Frozze

Frozze — CS2 Stats

76561199110258543[U:1:1149992815]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,740Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,234Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 56 days played since 24 Nov 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,111 +498 11 Dec26 Feb · 12 days played
23,58426,205peak 26,20511 Dec26 Feb
26,205Peak Premier in tracked matches
56Days played since 2025-11-24

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning59
Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50455Last 10050%Win rateWLLWLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −0.0pp headshot accuracy · −36ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility7.2
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch4.4

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.75 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 594ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.9
Utility7.2
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time591ms+12ms
first ⅓ avg 579ms → last ⅓ avg 591ms
Headshot accuracy23.6%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 25.4% → last ⅓ avg 23.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–3 · ancient, 10 May
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–3 · mirage, 2 Jan
375msFastest reaction time · 0–6 · dust2, 19 Jan
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 4 Feb

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
107In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB45212447%0.02
dust2A2214864%0.01
anubisD124833%0.02
ancientS86275%0.05
overpassS54180%0.03
vertigo31233%0.06
inferno2020%-0.04
nuke2020%-0.00
train1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

123,017Lifetime kills
1.23K/D · Top 25% of tracked players
4,286Matches
48.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of tracked players
48.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
12.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
14,115MVPs
2,234Hours (in match)
4,827Bombs planted
1,698Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4742,714
AWP12,681
Knife3,162
FAMAS1,990
MAC-101,698

Lifetime map wins

6,374dust2
6,129vertigo
4,939inferno
2,271nuke
1,873train
186office
168safehouse
112dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,391Matches
52%Win rate
1.20Avg K/D
82.6ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage45255%1.2616.8
Dust220457%1.2016.3
Ancient13146%1.1716.9
Anubis10544%1.2016.2
Vertigo8357%1.2017.3
Inferno3741%1.0516.6
Nuke3746%1.0115.2
Overpass2934%1.1516.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.9%Headshot accuracy
37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.8%Spray accuracy
77.2%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
594msReaction time
29.4%T opening success
58.0%CT opening success
0.75Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
13.78HE damage / grenade
10.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.3739% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–100.0435%15 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0531%13 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0725%11 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0226%25 Jul
mirage6–130.0725%5 Jul
ancient8–130.0521%3 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0827%27 May
ancient13–100.0528%26 May
ancient13–30.1826%10 May
overpass13–11-0.0213%10 May
mirage13–60.0628%6 May
dust22–13-0.0539%5 May
mirage13–40.0723%4 May
mirage8–130.0933%4 May
mirage10–13-0.0120%27 Apr
ancient13–70.0225%24 Apr
dust214–16-0.0715%16 Apr
dust213–110.0337%4 Apr
anubis10–130.0518%1 Apr
anubis10–130.0119%31 Mar
dust213–40.0518%29 Mar
mirage13–80.0221%29 Mar
overpass13–50.0118%28 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0415%28 Mar
mirage13–40.0121%23 Mar
mirage11–13-0.044%23 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0533%18 Mar
mirage13–70.0725%15 Mar
anubis17–19-0.0217%12 Mar
mirage13–80.0911%12 Mar
mirage13–100.0224%12 Mar
mirage12–12-0.0121%12 Mar
dust213–90.0331%8 Mar
mirage13–60.0927%5 Mar
dust213–110.0519%1 Mar
dust216–120.0535%26 Feb
inferno5–13-0.0317%26 Feb
anubis6–130.0325%25 Feb
mirage7–130.0527%25 Feb
mirage11–130.0326%20 Feb
dust213–110.0718%18 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0318%18 Feb
anubis13–11-0.0129%17 Feb
mirage13–60.0223%11 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0220%11 Feb
dust24–13-0.0342%11 Feb
dust213–40.0727%7 Feb
dust213–60.0722%7 Feb
anubis8–130.0624%7 Feb
dust213–90.0418%4 Feb
mirage13–10.1028%4 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0313%4 Feb
mirage7–13-0.0322%4 Feb
dust213–11-0.0112%31 Jan
nuke7–130.0124%31 Jan
mirage13–110.0128%31 Jan
anubis13–90.0721%30 Jan
mirage13–10-0.0228%30 Jan
mirage7–130.0311%30 Jan
mirage15–150.0217%29 Jan
mirage11–130.0428%29 Jan
mirage9–130.0032%25 Jan
dust26–13-0.0540%25 Jan
dust213–50.0030%24 Jan
dust24–70.0327%24 Jan
dust213–60.0037%23 Jan
dust23–13-0.0326%23 Jan
mirage13–6-0.0244%23 Jan
mirage13–90.1425%22 Jan
ancient13–40.0622%22 Jan
anubis13–80.1123%22 Jan
mirage13–20.0739%21 Jan
dust216–120.1025%19 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0317%19 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0318%19 Jan
ancient10–13-0.0121%19 Jan
dust211–130.0121%19 Jan
dust20–6-0.1017%19 Jan
mirage2–13-0.0813%19 Jan
nuke6–13-0.0241%19 Jan
vertigo9–70.1444%14 Jan
overpass11–130.0117%14 Jan
overpass13–90.0723%14 Jan
anubis8–130.0417%13 Jan
mirage12–12-0.0321%11 Jan
dust213–50.0631%11 Jan
mirage6–130.0036%11 Jan
mirage13–30.0531%7 Jan
mirage12–120.0720%4 Jan
mirage13–10-0.0021%2 Jan
mirage13–10.0825%2 Jan
mirage0–3-0.02100%2 Jan
anubis13–40.0123%25 Dec
vertigo6–130.0615%17 Dec
vertigo12–12-0.0122%17 Dec
ancient13–100.0113%14 Dec
train5–130.0212%14 Dec
mirage16–120.0414%11 Dec
mirage8–13-0.0410%4 Dec
overpass13–110.1017%24 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →