aug
anubis2–13-0.090%21 Aug
dust213–16-0.0818%21 Aug
nuke13–2-0.0615%21 Aug
ancient9–2-0.0818%21 Aug
train13–50.0124%21 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0318%21 Aug
ancient13–10.0135%20 Aug
ancient13–40.0118%20 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0717%20 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0718%20 Aug
inferno13–80.0024%20 Aug
ancient3–13-0.1021%20 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0616%20 Aug
nuke9–00.0414%20 Aug
inferno6–90.1027%20 Aug
nuke5–9-0.1829%19 Aug
inferno1–9-0.1743%19 Aug
vertigo13–6-0.0313%19 Aug
office13–7-0.0317%19 Aug
nuke13–10.1730%19 Aug
cache13–6-0.0220%19 Aug
ancient4–13-0.098%18 Aug
nuke13–110.0119%18 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0520%18 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0214%17 Aug
cache14–160.0113%17 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0318%17 Aug
dust216–14-0.079%17 Aug
cache13–8-0.0018%17 Aug
nuke13–30.0319%16 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0715%16 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →