Arecon

Arecon — CS2 Stats

FI76561199207258064[U:1:1246992336]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,031Tracked matches66%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,803Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,287Top 50% of 210,832 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#94954 of 257794 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,757 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Oct 2026 (17 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,287 +1,573 22 Jul – 10 Oct · 30 days played
15,72419,287peak 19,28722 Jul10 Oct
19,287Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,757Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-07-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,757
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 244 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 19,287
  • +3,563 over 30 days · improving
  • +1,573 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 713 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate49.9%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy8.1%13.0%13.2%5.1% short
Kill/death ratio0.961.061.070.11 short
Match win rate45.9%46.3%46.9%1.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAreconFACEITLevel 8 · 1,757 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,287 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,757csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning52
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–40–7Last 10053%Win rateWLLWLTWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +4.9pp headshot accuracy · −26ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 20

  • 13–6–1 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility5.9
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch4.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 562ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning5.2
Utility5.9
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time567ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 597ms → last ⅓ avg 567ms
Headshot accuracy15.4%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 16.8% → last ⅓ avg 15.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–1 · ancient, 18 Aug →
48%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · nuke, 23 Jul →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · nuke, 9 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 23 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
9–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 70% over 10infernoWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB2010–1050%0.01
dust2A1810–856%0.01
mirageA1810–856%-0.00
infernoD134–931%-0.02
anubisS107–370%0.02
cacheB105–550%0.01
ancientA85–363%0.03
overpass—11–0100%0.08
train—11–0100%0.02
vertigo—10–10%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

46,887Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
2,446Matches
45.9%Match win rate
49.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
8.1%Shot accuracy
5,215MVPs
1,000Hours (in match)
2,391Bombs planted
783Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4718,509
AWP2,502
MP9891
P250742
Knife661

Lifetime map wins

5,222nuke
3,507vertigo
3,136inferno
2,044dust2
401train
115cbble
59lake
2italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

653Matches
51%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
72.2ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage12149%0.9614.1
Nuke7764%1.0915.1
Anubis6351%0.9914.9
Dust25947%0.9314.6
Ancient4947%0.9414.9
Vertigo4156%1.0714.7
Inferno3345%0.9313.8
Overpass1338%1.1912.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.1%Headshot accuracy
38.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.1%Spray accuracy
78.3%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
562msReaction time
28.8%T opening success
41.8%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
2.5%Flash assists
8.11HE damage / grenade
10.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.7805% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–80.1428%21 Oct →
anubis5–130.0312%16 Oct →
cache9–130.0618%13 Oct →
nuke13–100.0216%10 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0217%10 Oct →
cache15–15-0.0321%3 Oct →
anubis13–70.0813%1 Oct →
mirage10–130.0116%1 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0114%30 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0116%30 Sept →
cache8–130.036%26 Sept →
dust213–70.0412%26 Sept →
mirage13–90.0212%26 Sept →
nuke13–100.0217%26 Sept →
inferno13–50.027%25 Sept →
anubis13–40.0210%20 Sept →
dust213–100.0210%20 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0618%20 Sept →
cache13–100.0214%19 Sept →
anubis13–60.0114%19 Sept →
dust213–2-0.0213%19 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0717%19 Sept →
dust213–20.1026%19 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0210%19 Sept →
ancient13–40.0515%19 Sept →
mirage9–2-0.0131%19 Sept →
inferno11–130.0116%19 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0611%12 Sept →
nuke13–40.0214%12 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0015%11 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0221%11 Sept →
nuke11–130.0413%11 Sept →
anubis13–110.0116%11 Sept →
nuke13–90.0116%9 Sept →
dust27–130.0010%2 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0714%2 Sept →
cache13–100.0923%31 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.038%30 Aug →
inferno6–130.0513%30 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.028%30 Aug →
ancient13–110.0518%25 Aug →
dust213–00.1024%23 Aug →
ancient13–30.1417%23 Aug →
anubis10–130.0315%21 Aug →
dust212–12-0.0320%18 Aug →
overpass13–100.0819%18 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0120%18 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.069%18 Aug →
ancient13–10.1413%18 Aug →
anubis13–8-0.0326%15 Aug →
mirage10–130.0116%14 Aug →
nuke11–130.0417%14 Aug →
nuke15–150.0617%13 Aug →
anubis13–70.0014%11 Aug →
inferno13–3-0.0029%11 Aug →
cache8–130.0318%11 Aug →
ancient15–15-0.0111%11 Aug →
nuke13–100.0618%9 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0325%9 Aug →
mirage13–110.0513%9 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.0224%9 Aug →
dust213–3-0.0127%8 Aug →
inferno13–6-0.0318%8 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0712%8 Aug →
nuke14–16-0.0413%8 Aug →
mirage16–140.0819%8 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0314%8 Aug →
anubis13–90.0610%8 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0417%5 Aug →
dust213–100.1115%5 Aug →
nuke11–130.0523%5 Aug →
inferno8–130.0212%4 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0224%4 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0211%4 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0220%2 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0412%2 Aug →
mirage9–130.0129%2 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.087%1 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0121%1 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0227%1 Aug →
cache13–2-0.0711%31 Jul →
ancient13–10-0.0111%31 Jul →
inferno3–13-0.039%31 Jul →
mirage13–2-0.0115%31 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.068%31 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0624%31 Jul →
train13–100.0214%26 Jul →
nuke13–10-0.0516%26 Jul →
mirage13–110.0211%26 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.048%26 Jul →
vertigo12–120.0420%26 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0430%23 Jul →
nuke13–11-0.0248%23 Jul →
mirage13–60.1325%23 Jul →
nuke13–80.0413%23 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0715%23 Jul →
nuke13–20.1022%23 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0015%22 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.058%22 Jul →
mirage15–15-0.055%22 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.