Dzikowaty

Dzikowaty — CS2 Stats

PL76561199132240753[U:1:1171975025]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,003Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
10,069Hours in CS12Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,850Top 50% of 200,982 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#55235 of 247923 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,414 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,850 +4,033 29 Jul – 30 Sept · 27 days played
16,89922,475peak 22,47529 Jul30 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,414 +0 31 Aug – 3 Sept · 2 observations
1,4141,414peak 1,41431 Aug3 Sept
22,603Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,414Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-07-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,414
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 117 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 625 below peak (22,475)
  • +1,850 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,150 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches59——
Win rate51%——
K/D1.81——
Headshot %51%——

Measured 1 Sep 2026 → 2 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,327), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate44.9%48.2%50.9%6.1% short
Shot accuracy7.3%13.3%13.8%6.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.261.071.09above
Match win rate47.2%46.9%48.4%1.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDzikowatyFACEITLevel 9 · 1,414 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER21,850 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,414csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning56
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–50–1Last 10049%Win rateLLWLWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · +1.6pp headshot accuracy · −13ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 638ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 609ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility5.3
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 596ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.6
Utility5.3
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time589ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 631ms → last ⅓ avg 589ms
Headshot accuracy25.1%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 25.0% → last ⅓ avg 25.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 31 Jul →
57%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · inferno, 22 Aug →
438msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · inferno, 17 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 2 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
L2Current streak
4–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 64% over 11ancientWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2012–860%0.05
infernoA1810–856%0.03
ancientD133–1023%0.04
anubisD124–833%0.02
nukeB115–645%0.02
cacheA117–464%0.02
dust2A117–464%0.03
train—21–150%-0.01
overpass—10–10%-0.05
office—10–10%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

311,004Lifetime kills
1.26K/D · Top 25% of Level 9 players
12,479Matches
47.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
44.9%Headshot %
7.3%Shot accuracy
32,260MVPs
6,119Hours (in match)
7,425Bombs planted
4,326Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP74,020
AK-4773,603
Knife12,518
Glock-1810,417
P2507,746
MAC-105,117

Lifetime map wins

14,448nuke
10,297dust2
8,411inferno
4,942vertigo
2,795cbble
1,560office
1,340train
660lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

738Matches
50%Win rate
1.20Avg K/D
79.8ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage27650%1.2317.1
Anubis13954%1.3519.3
Dust29441%1.0615.6
Nuke6656%1.2917.8
Ancient5650%1.1316.5
Inferno4951%1.0615.2
Cache1765%1.2819.0
Vertigo1638%1.0415.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.8%Headshot accuracy
34.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.6%Spray accuracy
81.3%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
596msReaction time
32.1%T opening success
43.5%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
7.3%Flash assists
11.80HE damage / grenade
5.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.0605% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage4–130.1114%1 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0019%30 Sept →
cache13–90.0625%30 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.0230%30 Sept →
mirage13–20.0320%29 Sept →
mirage13–70.1119%27 Sept →
cache13–90.0438%27 Sept →
mirage13–60.0325%25 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0124%25 Sept →
mirage8–130.0732%25 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0421%25 Sept →
overpass3–9-0.0526%16 Sept →
inferno5–9-0.083%16 Sept →
mirage13–80.0327%16 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0423%12 Sept →
ancient7–130.0214%11 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0319%11 Sept →
nuke13–40.0528%9 Sept →
cache13–30.0833%9 Sept →
cache7–130.0238%9 Sept →
inferno13–20.0524%8 Sept →
mirage13–90.0628%6 Sept →
dust211–130.0022%5 Sept →
mirage6–130.0527%5 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0229%5 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0427%4 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0115%4 Sept →
nuke13–60.0333%3 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0130%3 Sept →
dust213–10.0427%2 Sept →
inferno7–0-0.0032%2 Sept →
dust213–50.0532%2 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.0125%2 Sept →
dust213–60.0820%2 Sept →
inferno13–60.0317%2 Sept →
anubis11–130.0818%31 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0213%31 Aug →
ancient11–130.1227%31 Aug →
anubis13–70.0126%29 Aug →
inferno13–6-0.0148%28 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0321%26 Aug →
inferno15–150.0428%26 Aug →
cache13–80.0521%25 Aug →
anubis13–40.0916%25 Aug →
mirage13–60.0521%25 Aug →
cache13–60.0321%23 Aug →
ancient9–130.0317%23 Aug →
inferno5–130.0557%22 Aug →
cache11–130.0415%21 Aug →
inferno13–110.1423%21 Aug →
ancient16–140.0632%21 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0226%21 Aug →
ancient13–100.0638%21 Aug →
inferno13–60.0524%21 Aug →
dust213–50.0632%21 Aug →
mirage13–50.0922%21 Aug →
inferno13–50.1526%17 Aug →
train13–7-0.0419%14 Aug →
mirage8–130.0014%14 Aug →
nuke13–90.1133%14 Aug →
inferno11–130.0133%12 Aug →
ancient10–130.0233%12 Aug →
inferno13–50.1344%12 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0320%10 Aug →
ancient13–30.1320%10 Aug →
mirage13–90.0518%9 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0827%9 Aug →
train11–130.0231%8 Aug →
dust29–130.0224%8 Aug →
inferno9–70.0718%8 Aug →
inferno13–100.0226%8 Aug →
ancient9–130.0736%8 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0319%8 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0019%7 Aug →
anubis13–50.0524%7 Aug →
mirage3–130.0727%7 Aug →
ancient7–130.0118%6 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0229%6 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0123%6 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0727%6 Aug →
mirage8–130.0430%5 Aug →
dust216–120.0144%5 Aug →
ancient0–13-0.0419%4 Aug →
nuke13–40.0820%3 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0426%3 Aug →
anubis9–130.0537%3 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0516%3 Aug →
mirage8–130.0419%2 Aug →
dust213–80.0222%2 Aug →
mirage13–50.1216%1 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0023%1 Aug →
ancient11–130.0322%31 Jul →
mirage16–140.0422%31 Jul →
dust213–40.1527%31 Jul →
ancient11–130.0926%30 Jul →
anubis2–13-0.0215%30 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.0225%30 Jul →
anubis16–120.0537%30 Jul →
office6–130.0126%30 Jul →
nuke3–13-0.0231%29 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.