Miko Yotsuya

Miko Yotsuya — CS2 Stats

76561199154133152[U:1:1193867424]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

893Tracked matches62%Win rate2023Tracked since
670Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#40092 of 225657 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 40 days played since 18 Oct 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,867 +5,175 18 Oct25 Aug · 16 days played
12,06422,867peak 22,86718 Oct25 Aug
22,867Peak Premier in tracked matches
40Days played since 2025-10-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=8,862), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate36.0%41.9%42.7%6.7% short
Shot accuracy0.3%12.2%11.2%10.9% short
Kill/death ratio0.980.981.000.02 short
Match win rate61.7%43.3%43.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMiko YotsuyaFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning48
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53443Last 10053%Win rateLLWLLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +0.4pp headshot accuracy · +77ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 669ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 644ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim5.4
Utility3.4
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.5

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 604ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning4.8
Utility3.4
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact9.0

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time602ms−58ms
first ⅓ avg 660ms → last ⅓ avg 602ms
Headshot accuracy12.1%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 11.7% → last ⅓ avg 12.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–8 · dust2, 9 Aug
27%Best headshot accuracy · 3–8 · nuke, 9 Aug
406msFastest reaction time · 5–1 · office, 17 Dec
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 2 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
L2Current streak
48In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 80% over 5officeWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS2014670%-0.01
ancientS1410471%-0.02
officeC135838%0.01
anubisA116555%-0.01
dust2C83538%-0.01
mirageC83538%-0.03
cacheA74357%-0.03
trainC52340%0.00
overpassS54180%-0.01
vertigo41325%0.02
nuke41325%-0.04
italy1010%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

13,307Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
1,024Matches
61.7%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 3 players
36.0%Headshot %
0.3%Shot accuracy
1,872MVPs
398Hours (in match)
1,350Bombs planted
355Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,598inferno
1,540dust2
823vertigo
793nuke
658office
299train
79italy
11cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

8Matches
25%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
ADR
29%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage333%1.0311.0
Vertigo333%1.0414.7
Inferno10%0.8012.0
Anubis10%1.0022.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.2%Headshot accuracy
32.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.8%Spray accuracy
79.4%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
604msReaction time
26.5%T opening success
47.0%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
9.03HE damage / grenade
2.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.1752% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3899 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.4856% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis2–13-0.0114%13 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0510%13 Sept
vertigo13–40.039%11 Sept
dust28–13-0.0319%9 Sept
office0–13-0.074%9 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0511%6 Sept
ancient13–10.0912%2 Sept
anubis13–40.0616%2 Sept
inferno13–20.0119%25 Aug
ancient13–11-0.038%25 Aug
anubis13–10-0.049%23 Aug
inferno13–8-0.049%23 Aug
ancient13–40.0112%18 Aug
cache13–90.039%18 Aug
inferno13–40.0213%18 Aug
cache13–7-0.007%17 Aug
anubis11–130.0116%17 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0113%17 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0612%17 Aug
dust213–9-0.0218%16 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0712%16 Aug
anubis13–9-0.076%16 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0317%16 Aug
anubis13–30.0113%16 Aug
mirage13–8-0.038%16 Aug
italy12–12-0.0015%16 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0314%16 Aug
cache13–10.0320%15 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0611%15 Aug
cache11–13-0.0711%15 Aug
ancient13–100.006%15 Aug
inferno13–30.0213%14 Aug
inferno13–60.0112%10 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0518%10 Aug
anubis13–60.0826%10 Aug
nuke3–8-0.1127%9 Aug
inferno3–130.0617%9 Aug
dust213–80.1213%9 Aug
cache7–13-0.0816%6 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0110%6 Aug
office11–130.0111%6 Aug
nuke10–130.0111%6 Aug
dust23–13-0.089%6 Aug
office7–130.0219%6 Aug
cache13–9-0.0912%1 Jun
cache10–13-0.0414%1 Jun
office13–10-0.0110%31 May
train4–13-0.0917%13 Feb
vertigo11–130.024%13 Feb
vertigo11–130.0213%11 Feb
train6–130.0123%28 Jan
mirage9–130.0214%28 Jan
office13–90.026%24 Jan
office13–80.0113%24 Jan
mirage2–13-0.057%18 Jan
overpass13–70.017%18 Jan
inferno13–3-0.0210%18 Jan
inferno10–130.0113%17 Jan
inferno13–30.0518%12 Jan
overpass13–7-0.037%12 Jan
office8–130.0712%7 Jan
inferno13–10-0.055%5 Jan
inferno13–40.0015%4 Jan
overpass13–8-0.0417%4 Jan
mirage14–16-0.0511%4 Jan
dust24–13-0.0520%4 Jan
mirage6–13-0.040%4 Jan
dust210–130.0222%4 Jan
office7–13-0.0210%4 Jan
overpass8–13-0.0110%2 Jan
mirage13–11-0.0411%2 Jan
ancient9–130.015%2 Jan
dust213–10-0.0216%2 Jan
office13–90.058%27 Dec
office3–130.014%27 Dec
office6–13-0.0217%25 Dec
train12–12-0.017%25 Dec
train13–10.034%25 Dec
vertigo9–130.017%20 Dec
ancient13–11-0.0214%20 Dec
train13–10.0717%20 Dec
nuke6–13-0.0814%18 Dec
office5–10.1013%17 Dec
office5–130.0113%17 Dec
anubis12–120.038%16 Dec
anubis6–13-0.0624%16 Dec
inferno13–5-0.0110%21 Nov
ancient13–8-0.0410%21 Nov
dust29–13-0.039%21 Nov
inferno13–60.019%16 Nov
ancient13–30.0016%16 Nov
nuke13–70.0313%16 Nov
overpass13–70.027%16 Nov
mirage13–11-0.0012%3 Nov
inferno13–9-0.0415%1 Nov
inferno13–5-0.0518%1 Nov
ancient13–6-0.088%24 Oct
inferno13–100.0214%24 Oct
ancient11–13-0.085%24 Oct
ancient11–13-0.0613%18 Oct

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →