Bro2pro

Bro2pro — CS2 Stats

CA76561199122399259[U:1:1162133531]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,777Tracked matches79%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.7 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating29,999Top 1% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~0.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#539 of 227341 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,635 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 30 days played since 31 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 29,999 +2,272 31 Jul15 Sept · 26 days played
25,56229,999peak 29,99931 Jul15 Sept
29,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,635Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-07-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,635
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 365 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 29,999
  • +2,674 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 1 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBro2proFACEITLevel 10 · 2,635 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER29,999 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,635csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning72
Utility24

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57403Last 10057%Win rateWWWWLWWLTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +2.8pp headshot accuracy · −23ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 480ms

Last 10

  • 721 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 525ms

Last 20

  • 1541 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility2.4
Positioning7.2
Opening Duels5.9
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 73% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 73% on T to 48% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning7.2
Utility2.4
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels7.2
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.7/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time524ms−43ms
first ⅓ avg 567ms → last ⅓ avg 524ms
Headshot accuracy26.5%−2.7%
first ⅓ avg 29.2% → last ⅓ avg 26.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.27Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 2 Aug
71%Best headshot accuracy · 9–1 · inferno, 2 Aug
313msFastest reaction time · 0–4 · ancient, 7 Aug
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 11 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
W4Current streak
811In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 68% over 22nukeWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS29191066%0.02
dust2S2215768%0.00
ancientC156940%0.01
infernoB157847%0.03
cacheS64267%-0.01
nukeD61517%-0.04
anubisA53260%0.02
office110100%0.07
vertigo110100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,583Matches
51%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
82.5ADR
58%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage50151%1.1517.6
Ancient29251%1.1817.9
Dust221248%1.1316.4
Vertigo18154%1.1917.7
Anubis14058%1.1617.1
Inferno13748%1.0916.6
Nuke5553%1.2318.4
Overpass4040%1.0016.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.7%Headshot accuracy
39.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.3%Spray accuracy
85.1%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
520msReaction time
72.9%T opening success
47.7%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
4.56HE damage / grenade
1.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 1.852 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient16–14-0.0420%18 Sept
anubis13–50.0526%16 Sept
mirage13–50.0220%15 Sept
mirage13–10.0430%15 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0113%15 Sept
inferno13–20.0559%15 Sept
mirage13–20.0229%15 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0331%15 Sept
mirage15–150.0719%15 Sept
dust213–90.0326%15 Sept
mirage13–60.0218%15 Sept
inferno7–130.0121%15 Sept
dust25–13-0.0626%15 Sept
ancient13–7-0.0222%15 Sept
office13–80.0713%15 Sept
vertigo13–90.0038%15 Sept
mirage13–90.0328%14 Sept
mirage13–60.0631%14 Sept
mirage7–10.0623%14 Sept
cache13–70.0024%14 Sept
dust213–11-0.0124%14 Sept
dust213–10-0.0315%14 Sept
ancient6–130.0240%14 Sept
dust213–70.0536%14 Sept
mirage13–110.0034%14 Sept
dust29–13-0.0330%13 Sept
mirage13–60.0516%13 Sept
dust213–11-0.0214%12 Sept
ancient13–90.0733%12 Sept
mirage13–70.0927%12 Sept
ancient10–130.0927%11 Sept
dust213–00.0539%11 Sept
mirage11–130.0325%10 Sept
dust213–8-0.0127%9 Sept
dust213–40.0429%9 Sept
dust213–8-0.0427%9 Sept
dust23–13-0.0122%7 Sept
cache13–8-0.0118%6 Sept
dust213–110.0128%6 Sept
ancient13–90.0720%6 Sept
dust213–11-0.0135%6 Sept
dust213–80.1426%6 Sept
dust210–130.0538%5 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0323%5 Sept
anubis13–60.0138%5 Sept
nuke7–90.0418%2 Sept
nuke9–30.1317%2 Sept
inferno7–9-0.0839%2 Sept
inferno9–30.1123%2 Sept
mirage13–16-0.0019%31 Aug
dust213–4-0.0124%31 Aug
inferno4–9-0.0522%30 Aug
inferno8–80.0631%30 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0424%29 Aug
anubis14–160.0424%29 Aug
ancient10–130.0220%27 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0129%25 Aug
ancient13–70.0432%25 Aug
inferno11–130.0633%25 Aug
mirage13–20.0733%25 Aug
dust22–5-0.100%25 Aug
nuke7–9-0.0212%25 Aug
inferno9–50.0834%25 Aug
mirage11–130.0122%24 Aug
cache13–11-0.0038%20 Aug
ancient1–13-0.0222%20 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0843%18 Aug
mirage0–6-0.0429%18 Aug
mirage6–130.0526%17 Aug
mirage13–80.0329%17 Aug
dust210–13-0.0423%17 Aug
dust213–40.0536%15 Aug
mirage13–70.0440%15 Aug
mirage16–130.0434%14 Aug
ancient0–7-0.080%14 Aug
anubis13–110.0222%14 Aug
dust24–13-0.0117%14 Aug
inferno11–130.0436%14 Aug
ancient11–130.0522%14 Aug
ancient13–80.0224%14 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0339%10 Aug
nuke6–9-0.0226%10 Aug
ancient0–4-0.0725%7 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0225%3 Aug
dust213–6-0.0228%3 Aug
nuke7–9-0.1518%2 Aug
nuke0–9-0.2312%2 Aug
inferno9–60.0738%2 Aug
inferno9–50.0040%2 Aug
inferno9–10.2757%2 Aug
inferno9–10.0771%2 Aug
inferno4–9-0.1731%2 Aug
mirage13–60.0824%1 Aug
cache12–16-0.0123%1 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0919%1 Aug
ancient1–20.0650%1 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0226%1 Aug
cache2–13-0.0420%1 Aug
mirage15–150.0326%31 Jul
cache13–6-0.0127%31 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →