earl of phantomhive

earl of phantomhive — CS2 Stats

KP76561199134295789[U:1:1174030061]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

392Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating23,134Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4299 of 16589 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,497 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGearl of phantomhiveFACEITLevel 7 · 1,497 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER23,134 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning63
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55405Last 10055%Win rateLWWTWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4
Aggression8.5
Utility5.5
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch5.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 614ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning6.3
Utility5.5
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time613ms−38ms
first ⅓ avg 652ms → last ⅓ avg 613ms
Headshot accuracy25.5%−4.0%
first ⅓ avg 29.5% → last ⅓ avg 25.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — ancient 13–4
131Biggest win — train
5Longest win streak
53In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 12anubisWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB22111150%0.02
ancientA159660%0.02
nukeB137654%-0.00
infernoS128467%-0.00
dust2B126650%0.03
anubisC114736%0.01
cacheS64267%0.02
overpass43175%0.04
office220100%0.01
train21150%0.02
vertigo1010%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

91Matches
57%Win rate
1.31Avg K/D
89.4ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

48%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3751%1.2718.0
Inferno1553%1.3819.6
Dust21242%1.0814.5
Ancient1070%1.3618.0
Anubis560%1.9920.8
Overpass5100%1.5321.2
Vertigo450%1.0314.0
Nuke2100%1.2817.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.4%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.9%Spray accuracy
81.9%Counter-strafing
12.7°Preaim
614msReaction time
40.2%T opening success
51.0%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
10.1%Flash assists
6.03HE damage / grenade
10.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.6798° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis9–130.1415%25 Aug
nuke13–30.0730%25 Aug
office13–100.0233%25 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0120%13 Aug
mirage13–40.0837%8 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0222%8 Aug
anubis10–130.0225%8 Aug
dust24–13-0.0128%8 Aug
ancient13–80.0730%8 Aug
cache13–90.0115%8 Aug
cache13–60.0119%3 Aug
mirage12–160.0217%3 Aug
ancient13–60.0238%16 Jul
dust213–160.0423%16 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0727%15 Jul
cache5–130.0137%15 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0627%15 Jul
vertigo6–130.0523%15 Jul
train13–10.0334%15 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0122%11 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0131%11 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0322%11 Jul
mirage5–130.0718%11 Jul
cache13–60.0623%11 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0314%11 Jul
dust29–130.1132%11 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0512%11 Jul
ancient13–70.1313%11 Jul
dust213–110.0140%6 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0318%6 Jul
dust28–13-0.0150%6 Jul
anubis10–130.0024%6 Jul
mirage16–130.0322%6 Jul
nuke13–30.0329%6 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0634%6 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0326%6 Jul
mirage13–50.0119%6 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0026%6 Jul
inferno13–16-0.0030%5 Jul
ancient13–70.0132%5 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0732%5 Jul
mirage13–40.0216%5 Jul
ancient6–130.0322%5 Jul
overpass13–90.0518%4 Jul
anubis13–40.0021%4 Jul
mirage16–140.0424%4 Jul
overpass7–130.0022%4 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0111%4 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0218%4 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0131%4 Jul
anubis13–90.0825%4 Jul
dust213–70.0239%4 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0118%2 Jul
inferno1–13-0.0143%2 Jul
anubis11–130.0327%25 Jun
dust213–100.0310%25 Jun
dust213–40.1132%24 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0219%24 Jun
mirage13–50.0624%24 Jun
dust24–13-0.0229%24 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0028%24 Jun
inferno13–30.0821%23 Jun
dust213–110.0325%23 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0218%23 Jun
overpass13–100.0423%23 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0126%23 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0130%23 Jun
mirage12–16-0.0618%22 Jun
mirage15–150.0824%21 Jun
train7–130.0135%21 Jun
mirage13–90.0526%21 Jun
dust213–70.0227%21 Jun
nuke13–70.0335%21 Jun
ancient13–50.0633%20 Jun
nuke9–130.0228%20 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0224%20 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0745%20 Jun
dust210–130.0029%20 Jun
nuke13–8-0.0138%20 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0112%19 Jun
mirage12–120.1027%19 Jun
inferno13–5-0.0526%18 Jun
anubis8–130.0334%18 Jun
inferno13–100.0221%18 Jun
overpass13–60.0625%18 Jun
mirage13–40.0041%18 Jun
mirage14–160.0533%18 Jun
mirage11–130.0123%17 Jun
nuke8–130.0530%8 Jun
ancient13–40.2134%5 Jun
mirage13–3-0.0167%25 May
mirage6–130.0026%30 Apr
cache12–12-0.0021%30 Apr
cache13–40.0343%30 Apr
nuke3–13-0.068%21 Apr
nuke13–90.0135%12 Apr
office13–10-0.0021%18 Mar
inferno13–60.1131%18 Mar
nuke13–2-0.0226%18 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0127%8 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →