_c0mplex — CS2 Stats

76561199165786991[U:1:1205521263]

3,115Tracked matches43%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,312Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4094 of 22428 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,211 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG_c0mplexFACEITLevel 10 · 2,211 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER24,312 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92
Positioning61
Utility29

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD4753Last 10047%Win rateWLLLLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.2
Aggression8.2
Utility2.9
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 66% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 66% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 552ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2
Positioning6.1
Utility2.9
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact2.8

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time563ms−31ms
first ⅓ avg 594ms → last ⅓ avg 563ms
Headshot accuracy24.5%−5.8%
first ⅓ avg 30.3% → last ⅓ avg 24.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — inferno 9–2
130Biggest win — inferno
4Longest win streak
68In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 71% over 7mirageWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC2281436%0.01
anubisA2012860%0.02
nukeS1510567%0.02
dust2B136746%0.01
mirageD1331023%0.01
cacheD93633%0.03
infernoS75271%0.04
poseidon1010%-0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,030Matches
54%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
88.3ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
22Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient11550%1.1117.3
Mirage8648%1.1417.6
Nuke8260%1.2319.0
Anubis8152%1.1418.8
Dust25443%0.9716.2
Inferno4848%1.0517.2
Overpass2264%0.9115.1
Vertigo1844%1.0817.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.4%Headshot accuracy
40.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.1%Spray accuracy
80.1%Counter-strafing
7.3°Preaim
552msReaction time
27.8%T opening success
65.9%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
5.33HE damage / grenade
3.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.49 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.7669% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis19–160.0113%26 Aug
dust26–13-0.0820%26 Aug
ancient5–130.0128%26 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0015%25 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0218%25 Aug
dust22–13-0.0220%25 Aug
poseidon5–9-0.1120%25 Aug
dust213–80.0419%23 Aug
cache14–160.0230%23 Aug
mirage10–130.0333%23 Aug
anubis4–130.0748%23 Aug
ancient9–130.0225%22 Aug
anubis13–90.0318%22 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0228%22 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0037%22 Aug
inferno7–9-0.0615%20 Aug
dust213–10-0.0220%19 Aug
anubis13–50.0721%19 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0125%19 Aug
ancient9–130.0617%18 Aug
cache13–100.0838%18 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0127%18 Aug
ancient13–40.0322%18 Aug
inferno7–60.0240%17 Aug
anubis13–110.0526%17 Aug
dust27–130.0525%17 Aug
cache10–130.0127%17 Aug
mirage8–130.0627%16 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0321%16 Aug
dust213–110.0220%16 Aug
nuke13–90.0221%14 Aug
anubis11–130.0315%14 Aug
cache5–130.0527%14 Aug
ancient4–130.0323%14 Aug
dust213–30.0219%12 Aug
ancient7–13-0.035%12 Aug
anubis10–10.0524%12 Aug
nuke16–130.0425%12 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0221%10 Aug
anubis7–130.0424%10 Aug
mirage13–80.0343%10 Aug
mirage16–140.0231%9 Aug
mirage5–13-0.059%9 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0417%9 Aug
ancient13–40.0527%9 Aug
dust24–13-0.0025%9 Aug
inferno13–0-0.0211%9 Aug
nuke13–70.0516%9 Aug
anubis13–70.0317%8 Aug
cache10–130.0122%8 Aug
cache13–60.0622%8 Aug
mirage13–80.0732%8 Aug
cache7–130.0131%8 Aug
mirage4–130.1237%6 Aug
dust23–13-0.0126%6 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0611%6 Aug
anubis13–90.0519%6 Aug
nuke10–130.0511%6 Aug
anubis13–90.0221%6 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0020%6 Aug
nuke7–9-0.0322%6 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0523%4 Aug
inferno6–130.0635%4 Aug
nuke13–60.0331%4 Aug
cache13–8-0.0122%3 Aug
ancient16–140.0234%3 Aug
dust26–13-0.0026%3 Aug
anubis16–130.0620%3 Aug
ancient13–80.0130%2 Aug
ancient13–20.0830%2 Aug
anubis13–4-0.0627%2 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0535%2 Aug
anubis1–13-0.0218%2 Aug
nuke13–50.0161%2 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0017%2 Aug
cache11–13-0.0028%30 Jul
nuke13–70.0227%30 Jul
dust20–13-0.0255%30 Jul
ancient14–16-0.0122%30 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0627%29 Jul
ancient7–130.0424%29 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0115%29 Jul
ancient4–130.0026%29 Jul
nuke4–9-0.0453%29 Jul
inferno9–20.2048%29 Jul
inferno13–100.0550%27 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0129%27 Jul
inferno13–70.0234%27 Jul
anubis11–130.0424%27 Jul
nuke13–50.1128%26 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0122%26 Jul
anubis13–20.0218%26 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0134%26 Jul
dust213–90.0331%26 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0119%26 Jul
dust213–90.0831%26 Jul
nuke13–80.0631%25 Jul
mirage8–130.0532%25 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0232%25 Jul
ancient13–50.0222%25 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →