P4wderr

P4wderr — CS2 Stats

76561199171415342[U:1:1211149614]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

551Tracked matches52%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating13,534Blue band · top ~36.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,146 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 33 days played since 24 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,534 +94 24 Jul – 23 Sept · 33 days played
11,87814,344peak 14,34424 Jul23 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,146 +0 6 Sept – 10 Sept · 2 observations
1,1461,146peak 1,1466 Sept10 Sept
14,978Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,146Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-07-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,146
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 55 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier CS Rating

  • 810 below peak (14,344)
  • +786 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,466 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGP4wderrFACEITLevel 5 · 1,146 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER13,534 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,146csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning58
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43–52–5Last 10043%Win rateLLLLWWLLWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · +3.3pp headshot accuracy · −59ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 562ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim5.0
Utility4.8
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels1.0
Clutch4.4

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 68% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 50% on T to 23% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 582ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 61% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning5.8
Utility4.8
Mechanics2.5
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact5.6

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time577ms−3ms
first ⅓ avg 581ms → last ⅓ avg 577ms
Headshot accuracy16.9%+7.7%
first ⅓ avg 9.2% → last ⅓ avg 16.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–2 · anubis, 5 Aug →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · mirage, 14 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · mirage, 9 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 9 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L4Current streak
6–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 57% over 23dust2Weakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2313–1057%-0.01
infernoC219–1243%-0.00
ancientC177–1041%-0.03
nukeC146–843%-0.02
anubisB126–650%-0.01
dust2D61–517%-0.02
cacheD61–517%-0.03
vertigo—10–10%-0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

68Matches
57%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
69.8ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1644%0.8511.6
Inferno1464%0.8812.7
Dust21258%0.7712.2
Ancient1080%0.9413.5
Nuke875%1.0913.3
Overpass520%0.9013.8
Vertigo333%0.6411.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.9%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.8%Spray accuracy
61.4%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
582msReaction time
49.7%T opening success
23.2%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
3.5%Flash assists
7.66HE damage / grenade
10.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4607 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 23.2241% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust21–13-0.0631%23 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0317%23 Sept →
dust20–13-0.0319%15 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0621%15 Sept →
mirage13–100.0318%15 Sept →
mirage13–60.0438%14 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.068%14 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.1018%14 Sept →
inferno16–14-0.0215%14 Sept →
cache15–150.0220%14 Sept →
anubis0–10-0.120%13 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.059%13 Sept →
mirage13–110.0015%13 Sept →
nuke13–40.0924%11 Sept →
inferno13–80.1130%10 Sept →
mirage13–100.0520%9 Sept →
dust213–40.0329%9 Sept →
mirage13–20.0620%9 Sept →
mirage13–90.0013%8 Sept →
inferno13–40.0512%2 Sept →
nuke15–150.0119%2 Sept →
mirage13–100.0213%2 Sept →
dust28–130.0317%2 Sept →
mirage8–130.0110%2 Sept →
nuke13–16-0.0217%1 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0510%1 Sept →
anubis16–130.046%31 Aug →
inferno10–130.0419%31 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0417%31 Aug →
inferno15–15-0.0210%30 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0315%30 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.046%30 Aug →
mirage13–4-0.0421%28 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.025%27 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.089%27 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0610%27 Aug →
anubis0–12-0.1210%27 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0115%26 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.0618%25 Aug →
cache13–8-0.035%25 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0218%25 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.073%25 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.029%24 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0211%22 Aug →
ancient13–20.0513%22 Aug →
ancient9–130.0113%22 Aug →
anubis13–90.018%22 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0318%22 Aug →
mirage0–13-0.0312%22 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0317%19 Aug →
ancient11–130.005%19 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0316%19 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0111%18 Aug →
inferno13–100.0216%18 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0410%17 Aug →
inferno13–60.019%17 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.046%16 Aug →
inferno13–50.052%16 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0317%16 Aug →
cache11–13-0.032%16 Aug →
mirage2–9-0.070%11 Aug →
anubis13–50.0410%11 Aug →
ancient12–4-0.0314%11 Aug →
ancient13–4-0.108%11 Aug →
cache11–13-0.075%10 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0813%9 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0311%8 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.088%8 Aug →
nuke13–100.0915%8 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.048%8 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0812%8 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0412%8 Aug →
inferno13–70.017%8 Aug →
mirage16–13-0.024%8 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.059%7 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.064%7 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.018%7 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0511%6 Aug →
inferno9–130.0110%6 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.047%6 Aug →
inferno11–130.048%6 Aug →
nuke13–60.0210%6 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0511%5 Aug →
dust27–13-0.048%5 Aug →
anubis13–20.115%5 Aug →
ancient13–30.037%5 Aug →
anubis15–150.028%4 Aug →
nuke14–16-0.014%4 Aug →
vertigo7–9-0.1115%4 Aug →
inferno5–9-0.0223%4 Aug →
mirage13–30.0012%4 Aug →
mirage13–20.0214%4 Aug →
anubis16–120.0813%4 Aug →
ancient15–15-0.069%3 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.015%2 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.016%2 Aug →
nuke0–9-0.230%2 Aug →
anubis13–60.019%24 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.016%24 Jul →
mirage1–13-0.0113%24 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →