GiveawaySign In
LIL JIMMY

LIL JIMMY — CS2 Stats

76561199195695621[U:1:1235429893]Steam profile ↗1 game ban

1,308Tracked matches54%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,609Hours in CS41Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating8.7 ElitePositional Player
Premier CS Rating27,904Top 5% of 204,793 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2673 of 251921 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+286Premier CS Rating · 27,618 → 27,904

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,904 +2,368 28 Aug – 15 Oct · 9 days played
25,53628,143peak 28,14328 Aug15 Oct
28,143Peak Premier in tracked matches
33Days played since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 239 below peak (28,143)
  • +967 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 2,096 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,591), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate51.0%48.2%50.9%meets
Shot accuracy11.8%13.3%13.7%2.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.481.071.09above
Match win rate55.5%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLIL JIMMYFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER27,904 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim94
Positioning84
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–32–12Last 10056%Win rateLWLWLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +4.5pp headshot accuracy · +37ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 505ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 487ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim9.4
Utility5.5
Positioning8.4
Opening Duels8.3
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerStrong positioning

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: higher opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 71% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

T openings. 72% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4
Positioning8.4
Utility5.5
Mechanics8.8
Opening Duels10.0
Win Impact6.2

Composite 8.7/10 (Elite), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time504ms+1ms
first ⅓ avg 503ms → last ⅓ avg 504ms
Headshot accuracy22.2%−2.6%
first ⅓ avg 24.8% → last ⅓ avg 22.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.47Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 19 Sept →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 2–9 · inferno, 13 Sept →
359msFastest reaction time · 11–2 · inferno, 8 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 9 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 62% over 13cacheWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA4727–2057%0.08
dust2B158–753%0.08
mirageA138–562%0.05
nukeA74–357%0.06
cacheC52–340%-0.01
ancientC52–340%0.04
vertigo—43–175%0.08
overpass—32–167%0.10
anubis—10–10%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

50,129Lifetime kills
1.48K/D · Top 10% of Level 9 players
2,297Matches
55.5%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 9 players
51.0%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
11.8%Shot accuracy
8,543MVPs
762Hours (in match)
2,649Bombs planted
1,020Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4716,509
AWP8,850
M4A4 / M4A1-S6,417
Desert Eagle4,153
P2000 / USP-S3,908
Glock-182,351
MP91,231
MAG-7930
SSG 08898
Galil AR768

Lifetime map wins

4,882dust2
4,584inferno
1,252nuke
507vertigo
220train
183office
3ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

