Benzik

Benzik — CS2 Stats

IM76561199172731768[U:1:1212466040]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

818Tracked matches45%Win rate2021Tracked since
992Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating23,798Top 25% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#35062 of 261517 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,798 +4,501 15 Jul – 6 Nov · 32 days played
19,29725,110peak 25,11015 Jul6 Nov
25,110Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,374Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-07-15

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,312 below peak (25,110)
  • +740 over 30 days · improving
  • +386 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,202 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate41.8%44.8%45.7%3.9% short
Shot accuracy2.8%12.4%12.7%10.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.071.031.05meets
Match win rate50.4%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBenzikFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER23,798 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,374csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning44
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–44–1Last 10055%Win rateTWLWWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.10 avg rating · −2.8pp headshot accuracy · −81ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.10
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 389ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.10
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 395ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 436ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility5.6
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong T-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Flashes. 0.75 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 42 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 52% on T to 28% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning4.4
Utility5.6
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time474ms−68ms
first ⅓ avg 542ms → last ⅓ avg 474ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.31Best match rating · 9–2 · inferno, 19 Oct →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · mirage, 25 Sept →
227msFastest reaction time · 5–9 · inferno, 19 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 24 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 100% over 9cacheWeakest map · 43% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B3116–1552%0.05
mirageC188–1044%0.03
ancientA149–564%0.08
infernoB147–750%0.05
nukeS99–0100%0.09
cacheC73–443%0.07
anubis—43–175%0.03
office—20–20%0.12
train—10–10%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

45,322Lifetime kills
1.07K/D · Top 50% of Level 6 players
2,443Matches
50.4%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 6 players
41.8%Headshot %
2.8%Shot accuracy
5,880MVPs
992Hours (in match)
3,178Bombs planted
560Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,863dust2
2,935inferno
2,104nuke
686vertigo
545office
508train
163lake
67italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

397Matches
53%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
81.7ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10254%1.2116.1
Dust27845%1.1116.5
Ancient6152%1.1817.9
Inferno4363%1.3416.8
Anubis4248%1.0616.4
Nuke3557%1.4717.8
Cache1258%1.0016.1
Overpass1164%1.3817.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
38.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
77.7%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
456msReaction time
52.5%T opening success
27.7%CT opening success
0.75Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
12.37HE damage / grenade
7.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 27.7088% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust215–150.0822%6 Nov →
ancient13–80.0723%5 Nov →
mirage7–130.0124%29 Oct →
dust213–110.2016%23 Oct →
dust213–40.1419%23 Oct →
dust213–40.0916%23 Oct →
inferno9–20.318%19 Oct →
inferno5–9-0.0013%19 Oct →
dust213–10.0711%13 Oct →
dust22–70.058%13 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0711%13 Oct →
mirage3–130.0221%6 Oct →
dust213–10.039%1 Oct →
dust28–130.0719%26 Sept →
cache1–13-0.028%26 Sept →
cache11–00.1315%26 Sept →
mirage7–130.1119%26 Sept →
dust25–130.0220%25 Sept →
mirage0–13-0.0667%25 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.160%23 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0113%12 Sept →
dust27–30.1214%12 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0315%12 Sept →
dust21–13-0.095%12 Sept →
mirage11–130.0111%10 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.054%9 Sept →
mirage2–90.0042%7 Sept →
ancient8–130.1316%7 Sept →
inferno1–9-0.1212%7 Sept →
ancient13–40.0710%26 Aug →
cache13–110.1117%25 Aug →
cache13–30.1522%25 Aug →
train0–2-0.060%25 Aug →
mirage0–7-0.0338%20 Aug →
dust213–100.0924%19 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0319%19 Aug →
mirage13–20.1632%18 Aug →
dust213–90.0717%13 Aug →
mirage13–70.1119%13 Aug →
inferno14–160.1017%10 Aug →
dust24–130.0628%10 Aug →
office7–130.1514%10 Aug →
dust25–130.0920%5 Aug →
ancient9–130.1013%5 Aug →
dust25–130.1319%5 Aug →
inferno9–40.238%4 Aug →
nuke16–140.0814%2 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0116%31 Jul →
ancient13–70.087%31 Jul →
nuke13–80.0816%30 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0212%29 Jul →
mirage13–10.0515%29 Jul →
dust20–13-0.090%27 Jul →
dust216–130.1418%27 Jul →
ancient7–130.0418%27 Jul →
cache11–130.0115%27 Jul →
dust213–50.0614%27 Jul →
ancient13–100.0411%27 Jul →
ancient7–130.018%26 Jul →
ancient13–60.0215%26 Jul →
inferno13–40.0519%26 Jul →
mirage13–60.0010%26 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0125%26 Jul →
inferno13–70.0420%26 Jul →
ancient13–60.0911%26 Jul →
ancient13–50.0511%26 Jul →
mirage8–130.1225%26 Jul →
nuke13–70.0420%26 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0415%25 Jul →
cache2–130.0515%25 Jul →
dust213–40.1320%25 Jul →
cache5–130.0731%24 Jul →
anubis13–30.0717%24 Jul →
dust216–120.0814%24 Jul →
nuke13–50.0220%24 Jul →
mirage13–00.0517%24 Jul →
inferno13–6-0.0026%24 Jul →
dust213–80.0213%23 Jul →
mirage13–90.0214%23 Jul →
dust22–130.1833%23 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0317%23 Jul →
ancient13–90.1114%23 Jul →
dust213–110.1411%22 Jul →
ancient13–10.219%22 Jul →
nuke13–20.2518%22 Jul →
inferno7–40.0935%22 Jul →
nuke16–140.1019%22 Jul →
nuke16–120.0712%22 Jul →
inferno13–110.1125%22 Jul →
ancient10–130.0811%21 Jul →
nuke13–70.1213%21 Jul →
anubis13–80.0613%21 Jul →
inferno4–13-0.0117%20 Jul →
office7–130.1019%18 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0513%17 Jul →
inferno9–130.0423%17 Jul →
nuke13–90.0313%16 Jul →
anubis13–90.018%16 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0630%16 Jul →
mirage13–110.0118%15 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.