ScoobyJew

ScoobyJew — CS2 Stats

CD76561199202638614[U:1:1242372886]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,231Tracked matches60%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingPositional Player
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Sep 2026 (41 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,231 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,464 +0 1 Sept – 25 Sept · 5 observations
1,4641,464peak 1,4641 Sept25 Sept
1,464Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-02-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,464
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 67 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGScoobyJew30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,464csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning54
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58–42Last 10058%Win rateWLWWLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +11.4pp headshot accuracy · +56ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 639ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.8 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility4.9
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch3.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 566ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning5.4
Utility4.9
Mechanics4.2
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time582ms+43ms
first ⅓ avg 539ms → last ⅓ avg 582ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%+2.5%
first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 10–13 · cache, 2 Jul →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 6–5 · nuke, 19 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · anubis, 16 Feb →
13–1Biggest win · overpass, 17 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
11–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 74% over 27mirageWeakest map · 35% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS2720–774%0.01
anubisA2314–961%-0.01
mirageC176–1135%-0.01
nukeA149–564%-0.02
infernoA95–456%0.01
cache—30–30%0.06
overpass—32–167%0.00
vertigo—21–150%-0.07
dust2—21–150%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 17). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

682Matches
51%Win rate
0.91Avg K/D
75.9ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient12653%0.9314.4
Anubis12555%0.9214.3
Mirage12546%0.9014.0
Inferno11952%0.9014.6
Nuke7749%0.9014.4
Vertigo5250%0.9014.5
Overpass2650%0.8413.8
Dust21553%1.0015.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.6%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
69.0%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
566msReaction time
37.8%T opening success
42.7%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
6.86HE damage / grenade
4.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.8033% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke6–5-0.14100%19 Sept →
cache10–130.1823%2 Jul →
vertigo13–70.1114%2 Jul →
anubis13–100.017%14 May →
cache3–130.008%14 May →
vertigo1–9-0.2630%14 May →
cache5–13-0.0122%1 May →
nuke13–9-0.0330%28 Apr →
inferno17–19-0.0212%27 Apr →
overpass7–130.0220%25 Apr →
anubis13–11-0.0110%25 Apr →
ancient13–4-0.0323%23 Apr →
anubis13–6-0.0014%23 Apr →
ancient13–11-0.0223%23 Apr →
nuke13–100.0213%21 Apr →
inferno12–16-0.0213%17 Apr →
ancient13–70.0623%16 Apr →
mirage13–80.0410%13 Apr →
mirage11–130.0716%13 Apr →
mirage13–40.009%13 Apr →
anubis13–6-0.0226%12 Apr →
mirage10–130.0213%12 Apr →
ancient13–110.0227%12 Apr →
nuke6–130.0119%12 Apr →
mirage2–13-0.0712%12 Apr →
anubis11–130.0020%12 Apr →
anubis10–130.0119%11 Apr →
ancient13–11-0.0511%11 Apr →
ancient13–80.0416%27 Mar →
ancient13–60.0219%26 Mar →
anubis13–9-0.0128%26 Mar →
mirage11–13-0.059%26 Mar →
ancient13–60.0718%26 Mar →
inferno19–17-0.0419%22 Mar →
nuke13–6-0.0317%22 Mar →
ancient13–160.0016%21 Mar →
mirage13–10-0.0328%21 Mar →
anubis7–13-0.0520%20 Mar →
ancient13–16-0.0214%18 Mar →
anubis13–8-0.069%17 Mar →
overpass13–1-0.0611%17 Mar →
anubis16–140.0815%17 Mar →
inferno16–140.0116%16 Mar →
inferno13–16-0.0213%10 Mar →
anubis13–40.0110%10 Mar →
nuke13–70.0813%10 Mar →
inferno13–60.0323%10 Mar →
dust28–130.0115%7 Mar →
ancient13–60.0311%7 Mar →
anubis9–13-0.0210%6 Mar →
anubis13–110.0213%6 Mar →
ancient7–13-0.0922%4 Mar →
mirage13–5-0.0712%4 Mar →
anubis6–13-0.062%4 Mar →
mirage2–130.0317%2 Mar →
ancient11–130.0724%2 Mar →
ancient13–60.1016%1 Mar →
anubis13–6-0.0712%1 Mar →
nuke14–16-0.0411%27 Feb →
anubis13–8-0.0111%27 Feb →
inferno13–70.0331%25 Feb →
nuke19–16-0.0013%24 Feb →
inferno13–100.0125%24 Feb →
ancient13–4-0.0415%22 Feb →
anubis3–13-0.1224%22 Feb →
ancient13–40.0724%22 Feb →
ancient13–70.0119%22 Feb →
ancient13–2-0.057%21 Feb →
inferno13–160.0621%21 Feb →
ancient13–50.027%21 Feb →
ancient13–11-0.0420%21 Feb →
nuke9–13-0.0425%21 Feb →
ancient10–13-0.0329%20 Feb →
anubis8–13-0.0117%20 Feb →
mirage13–20.0036%20 Feb →
ancient13–11-0.0130%20 Feb →
anubis10–13-0.0114%20 Feb →
ancient13–8-0.0115%19 Feb →
nuke16–130.0011%19 Feb →
mirage7–130.0322%19 Feb →
ancient13–80.0519%18 Feb →
anubis13–30.0110%18 Feb →
mirage5–130.0015%17 Feb →
anubis13–40.0517%17 Feb →
nuke6–13-0.0311%17 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0317%17 Feb →
anubis6–13-0.0519%16 Feb →
ancient11–13-0.0216%16 Feb →
dust213–8-0.0341%16 Feb →
overpass13–40.0521%16 Feb →
nuke13–7-0.0113%15 Feb →
mirage7–130.0116%15 Feb →
nuke13–10-0.015%14 Feb →
nuke4–13-0.019%14 Feb →
mirage2–13-0.1014%14 Feb →
anubis13–60.0520%14 Feb →
mirage13–60.0417%14 Feb →
ancient7–130.0013%14 Feb →
mirage11–13-0.0317%14 Feb →
ancient13–30.008%13 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.