78Matches
74%Win rate
1.69Avg K/D
104.0ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3385%1.7922.6
Inferno1479%1.9622.1
Dust2967%1.8222.1
Ancient850%1.0416.8
Cache367%1.4215.0
Vertigo367%2.1724.3
Nuke2100%1.3222.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.0%Headshot accuracy
42.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.6%Spray accuracy
89.4%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
521msReaction time
71.8%T opening success
71.1%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
3.3%Flash assists
7.42HE damage / grenade
9.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–130.0323%15 Oct →
inferno13–110.0123%15 Oct →
dust211–130.1227%15 Oct →
dust213–50.1636%15 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0320%14 Oct →
dust28–130.0323%14 Oct →
mirage13–50.0922%13 Oct →
inferno6–90.0923%13 Oct →
inferno13–40.0320%12 Oct →
dust27–130.0229%12 Oct →
mirage13–100.0416%12 Oct →
inferno13–50.0626%12 Oct →
inferno8–80.1311%12 Oct →
inferno10–130.0418%10 Oct →
inferno5–9-0.0924%10 Oct →
inferno9–10.0824%10 Oct →
inferno1–9-0.1320%10 Oct →
inferno13–10.0120%9 Oct →
mirage13–60.0728%8 Oct →
inferno11–20.0314%8 Oct →
dust213–110.0930%8 Oct →
cache12–12-0.0217%7 Oct →
dust213–40.0922%7 Oct →
inferno8–80.1412%6 Oct →
inferno9–10.1630%6 Oct →
overpass7–90.0726%6 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0426%4 Oct →
nuke8–80.0715%3 Oct →
vertigo9–00.0511%3 Oct →
inferno14–160.0220%30 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0214%29 Sept →
dust213–30.1935%29 Sept →
inferno9–60.1528%27 Sept →
cache1–100.0032%27 Sept →
mirage4–130.0418%27 Sept →
inferno8–80.0241%26 Sept →
inferno9–10.3836%26 Sept →
inferno8–80.0622%26 Sept →
inferno9–40.1529%26 Sept →
nuke9–20.1421%26 Sept →
cache13–110.0625%26 Sept →
cache13–90.0033%26 Sept →
nuke13–90.0927%26 Sept →
nuke0–9-0.2117%24 Sept →
mirage15–150.009%23 Sept →
inferno9–10.4729%19 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0832%19 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0516%18 Sept →
inferno9–50.2029%17 Sept →
inferno13–10.1136%17 Sept →
inferno5–9-0.1731%17 Sept →
inferno9–60.1023%16 Sept →
dust212–120.1129%16 Sept →
dust213–110.1037%15 Sept →
inferno6–9-0.0331%15 Sept →
inferno6–90.0623%14 Sept →
inferno8–80.1233%14 Sept →
vertigo9–20.1533%13 Sept →
inferno9–30.2221%13 Sept →
nuke9–20.2827%13 Sept →
inferno9–40.0242%13 Sept →
inferno9–10.3514%13 Sept →
inferno9–70.1627%13 Sept →
inferno9–10.2517%13 Sept →
inferno9–70.1240%13 Sept →
inferno2–9-0.1045%13 Sept →
nuke9–70.0536%13 Sept →
inferno9–30.0140%13 Sept →
dust213–50.1619%13 Sept →
mirage13–80.0516%13 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0835%12 Sept →
inferno8–80.0337%12 Sept →
inferno8–8-0.0127%12 Sept →
overpass9–30.2221%12 Sept →
inferno9–20.1432%12 Sept →
dust212–120.0224%10 Sept →
cache6–13-0.080%10 Sept →
inferno9–40.0633%10 Sept →
dust213–70.0331%9 Sept →
ancient13–100.1522%8 Sept →
inferno13–50.1438%8 Sept →
inferno10–130.0123%8 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0017%8 Sept →
mirage13–80.1229%7 Sept →
ancient13–90.0216%7 Sept →
vertigo10–13-0.0119%7 Sept →
inferno13–30.1017%7 Sept →
mirage13–60.1539%7 Sept →
dust213–50.1528%7 Sept →
overpass9–50.0111%7 Sept →
inferno14–160.0327%6 Sept →
vertigo13–20.1217%6 Sept →
mirage13–100.1024%6 Sept →
inferno9–60.1621%6 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0720%5 Sept →
mirage13–110.0417%4 Sept →
inferno13–80.0716%4 Sept →
mirage3–11-0.0435%3 Sept →
ancient2–70.1228%3 Sept →
inferno3–9-0.0642%3 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.

Explore CSDB.gg

Related

Sensitivity ConverterConvert sensitivity between CS2 and other gameseDPI CalculatorCalculate your effective DPIcm/360 CalculatorMouse distance per full turnResolution CalculatorCompare aspect ratios and resolutionsCrosshair GeneratorBuild and preview custom crosshairs

Tools

CS2 Skin WordleName the skin from an extreme close-upModel AccuracyPrediction model accuracy statsTeam Head-to-HeadCompare pro team stats

Learn & Explore

CS2 vs Rainbow Six SiegeDestructibility and operators vs pure utilityCS2 Player Roles ExplainedEntry, support, AWPer, lurker, IGLCS2 Fixes & TroubleshootingStep-by-step fixes for every common CS2 problem