ruddi14

ruddi14 — CS2 Stats

DE76561198198596137[U:1:238330409]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,589Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating25,763Top 10% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#13344 of 225298 tracked
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 13 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,763 +3,366 13 Jul13 Sept · 33 days played
21,91527,161peak 27,16113 Jul13 Sept
27,161Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,130Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-07-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,130
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 370 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-08
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-08

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,398 below peak (27,161)
  • -1,306 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 4,237 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-08
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-08

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGruddi14PREMIER25,763 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,130csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92
Positioning66
Utility17

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50446Last 10050%Win rateWWLWLWWLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −3.4pp headshot accuracy · −21ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 503ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 495ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 505ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim9.2
Utility1.7
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels6.0
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2
Positioning6.6
Utility1.7
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels4.9
Win Impact2.6

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time502ms−52ms
first ⅓ avg 554ms → last ⅓ avg 502ms
Headshot accuracy30.3%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 30.1% → last ⅓ avg 30.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 9–2 · nuke, 13 Aug
66%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · nuke, 24 Jul
375msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · inferno, 5 Sept
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 6 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
75In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 12mirageWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2012860%0.00
infernoB137654%-0.01
ancientA138562%0.00
cacheB136746%0.01
anubisD124833%-0.01
nukeS128467%0.02
mirageD92722%-0.01
office2020%0.04
train21150%0.05
vertigo21150%-0.01
poseidon110100%-0.03
debris1010%-0.18

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,068Matches
52%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
84.6ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient13851%1.0816.9
Anubis11452%1.0417.0
Inferno9650%1.0816.8
Nuke6964%1.0816.4
Vertigo5751%1.3117.7
Overpass5161%1.2517.7
Dust24637%1.0116.0
Mirage3839%0.9115.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

30.2%Headshot accuracy
34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.8%Spray accuracy
88.1%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
500msReaction time
43.8%T opening success
55.1%CT opening success
0.27Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
10.31HE damage / grenade
0.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2714 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–50.0633%17 Sept
anubis13–30.0541%16 Sept
mirage10–130.0524%13 Sept
nuke13–5-0.0129%13 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0021%13 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0025%8 Sept
dust213–1-0.0137%6 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0521%5 Sept
office12–120.0123%5 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0636%3 Sept
office9–130.0746%3 Sept
dust213–50.1028%1 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0336%30 Aug
dust213–7-0.0233%30 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0424%30 Aug
mirage4–13-0.1213%30 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0242%28 Aug
inferno11–130.0128%28 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0940%28 Aug
cache9–130.0436%28 Aug
cache13–20.0126%27 Aug
cache11–13-0.0426%26 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0414%25 Aug
dust22–13-0.0538%25 Aug
inferno13–1-0.059%21 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0037%21 Aug
dust213–60.0636%21 Aug
dust26–13-0.0431%21 Aug
ancient9–130.0537%18 Aug
cache13–100.0127%18 Aug
inferno11–60.0326%18 Aug
inferno7–6-0.0148%17 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0328%17 Aug
dust27–13-0.0628%17 Aug
cache10–13-0.0135%17 Aug
cache7–130.0127%17 Aug
anubis1–13-0.0736%17 Aug
poseidon9–7-0.0332%13 Aug
nuke9–20.1432%13 Aug
inferno7–90.0543%13 Aug
cache13–6-0.0533%12 Aug
dust213–30.0229%12 Aug
train13–90.0835%12 Aug
train9–130.0328%12 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0121%10 Aug
mirage13–160.0234%8 Aug
cache1–2-0.0233%8 Aug
dust27–13-0.0633%8 Aug
nuke13–30.0048%8 Aug
dust213–20.0535%8 Aug
dust213–10-0.0542%7 Aug
dust20–13-0.080%7 Aug
cache5–20.0529%7 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0119%6 Aug
nuke10–130.0125%6 Aug
anubis13–90.0325%6 Aug
ancient13–110.0437%6 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0035%5 Aug
dust213–10.0749%5 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0030%5 Aug
dust213–100.0729%5 Aug
inferno13–80.0231%5 Aug
ancient13–100.0832%5 Aug
cache13–10-0.0026%3 Aug
ancient13–8-0.1018%2 Aug
ancient13–20.0754%2 Aug
nuke10–130.0228%2 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0253%31 Jul
cache16–140.0431%30 Jul
mirage10–130.0020%29 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0730%29 Jul
vertigo13–60.0532%29 Jul
vertigo10–13-0.0738%29 Jul
ancient13–90.0333%27 Jul
inferno13–90.0131%27 Jul
nuke13–60.0430%27 Jul
inferno2–13-0.1140%26 Jul
dust213–5-0.0121%26 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0216%26 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0027%25 Jul
mirage13–110.0921%25 Jul
dust213–80.0620%25 Jul
nuke4–130.0466%24 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0332%24 Jul
nuke13–90.0833%24 Jul
dust25–13-0.0733%24 Jul
anubis6–130.0134%24 Jul
anubis12–120.0133%22 Jul
anubis8–130.0233%21 Jul
debris1–9-0.1817%20 Jul
dust210–130.0228%20 Jul
mirage15–150.0234%19 Jul
cache15–150.0525%18 Jul
dust26–13-0.0129%18 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0419%17 Jul
inferno15–150.0124%17 Jul
dust213–90.0318%15 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0623%14 Jul
cache11–130.0230%13 Jul
ancient13–50.0542%13 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →