Emi⋆˚𝜗𝜚˚⋆ — CS2 Stats

FI76561199098757932[U:1:1138492204]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

347Tracked matches41%Win rate2026Tracked since

CSDB Rating3.2 LearningPositional Player

Premier CS Rating2,714Grey band · top ~88.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#208485 of 259996 tracked

WingmanSilver Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 2,714 -833 9 Oct – 4 Nov · 15 days played

4,233Peak Premier in tracked matches

19Days played since 2026-10-08

Premier CS Rating

1,225 below peak (3,939)
-833 over 30 days · declining
Next: Light Blue band at 5,000 — 2,286 to go

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim43

Positioning54

Utility24

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47–47–6Last 10047%Win rateTWTWTLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +5.5pp headshot accuracy · −39ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

2–0–3 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 20%
Avg reaction 534ms

Last 10

3–4–3 · 30% win rate
Avg rating -0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 16%
Avg reaction 560ms

Last 20

6–11–3 · 30% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 14%
Avg reaction 579ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+3.3 against its own average).

Aim4.3

Utility2.4

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels0.8

Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like iM 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 64% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.3

Positioning5.4

Utility2.4

Mechanics3.1

Opening Duels2.1

Win Impact1.9

Composite 3.2/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time583ms−28ms

first ⅓ avg 611ms → last ⅓ avg 583ms

Headshot accuracy12.5%+1.0%

first ⅓ avg 11.5% → last ⅓ avg 12.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.34Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 14 Oct →

57%Best headshot accuracy · 9–5 · nuke, 14 Oct →

406msFastest reaction time · 9–4 · inferno, 14 Oct →

13–0Biggest win · nuke, 3 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak

3–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

4Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 61% over 23anubisWeakest map · 40% over 20

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	A	23	14–9	61%	-0.01
anubis	C	20	8–12	40%	-0.02
mirage	C	19	8–11	42%	-0.02
inferno	B	15	7–8	47%	-0.00
dust2	B	11	5–6	45%	-0.03
ancient	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.03
cache	—	4	2–2	50%	0.01
italy	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

7Matches

29%Win rate

0.65Avg K/D

60.0ADR

47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win

50%1v2 clutch win

1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	3	0%	0.50	8.3
Mirage	1	100%	0.57	16.0
Nuke	1	0%	1.11	21.0
Inferno	1	0%	0.85	17.0
Anubis	1	100%	0.53	10.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.7%Headshot accuracy

