makado

makado — CS2 Stats

US76561199122651562[U:1:1162385834]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

652Tracked matches38%Win rate2023Tracked since
812Hours in CS20Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating16,643Purple band · top ~21.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,716 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,643 +91 7 Jun – 30 Sept · 23 days played
16,55219,568peak 19,5687 Jun30 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,716 +0 29 Aug – 14 Sept · 3 observations
1,7161,716peak 1,71629 Aug14 Sept
19,667Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,716Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-06-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,716
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 35 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,925 below peak (19,568)
  • -1,772 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,357 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches60——
Win rate48%——
K/D1.15——
Headshot %45%——

Measured 3 Sep 2026 → 3 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,885), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate48.7%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy2.5%12.7%13.0%10.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.171.051.06above
Match win rate51.2%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmakadoFACEITLevel 7 · 1,716 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER16,643 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,716csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning67
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–47–6Last 10047%Win rateLLWLLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +2.7pp headshot accuracy · −41ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 576ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 596ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility4.6
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong T-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 72% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 72% on T to 41% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 577ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning6.7
Utility4.6
Mechanics8.9
Opening Duels6.3
Win Impact1.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time573ms−63ms
first ⅓ avg 636ms → last ⅓ avg 573ms
Headshot accuracy19.3%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 20.2% → last ⅓ avg 19.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–2 · nuke, 11 Jul →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · dust2, 5 Sept →
438msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · ancient, 12 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 10 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
11–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 11cacheWeakest map · 40% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2912–1741%0.02
mirageB2211–1150%0.01
cacheC156–940%0.00
anubisC125–742%-0.00
ancientA117–464%0.01
infernoC73–443%-0.01
nuke—43–175%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

13,441Lifetime kills
1.17K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
820Matches
51.2%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 7 players
48.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players
2.5%Shot accuracy
1,806MVPs
346Hours (in match)
1,016Bombs planted
279Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,823dust2
768inferno
421nuke
56train
45vertigo
8office
1italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

271Matches
50%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
74.4ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust29154%1.2016.3
Mirage8342%1.1516.4
Ancient4749%1.0116.1
Inferno2055%1.0313.4
Anubis1267%1.3816.8
Nuke1155%1.0114.2
Cache450%1.0015.5
Train2100%1.4228.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy
40.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.3%Spray accuracy
89.9%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
577msReaction time
72.1%T opening success
40.6%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
10.27HE damage / grenade
4.71Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4893 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–13-0.0115%3 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0315%30 Sept →
mirage13–110.0128%26 Sept →
cache9–130.0319%26 Sept →
dust214–160.0128%26 Sept →
nuke13–60.0125%26 Sept →
ancient6–130.0211%23 Sept →
anubis5–130.0529%23 Sept →
nuke13–70.0222%22 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0614%21 Sept →
cache8–13-0.028%19 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0114%19 Sept →
dust211–130.0114%19 Sept →
anubis11–130.0725%18 Sept →
cache16–140.0318%18 Sept →
ancient13–90.0417%18 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0513%17 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0019%17 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0333%16 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0518%16 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0218%13 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0618%13 Sept →
ancient13–20.0010%12 Sept →
dust211–130.0229%12 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0120%12 Sept →
dust216–140.0519%12 Sept →
dust213–10.0622%10 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0420%10 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0018%10 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0312%6 Sept →
anubis13–70.0923%5 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0014%5 Sept →
mirage16–140.1032%5 Sept →
dust210–130.1033%5 Sept →
anubis10–130.0420%5 Sept →
dust25–130.0240%5 Sept →
inferno13–110.0227%5 Sept →
dust213–2-0.0027%5 Sept →
mirage8–130.0236%5 Sept →
cache16–120.0728%5 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0121%4 Sept →
cache13–110.0329%4 Sept →
mirage13–20.0216%4 Sept →
dust25–130.0218%4 Sept →
mirage13–50.0118%4 Sept →
mirage13–60.0223%4 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0413%4 Sept →
dust213–160.0117%3 Sept →
ancient16–12-0.0117%3 Sept →
cache13–110.1017%3 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0328%3 Sept →
dust213–80.0216%2 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0614%2 Sept →
dust213–60.0819%30 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0522%29 Aug →
dust213–60.1115%29 Aug →
cache15–150.0231%29 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0220%29 Aug →
dust24–70.0613%26 Aug →
dust213–80.0328%26 Aug →
dust213–100.0821%24 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0937%24 Aug →
cache14–160.0035%23 Aug →
anubis13–80.008%23 Aug →
ancient10–130.126%23 Aug →
mirage13–100.0433%23 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0835%23 Aug →
inferno13–90.0320%22 Aug →
cache15–150.0519%22 Aug →
mirage7–130.0728%22 Aug →
mirage13–70.0815%22 Aug →
dust213–50.0528%22 Aug →
cache11–130.0332%22 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0121%22 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0020%22 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0520%22 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0115%22 Aug →
dust215–150.0037%15 Aug →
mirage10–130.0717%15 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0328%15 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0621%8 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0115%8 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0514%8 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0112%19 Jul →
mirage13–110.0024%19 Jul →
ancient16–130.0022%19 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0315%11 Jul →
nuke13–20.1630%11 Jul →
dust210–13-0.026%11 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.0215%11 Jul →
cache5–13-0.107%11 Jul →
mirage13–100.0426%14 Jun →
anubis13–7-0.0022%14 Jun →
ancient15–15-0.0410%14 Jun →
dust213–10.1229%14 Jun →
anubis13–5-0.0824%14 Jun →
inferno15–150.0019%7 Jun →
inferno13–6-0.0313%7 Jun →
dust213–160.0331%7 Jun →
mirage4–13-0.0614%7 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.