Ilúvatar — CS2 Stats

US76561199159519951[U:1:1199254223]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,077Tracked matches41%Win rate2021Tracked since

3,655Hours in CS28Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating20,635Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#13015 of 35878 tracked

FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,146), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 8 median	Level 9 median	vs Level 9
Headshot rate	58.6%	47.2%	49.0%	above
Shot accuracy	14.3%	12.3%	13.1%	above
Kill/death ratio	0.95	1.07	1.08	0.13 short
Match win rate	50.8%	46.3%	46.9%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90

Positioning41

Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42–52–6Last 10042%Win rateWWLTLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.0

Aggression5.8

Utility5.2

Positioning4.1

Opening Duels2.0

Clutch0.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 49 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 592ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0

Positioning4.1

Utility5.2

Mechanics7.1

Opening Duels2.0

Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03

Reaction time595ms−86ms

first ⅓ avg 682ms → last ⅓ avg 595ms

Headshot accuracy28.4%−5.9%

first ⅓ avg 34.3% → last ⅓ avg 28.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — anubis 13–11

13–1Biggest win — cache

5Longest win streak

W2Current streak

7–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 70% over 10mirageWeakest map · 33% over 24

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	D	24	8–16	33%	-0.01
cache	C	22	8–14	36%	-0.02
dust2	B	22	11–11	50%	-0.03
inferno	S	10	7–3	70%	-0.01
nuke	D	9	3–6	33%	-0.03
ancient	C	8	3–5	38%	-0.05
anubis	—	4	2–2	50%	0.01
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

98,992Lifetime kills

0.95K/D

4,427Matches

50.8%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 8 players

58.6%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players

14.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players

13,856MVPs

3,122Hours (in match)

2,296Bombs planted

2,538Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4737,658

M4A4 / M4A1-S22,217

Desert Eagle9,666

P2000 / USP-S6,983

AWP6,875

Glock-183,427

Galil AR2,454

FAMAS2,441

Knife1,447

P2501,407

Lifetime map wins

12,958inferno

5,283dust2

3,193nuke

2,608vertigo

1,773train

227office

91cbble

48italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

813Matches

55%Win rate

1.07Avg K/D

76.5ADR

51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

21%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	32	56%	1.04	15.2
Inferno	17	47%	1.21	19.1
Ancient	15	40%	0.83	13.9
Dust2	9	22%	0.87	15.1
Vertigo	8	50%	0.81	14.0
Anubis	7	71%	0.83	12.7
Nuke	4	75%	1.10	18.8
Cache	3	67%	1.27	16.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.2%Headshot accuracy

37.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

42.8%Spray accuracy

81.8%Counter-strafing

8.6°Preaim

592msReaction time

34.0%T opening success

42.2%CT opening success

0.60Enemies flashed / flash

6.9%Flash assists

9.62HE damage / grenade

9.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 33.9733% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–10	-0.04	34%	29 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.01	41%	29 Aug →
nuke	14–16	-0.04	42%	29 Aug →
mirage	15–15	-0.04	20%	29 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.00	53%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.00	32%	25 Aug →
cache	12–16	-0.04	22%	25 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.01	25%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.03	31%	23 Aug →
nuke	2–13	-0.01	39%	23 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.01	49%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.06	31%	23 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.02	27%	23 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	31%	23 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.08	19%	19 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.03	23%	19 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	23%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.04	13%	17 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	35%	16 Aug →
ancient	2–13	-0.03	30%	15 Aug →
nuke	16–13	-0.02	30%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.03	39%	15 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.01	17%	15 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	16%	15 Aug →
inferno	9–1	-0.01	17%	15 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.06	24%	14 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.01	19%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.06	33%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	33%	9 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.05	28%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–7	-0.01	19%	6 Aug →
ancient	1–13	-0.11	20%	6 Aug →
nuke	1–13	-0.05	22%	6 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.01	22%	6 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	22%	6 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.01	26%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.03	29%	5 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.09	14%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	26%	4 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.01	23%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.07	22%	4 Aug →
nuke	12–12	0.01	24%	2 Aug →
cache	13–3	-0.02	22%	2 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.05	32%	30 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.08	27%	30 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.01	31%	30 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.03	33%	29 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.04	34%	15 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	23%	15 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.04	30%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–4	-0.02	29%	10 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	21%	8 Jul →
cache	13–1	0.02	39%	8 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.01	32%	8 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	50%	6 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.01	25%	6 Jul →
overpass	6–13	0.05	23%	6 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.06	16%	6 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	23%	5 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.02	15%	5 Jul →
cache	12–12	-0.03	23%	5 Jul →
ancient	3–13	-0.05	23%	3 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	38%	3 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.02	47%	3 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.05	25%	2 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	32%	2 Jul →
ancient	16–14	-0.02	23%	2 Jul →
inferno	4–6	-0.01	45%	13 Jun →
cache	12–12	-0.05	13%	13 Jun →
cache	9–13	-0.02	58%	13 Jun →
cache	9–13	-0.01	39%	8 Jun →
nuke	4–9	-0.19	23%	8 Jun →
inferno	9–2	0.04	44%	8 Jun →
cache	1–13	-0.01	35%	7 Jun →
dust2	13–10	-0.03	45%	7 Jun →
ancient	13–9	-0.02	15%	6 Jun →
mirage	16–12	0.02	26%	6 Jun →
inferno	13–3	-0.01	37%	6 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.00	36%	5 Jun →
anubis	11–13	-0.00	33%	5 Jun →
nuke	13–7	-0.01	17%	5 Jun →
ancient	5–13	-0.05	36%	4 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.01	33%	4 Jun →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	34%	3 Jun →
dust2	3–13	-0.07	29%	1 Jun →
cache	7–13	-0.07	41%	1 Jun →
dust2	13–6	0.01	57%	27 May →
ancient	13–8	-0.05	24%	27 May →
cache	12–12	0.01	22%	24 May →
cache	12–12	-0.03	30%	22 May →
mirage	7–13	-0.06	30%	22 May →
dust2	13–6	-0.01	33%	22 May →
mirage	2–3	-0.06	100%	20 May →
anubis	13–11	0.12	25%	20 May →
mirage	7–13	0.05	16%	19 May →
dust2	7–3	-0.02	20%	19 May →
cache	13–5	0.04	24%	19 May →
mirage	13–2	0.06	39%	19 May →
cache	11–13	-0.09	25%	16 May →
dust2	13–8	-0.02	47%	14 May →