Raimz™

Raimz™ — CS2 Stats

FI76561199195879963[U:1:1235614235]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,894Tracked matches41%Win rate2021Tracked since
6,629Hours in CS68Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating4,187Grey band · top ~82.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 24 days played since 21 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 4,187 -464 22 Aug17 Sept · 19 days played
3,9565,330peak 5,33022 Aug17 Sept
5,583Peak Premier in tracked matches
24Days played since 2026-08-21

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,143 below peak (5,330)
  • -464 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Light Blue band at 5,000 813 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,197), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate59.6%41.3%41.9%above
Shot accuracy6.1%12.7%12.2%6.1% short
Kill/death ratio1.410.960.98above
Match win rate31.2%42.5%43.3%12.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRaimz™FACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER4,187 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning63
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49474Last 10049%Win rateWWLLLLTLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +2.2pp headshot accuracy · −3ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Last 20

  • 7121 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility4.3
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 67% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 67% on T to 48% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 636ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning6.3
Utility4.3
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels6.9
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time637ms−10ms
first ⅓ avg 647ms → last ⅓ avg 637ms
Headshot accuracy16.9%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 18.2% → last ⅓ avg 16.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–9 · ancient, 3 Sept
37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · inferno, 23 Aug
484msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · inferno, 17 Sept
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 23 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
610In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 56% over 9nukeWeakest map · 43% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B26121446%-0.02
mirageB25121348%-0.02
infernoC167944%-0.01
anubisB126650%-0.01
ancientA95456%0.00
nukeC73443%-0.01
cache43175%-0.02
overpass110100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

195,842Lifetime kills
1.41K/D · Top 5% of Level 2 players
7,945Matches
31.2%Match win rate
59.6%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 2 players
6.1%Shot accuracy
11,799MVPs
3,185Hours (in match)
3,157Bombs planted
956Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4781,257
AWP23,521
FAMAS4,554
SSG 081,918
MAC-101,594

Lifetime map wins

9,996dust2
8,192inferno
4,378nuke
2,061vertigo
680train
633office
35cbble
13ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

906Matches
48%Win rate
0.82Avg K/D
63.5ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage14550%0.8113.3
Dust29451%0.7711.4
Inferno9153%0.7711.8
Anubis8151%0.7311.5
Nuke4238%0.7812.0
Ancient3936%0.8113.2
Overpass989%1.0315.3
Vertigo944%0.8414.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.6%Spray accuracy
78.3%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
636msReaction time
66.7%T opening success
48.2%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
7.48HE damage / grenade
6.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–5-0.0127%17 Sept
ancient13–70.0118%16 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0113%16 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0219%16 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0315%16 Sept
mirage11–130.0114%15 Sept
inferno15–15-0.0215%15 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0417%15 Sept
cache13–30.0414%15 Sept
dust213–80.0327%15 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0112%14 Sept
ancient13–7-0.0121%14 Sept
nuke14–160.0123%14 Sept
nuke13–7-0.0410%14 Sept
dust21–8-0.070%14 Sept
mirage13–110.0120%14 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0221%13 Sept
mirage1–13-0.0623%13 Sept
dust29–13-0.089%13 Sept
dust27–130.0515%12 Sept
mirage11–130.0325%12 Sept
anubis3–13-0.0311%12 Sept
mirage9–80.0312%11 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0820%11 Sept
mirage13–40.0424%11 Sept
dust213–40.0124%10 Sept
cache13–7-0.0313%10 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0217%10 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0421%10 Sept
ancient10–13-0.049%10 Sept
anubis14–160.0013%7 Sept
inferno13–4-0.0216%7 Sept
dust213–9-0.0523%7 Sept
mirage13–110.0010%7 Sept
mirage13–2-0.049%7 Sept
dust213–50.0321%7 Sept
mirage13–9-0.026%7 Sept
nuke13–3-0.076%7 Sept
mirage13–5-0.0113%7 Sept
inferno2–13-0.0816%5 Sept
ancient11–130.0122%4 Sept
mirage9–13-0.008%4 Sept
mirage6–130.0117%4 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0219%3 Sept
cache13–10-0.0118%3 Sept
dust27–13-0.0818%3 Sept
ancient13–90.1511%3 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0123%3 Sept
anubis7–10.0318%2 Sept
mirage13–5-0.0223%2 Sept
nuke13–80.0614%2 Sept
dust213–4-0.069%2 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0015%2 Sept
dust213–6-0.0013%1 Sept
dust21–13-0.0316%1 Sept
inferno13–60.0417%1 Sept
anubis13–7-0.018%1 Sept
mirage12–12-0.0435%1 Sept
dust25–13-0.1119%30 Aug
mirage5–13-0.088%30 Aug
dust213–6-0.089%30 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0817%29 Aug
cache5–13-0.077%29 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0514%29 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0612%29 Aug
dust211–13-0.0028%29 Aug
ancient13–40.0620%29 Aug
ancient13–7-0.1013%28 Aug
dust25–13-0.0219%28 Aug
dust213–60.0315%28 Aug
inferno5–130.0132%27 Aug
anubis15–150.0419%27 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0418%27 Aug
inferno13–90.0112%26 Aug
mirage13–80.0322%26 Aug
anubis16–140.0416%26 Aug
dust213–6-0.0122%25 Aug
dust26–13-0.0431%25 Aug
mirage13–100.0010%25 Aug
dust26–130.029%25 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0623%25 Aug
inferno6–130.0615%25 Aug
anubis4–13-0.049%24 Aug
dust213–160.0018%24 Aug
mirage12–160.0111%24 Aug
anubis13–100.048%24 Aug
dust213–90.0213%24 Aug
dust213–90.0616%24 Aug
inferno12–12-0.0520%23 Aug
overpass13–3-0.0123%23 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0814%23 Aug
dust25–13-0.0421%23 Aug
anubis13–2-0.070%23 Aug
inferno13–1-0.0137%23 Aug
dust211–13-0.0033%23 Aug
inferno16–130.0116%22 Aug
dust21–13-0.0425%22 Aug
inferno13–10.1229%22 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0414%22 Aug
dust213–8-0.0119%21 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →