Massa

Massa — CS2 Stats

EE76561199164203575[U:1:1203937847]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,288Tracked matches43%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,429Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,543 -7,023 23 Jun – 27 Sept · 26 days played
12,54319,999peak 19,99923 Jun27 Sept
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2026-06-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning41
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42–54–4Last 10042%Win rateLWLWLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −1.5pp headshot accuracy · +28ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 667ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 657ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 643ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility5.4
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch4.4

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 670ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning4.1
Utility5.4
Mechanics9.2
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact2.6

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time664ms−23ms
first ⅓ avg 687ms → last ⅓ avg 664ms
Headshot accuracy25.4%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 23.7% → last ⅓ avg 25.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.07Best match rating · 13–8 · dust2, 14 Aug →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · ancient, 21 Jul →
500msFastest reaction time · 16–14 · nuke, 10 Jul →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 23 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
8–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 73% over 26anubisWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2619–773%-0.03
dust2D195–1426%-0.03
nukeC166–1038%-0.03
cacheD113–827%-0.03
anubisD92–722%-0.03
infernoA85–363%-0.05
ancientD82–625%-0.03
overpass—20–20%-0.04
vertigo—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

68,284Lifetime kills
1.06K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
3,903Matches
49.6%Match win rate · Top 25% of tracked players
51.9%Headshot % · Top 25% of tracked players
13.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
7,908MVPs
1,371Hours (in match)
3,665Bombs planted
653Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,851inferno
3,825nuke
3,302dust2
2,595vertigo
560train
369cbble
331office
298lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

39Matches
54%Win rate
0.70Avg K/D
61.8ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
5%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1136%0.6911.6
Nuke1070%0.7210.9
Overpass520%0.498.0
Dust2450%0.939.8
Anubis4100%0.6412.5
Ancient250%0.6610.5
Vertigo250%1.0215.0
Inferno1100%0.628.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.6%Headshot accuracy
31.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.2%Spray accuracy
91.4%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
670msReaction time
25.5%T opening success
50.2%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
9.78HE damage / grenade
11.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.5103% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–13-0.1022%28 Oct →
mirage8–5-0.0425%28 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.077%28 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0417%27 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0429%27 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0518%13 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.0638%19 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0541%19 Aug →
ancient13–16-0.0434%17 Aug →
mirage13–3-0.0310%17 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0035%17 Aug →
nuke2–13-0.0737%17 Aug →
mirage13–80.0027%17 Aug →
inferno13–4-0.0431%17 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0520%17 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0232%17 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0614%14 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.1110%14 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0622%14 Aug →
dust213–80.0728%14 Aug →
nuke8–130.0325%10 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0222%10 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0419%9 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0425%6 Aug →
anubis15–15-0.0533%6 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0135%5 Aug →
inferno13–3-0.018%3 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0322%30 Jul →
cache16–14-0.0629%30 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.0246%28 Jul →
dust27–130.0535%28 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0526%27 Jul →
nuke9–130.0218%25 Jul →
nuke13–70.0325%25 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0129%25 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0223%25 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0221%24 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.0233%24 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0018%24 Jul →
mirage13–30.0329%24 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0030%24 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0819%24 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0318%24 Jul →
mirage13–5-0.0022%24 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0428%23 Jul →
inferno13–1-0.0519%23 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0519%23 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.0523%22 Jul →
dust215–15-0.0429%22 Jul →
cache6–13-0.0424%21 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.0513%21 Jul →
ancient16–14-0.0314%21 Jul →
ancient2–13-0.0450%21 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0513%21 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0328%21 Jul →
mirage13–90.0028%19 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0222%19 Jul →
inferno13–9-0.0232%15 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0235%15 Jul →
mirage13–3-0.0123%15 Jul →
mirage13–70.0235%15 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0219%15 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0722%15 Jul →
ancient13–9-0.0113%12 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0917%12 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0124%12 Jul →
dust212–16-0.0619%12 Jul →
mirage13–70.0322%11 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0911%11 Jul →
mirage13–5-0.0130%11 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0626%11 Jul →
anubis13–20.0426%11 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0222%11 Jul →
cache4–13-0.1028%10 Jul →
nuke16–14-0.0715%10 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.0923%10 Jul →
cache16–130.0020%10 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0432%10 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0424%10 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.067%10 Jul →
cache12–12-0.0535%10 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0328%10 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0118%9 Jul →
dust213–90.0133%9 Jul →
anubis13–40.0420%9 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0433%9 Jul →
nuke5–13-0.0321%9 Jul →
mirage16–14-0.0821%9 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0822%9 Jul →
mirage13–5-0.0525%5 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0536%2 Jul →
overpass2–13-0.0623%2 Jul →
overpass1–13-0.0211%2 Jul →
nuke13–90.0026%2 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.0319%27 Jun →
mirage13–10-0.0229%27 Jun →
nuke13–4-0.0927%27 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0233%27 Jun →
nuke13–50.008%23 Jun →
vertigo3–13-0.0429%6 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.