Stompz — CS2 Stats

CN76561199153596438[U:1:1193330710]Steam profile ↗1 game ban

1,911Tracked matches55%Win rate2024Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.6 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating26,428Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#754 of 8083 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 1,285 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83

Positioning53

Utility32

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–45–3Last 10052%Win rateWLLLLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.3

Aggression4.9

Utility3.2

Positioning5.3

Opening Duels1.5

Clutch3.6

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.9° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 616ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3

Positioning5.3

Utility3.2

Mechanics9.3

Opening Duels1.9

Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time616ms+40ms

first ⅓ avg 575ms → last ⅓ avg 616ms

Headshot accuracy24.1%−2.6%

first ⅓ avg 26.6% → last ⅓ avg 24.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — ancient 13–6

13–1Biggest win — inferno

8Longest win streak

4–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 71% over 14anubisWeakest map · 33% over 15

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	26	12–14	46%	0.01
anubis	D	15	5–10	33%	0.02
dust2	S	14	10–4	71%	0.03
cache	C	13	5–8	38%	-0.00
ancient	B	13	7–6	54%	0.04
inferno	S	10	7–3	70%	0.03
nuke	S	9	6–3	67%	0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

769Matches

51%Win rate

1.19Avg K/D

80.0ADR

57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

27%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	253	48%	1.09	16.3
Ancient	141	56%	1.19	17.7
Anubis	112	59%	1.29	18.1
Nuke	81	48%	1.28	18.4
Dust2	54	33%	1.11	16.1
Inferno	47	53%	1.23	17.5
Cache	40	60%	1.32	18.2
Overpass	25	40%	1.18	17.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.2%Headshot accuracy

37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.8%Spray accuracy

91.9%Counter-strafing

10.9°Preaim

616msReaction time

26.6%T opening success

45.5%CT opening success

0.37Enemies flashed / flash

5.1%Flash assists

6.12HE damage / grenade

2.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3701 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 26.6085% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–9	0.03	38%	6 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.00	20%	5 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.06	12%	5 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.00	12%	5 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.01	17%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.11	37%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.01	23%	4 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	11%	4 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.00	20%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.03	30%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.02	29%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.03	39%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.02	26%	2 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.03	23%	2 Aug →
inferno	16–12	0.01	14%	2 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	38%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.01	33%	1 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.07	16%	1 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.02	20%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.15	20%	1 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.03	25%	1 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.00	38%	1 Aug →
anubis	3–13	-0.06	18%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.06	25%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.06	38%	1 Aug →
anubis	3–13	0.01	26%	31 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.01	23%	31 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.01	17%	31 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.01	16%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.04	27%	31 Jul →
anubis	13–4	0.09	19%	31 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.02	31%	31 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.04	16%	31 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.05	16%	31 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.01	36%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.07	22%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.08	50%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.15	34%	30 Jul →
mirage	12–16	-0.01	29%	30 Jul →
anubis	15–15	0.06	25%	30 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.02	11%	30 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.07	30%	29 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.02	19%	29 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.05	36%	29 Jul →
anubis	2–12	-0.02	23%	29 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.03	20%	29 Jul →
nuke	5–13	0.03	22%	28 Jul →
ancient	7–13	0.00	26%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.07	31%	28 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.01	12%	28 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.10	14%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.00	17%	28 Jul →
inferno	14–16	0.02	34%	28 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.06	26%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–4	-0.02	29%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	23%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.03	38%	27 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.02	16%	27 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.05	24%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.04	33%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.06	33%	27 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.00	14%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.09	31%	27 Jul →
anubis	10–13	0.01	30%	27 Jul →
cache	14–16	-0.02	25%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.04	10%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.04	32%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.08	32%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.06	28%	27 Jul →
dust2	14–16	0.04	27%	27 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.00	23%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	11%	26 Jul →
ancient	9–13	0.09	34%	26 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	26%	26 Jul →
cache	16–13	0.02	27%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.08	25%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–16	0.11	32%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.05	22%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.04	24%	26 Jul →
mirage	2–7	-0.00	44%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.08	25%	26 Jul →
dust2	16–12	0.06	36%	26 Jul →
cache	10–3	0.09	38%	26 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.03	20%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–1	0.03	23%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.01	21%	26 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.01	22%	26 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.09	33%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.01	21%	26 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	23%	26 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.02	23%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	20%	25 Jul →
nuke	13–3	-0.00	31%	25 Jul →
anubis	13–16	0.03	35%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.00	28%	25 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	35%	25 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.02	28%	25 Jul →
dust2	16–13	0.06	23%	25 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	21%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.04	19%	25 Jul →

Show all 100 matchesShow fewer

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

Explore CSDB.gg

Sensitivity ConverterConvert sensitivity between CS2 and other games eDPI CalculatorCalculate your effective DPI cm/360 CalculatorMouse distance per full turn Resolution CalculatorCompare aspect ratios and resolutions Crosshair GeneratorBuild and preview custom crosshairs

Tools

Sticker Craft MakerPlan and price a CS2 sticker craft with live prices on every piece CS2 Stats TrackerLook up any player: Premier rating, Faceit level, matches and skill breakdown Trust Factor CheckerEstimate your CS2 Trust Factor from the signals Valve has acknowledged

Learn & Explore

Most Traded CS2 SkinsRanked by completed sales — transaction data, not listings Cheapest Knives in CS2Every knife type ranked by its cheapest live price Cheapest Gloves in CS2Every glove model ranked by its cheapest live price