✞𝓏33𝒸𝓊𝓈✞ — CS2 Stats

FI76561199192299152[U:1:1232033424]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,623Tracked matches46%Win rate2021Tracked since

3,530Hours in CS27Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPositional Player

Premier CS Rating8,578Light Blue band · top ~61.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#175208 of 237874 tracked

FaceitLevel 7 · 1,214 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 8,578 → 8,578

0Faceit ELO · 1,214 → 1,214

+8Tracked matches · now 2,623

−12.2ppWin rate · 58.6% → 46.4%

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 24 days played since 4 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 8,578 +71 7 Sept – 19 Sept · 7 days played

9,999Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,214Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

24Days played since 2026-08-04

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,214
Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 137 to go
Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
Level 6 first seen 2026-09-19
Level 5 first seen 2026-09-19

Premier CS Rating

1,015 below peak (9,593)
Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 1,422 to go
Reached: Light Blue band
Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-19

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,070), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 7 median	Level 8 median	vs Level 8
Headshot rate	46.9%	45.7%	46.8%	meets
Shot accuracy	4.5%	12.7%	13.0%	8.5% short
Kill/death ratio	0.97	1.05	1.06	0.10 short
Match win rate	42.0%	45.7%	46.3%	4.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74

Positioning70

Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45–44–11Last 10045%Win rateTLLTWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · −4.9pp headshot accuracy · +21ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

1–2–2 · 20% win rate
Avg rating -0.04
Avg headshot accuracy 17%
Avg reaction 630ms

Last 10

2–6–2 · 20% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 20%
Avg reaction 578ms

Last 20

6–10–4 · 30% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 22%
Avg reaction 568ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.4

Utility6.9

Positioning7.0

Opening Duels4.0

Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 64% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 568ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4

Positioning7.0

Utility6.9

Mechanics3.6

Opening Duels7.0

Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time563ms−16ms

first ⅓ avg 579ms → last ⅓ avg 563ms

Headshot accuracy23.9%−2.4%

first ⅓ avg 26.3% → last ⅓ avg 23.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.29Best match rating · 13–2 · inferno, 16 Aug →

50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · office, 9 Aug →

359msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · overpass, 7 Aug →

13–0Biggest win · nuke, 6 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak

4–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

2Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 12vertigoWeakest map · 20% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	D	20	6–14	30%	0.02
ancient	A	13	8–5	62%	0.05
nuke	S	12	8–4	67%	0.03
cache	A	11	6–5	55%	0.02
dust2	C	10	4–6	40%	0.02
anubis	C	9	4–5	44%	0.01
mirage	C	9	4–5	44%	0.05
vertigo	D	5	1–4	20%	0.03
overpass	C	5	2–3	40%	-0.04
train	—	3	0–3	0%	0.02
boulder	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.00
shelter	—	1	0–1	0%	0.14
office	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

79,040Lifetime kills

0.97K/D

4,503Matches

42.0%Match win rate

46.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players

4.5%Shot accuracy

8,947MVPs

1,627Hours (in match)

3,241Bombs planted

1,131Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4725,620

M4A4 / M4A1-S12,826

AWP7,479

P2000 / USP-S3,815

Desert Eagle3,719

SSG 083,444

MP93,329

Glock-183,150

Galil AR2,074

MAC-101,936

Lifetime map wins

7,104inferno

6,883dust2

4,370nuke

2,751vertigo

1,782train

404lake

296cbble

147safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

455Matches

44%Win rate

0.91Avg K/D

74.7ADR

46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

17%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Nuke	83	49%	0.92	14.3
Mirage	80	41%	0.97	14.6
Ancient	78	40%	0.99	15.6
Inferno	73	41%	0.82	12.9
Dust2	43	49%	0.97	15.0
Anubis	41	49%	0.85	14.1
Vertigo	27	37%	0.72	11.3
Train	20	50%	0.83	12.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.8%Headshot accuracy

37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

42.4%Spray accuracy

66.2%Counter-strafing

10.6°Preaim

568msReaction time

64.1%T opening success

51.8%CT opening success

0.69Enemies flashed / flash

6.1%Flash assists

8.19HE damage / grenade

21.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategy →Vertigo grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	12–12	-0.05	12%	22 Sept →
vertigo	3–13	-0.08	15%	22 Sept →
dust2	2–13	-0.03	22%	20 Sept →
ancient	12–12	-0.02	14%	20 Sept →
cache	13–8	-0.02	24%	19 Sept →
inferno	5–13	-0.03	21%	19 Sept →
nuke	13–8	0.01	12%	19 Sept →
inferno	8–13	-0.01	46%	19 Sept →
nuke	11–13	0.01	14%	18 Sept →
mirage	7–13	0.09	19%	18 Sept →
nuke	10–13	0.06	31%	18 Sept →
inferno	8–8	-0.04	21%	18 Sept →
mirage	6–13	0.07	30%	17 Sept →
nuke	8–13	-0.03	18%	17 Sept →
anubis	13–5	0.05	17%	17 Sept →
inferno	13–2	0.16	24%	17 Sept →
ancient	13–6	0.06	30%	17 Sept →
nuke	13–4	0.07	40%	17 Sept →
mirage	4–13	-0.01	10%	17 Sept →
inferno	8–8	-0.04	26%	17 Sept →
nuke	16–14	0.03	28%	15 Sept →
ancient	7–13	0.00	15%	15 Sept →
mirage	13–9	0.01	23%	15 Sept →
mirage	13–3	0.13	40%	15 Sept →
nuke	13–11	0.06	28%	15 Sept →
ancient	13–6	0.08	30%	15 Sept →
inferno	11–13	0.04	27%	15 Sept →
anubis	10–13	0.08	18%	14 Sept →
dust2	4–13	0.03	30%	13 Sept →
cache	13–8	0.01	34%	13 Sept →
inferno	13–2	-0.00	31%	13 Sept →
inferno	6–9	-0.15	21%	13 Sept →
ancient	10–13	0.01	22%	12 Sept →
cache	15–15	0.14	24%	12 Sept →
cache	13–2	0.03	31%	12 Sept →
nuke	13–8	0.11	26%	12 Sept →
inferno	13–7	-0.02	23%	12 Sept →
cache	13–2	0.07	30%	8 Sept →
ancient	13–9	0.02	26%	8 Sept →
anubis	13–6	0.03	32%	8 Sept →
anubis	8–13	-0.04	24%	7 Sept →
cache	13–10	0.00	32%	7 Sept →
inferno	9–6	0.11	33%	7 Sept →
cache	5–13	-0.05	22%	4 Sept →
ancient	5–13	0.04	23%	4 Sept →
inferno	11–13	0.03	31%	4 Sept →
nuke	7–13	-0.03	24%	4 Sept →
ancient	13–3	0.14	25%	4 Sept →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	27%	4 Sept →
anubis	11–13	0.01	27%	2 Sept →
overpass	12–12	-0.05	14%	2 Sept →
inferno	12–12	0.01	33%	2 Sept →
inferno	13–2	-0.01	32%	24 Aug →
overpass	13–3	-0.02	27%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.29	24%	16 Aug →
vertigo	1–13	-0.04	43%	16 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.03	22%	16 Aug →
inferno	5–9	0.10	27%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.21	28%	15 Aug →
train	6–13	0.00	18%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.08	15%	15 Aug →
inferno	5–9	-0.01	33%	11 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.04	22%	10 Aug →
overpass	13–2	0.01	26%	10 Aug →
dust2	12–12	-0.02	30%	9 Aug →
boulder	10–4	-0.00	24%	9 Aug →
shelter	10–13	0.14	43%	9 Aug →
train	11–13	0.05	31%	9 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.06	36%	9 Aug →
office	13–2	-0.01	50%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–1	0.10	22%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.01	18%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.00	23%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.03	27%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.03	21%	8 Aug →
overpass	12–12	-0.06	15%	8 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	18%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.11	31%	8 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.15	34%	8 Aug →
train	6–13	0.00	27%	7 Aug →
cache	3–9	-0.02	50%	7 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.02	17%	7 Aug →
overpass	0–13	-0.10	27%	7 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.03	21%	7 Aug →
cache	12–12	0.03	28%	7 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.04	26%	7 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.02	23%	6 Aug →
vertigo	13–1	0.15	46%	6 Aug →
dust2	3–13	0.00	38%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–0	0.05	9%	6 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	21%	6 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.02	13%	6 Aug →
ancient	10–1	0.01	31%	6 Aug →
inferno	0–13	-0.04	29%	6 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	21%	6 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.01	15%	5 Aug →
vertigo	6–13	0.02	19%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.15	29%	5 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.07	24%	5 Aug →
vertigo	7–13	0.10	29%	4 Aug →