34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.4%Spray accuracy

64.0%Counter-strafing

12.7°Preaim

579msReaction time

37.1%T opening success

39.6%CT opening success

0.30Enemies flashed / flash

2.3%Flash assists

5.95HE damage / grenade

3.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.
Preaim 12.6652° — above the 12° mark we flag
Aim Training →
Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 12.6809% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3027 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	8–8	-0.02	10%	4 Nov →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	21%	4 Nov →
mirage	12–12	0.01	28%	4 Nov →
mirage	13–2	-0.00	25%	4 Nov →
mirage	12–12	0.03	17%	4 Nov →
mirage	3–13	-0.06	25%	4 Nov →
ancient	11–13	-0.05	11%	4 Nov →
inferno	9–13	-0.09	13%	4 Nov →
mirage	0–13	-0.07	11%	4 Nov →
mirage	13–6	-0.06	4%	4 Nov →
nuke	13–0	0.01	5%	3 Nov →
inferno	9–13	-0.05	10%	3 Nov →
anubis	6–13	0.02	11%	3 Nov →
nuke	13–10	0.00	19%	3 Nov →
nuke	13–2	0.07	10%	2 Nov →
nuke	9–13	-0.01	8%	2 Nov →
anubis	10–13	0.06	13%	1 Nov →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	7%	31 Oct →
dust2	4–13	-0.05	16%	31 Oct →
anubis	8–13	-0.04	11%	31 Oct →
anubis	15–15	-0.07	12%	31 Oct →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	8%	31 Oct →
dust2	13–10	-0.03	13%	31 Oct →
anubis	13–3	0.02	12%	31 Oct →
dust2	13–1	0.03	15%	31 Oct →
anubis	10–13	-0.05	16%	26 Oct →
inferno	9–3	-0.08	0%	26 Oct →
nuke	13–11	-0.10	8%	26 Oct →
mirage	8–13	0.01	15%	26 Oct →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	8%	26 Oct →
anubis	10–13	-0.07	9%	26 Oct →
ancient	13–9	-0.04	4%	23 Oct →
anubis	1–13	-0.01	19%	21 Oct →
anubis	13–2	-0.07	7%	21 Oct →
anubis	1–13	-0.01	13%	21 Oct →
anubis	13–5	-0.00	17%	21 Oct →
inferno	13–3	-0.05	4%	20 Oct →
anubis	13–6	0.03	15%	19 Oct →
dust2	13–4	-0.02	11%	19 Oct →
inferno	2–9	-0.20	24%	16 Oct →
nuke	4–9	-0.13	0%	15 Oct →
nuke	10–13	-0.07	9%	15 Oct →
cache	2–10	-0.09	11%	14 Oct →
inferno	6–9	-0.02	5%	14 Oct →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	8%	14 Oct →
cache	13–4	-0.02	4%	14 Oct →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	23%	14 Oct →
anubis	11–13	-0.04	10%	14 Oct →
nuke	9–4	0.01	33%	14 Oct →
nuke	9–5	-0.03	57%	14 Oct →
inferno	9–6	0.08	35%	14 Oct →
inferno	5–9	-0.17	18%	14 Oct →
nuke	9–7	0.08	14%	14 Oct →
inferno	9–5	0.20	24%	14 Oct →
inferno	8–8	-0.04	23%	14 Oct →
inferno	9–1	0.34	37%	14 Oct →
inferno	9–4	0.08	33%	14 Oct →
nuke	9–0	0.28	29%	14 Oct →
dust2	1–13	-0.11	0%	13 Oct →
nuke	13–9	0.02	11%	13 Oct →
inferno	13–9	-0.04	14%	13 Oct →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	8%	13 Oct →
anubis	13–9	-0.03	8%	12 Oct →
mirage	13–10	-0.06	13%	12 Oct →
cache	13–2	0.10	17%	12 Oct →
anubis	9–13	-0.01	8%	12 Oct →
nuke	13–9	-0.11	3%	11 Oct →
nuke	6–13	-0.10	9%	11 Oct →
mirage	9–13	-0.05	10%	11 Oct →
ancient	13–5	0.00	5%	11 Oct →
dust2	1–13	-0.08	18%	11 Oct →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	13%	11 Oct →
nuke	9–4	-0.05	8%	10 Oct →
ancient	2–4	-0.02	0%	10 Oct →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	18%	10 Oct →
cache	15–15	0.03	10%	10 Oct →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	15%	10 Oct →
nuke	13–2	0.09	10%	10 Oct →
nuke	16–13	0.04	16%	10 Oct →
nuke	8–13	-0.07	32%	9 Oct →
anubis	8–13	-0.01	13%	9 Oct →
dust2	9–13	0.02	11%	9 Oct →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	14%	9 Oct →
nuke	6–13	-0.08	13%	9 Oct →
ancient	16–12	-0.02	11%	9 Oct →
dust2	13–8	-0.04	11%	9 Oct →
mirage	5–13	-0.07	9%	9 Oct →
dust2	13–7	0.01	14%	9 Oct →
mirage	7–13	0.01	6%	9 Oct →
mirage	13–6	0.05	10%	9 Oct →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	13%	9 Oct →
mirage	2–5	-0.04	15%	9 Oct →
anubis	5–1	-0.02	0%	9 Oct →
nuke	13–11	-0.03	12%	9 Oct →
italy	3–13	-0.10	7%	9 Oct →
nuke	11–13	-0.06	10%	8 Oct →
anubis	13–4	-0.09	0%	8 Oct →
inferno	6–9	0.01	19%	8 Oct →
anubis	13–9	-0.06	14%	8 Oct →
nuke	4–13	-0.05	12%	8 Oct →