JayyCatt — CS2 Stats

76561199097981173[U:1:1137715445]

171Tracked matches48%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.5 Learning
FaceitLevel 1 · 364 ELOTop 100.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJayyCattFACEITLevel 1 · 364 ELOSTANDINGTop 100.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning36
Utility9

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45541Last 10045%Win rateLWWWWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.2
Aggression2.6
Utility0.9
Positioning3.6
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 68% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 38% on CT to 17% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 690ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning3.6
Utility0.9
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact4.4

Composite 3.5/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time698ms−4ms
first ⅓ avg 703ms → last ⅓ avg 698ms
Headshot accuracy11.1%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 11.0% → last ⅓ avg 11.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — ancient 13–5
130Biggest win — nuke
6Longest win streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 54% over 13mirageWeakest map · 32% over 28
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB30141647%-0.03
mirageD2891932%-0.03
dust2B158753%-0.03
nukeB137654%-0.03
infernoB84450%-0.03
overpassC52340%-0.03
anubis110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 28). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

113Matches
44%Win rate
0.81Avg K/D
61.2ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3438%0.8711.9
Ancient2945%0.9011.2
Dust21753%0.7412.2
Inferno1155%0.7812.2
Nuke1030%0.5810.1
Cache667%0.629.3
Overpass425%0.7312.0
Train250%1.2211.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.1%Headshot accuracy
37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.8%Spray accuracy
78.9%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
690msReaction time
16.7%T opening success
38.1%CT opening success
0.12Enemies flashed / flash
0.7%Flash assists
5.76HE damage / grenade
0.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.1079% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.1209 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 16.6668% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 28 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage7–13-0.073%11 Jul
nuke13–00.1115%11 Jul
dust213–8-0.0315%11 Jul
ancient13–7-0.014%23 Jun
dust216–14-0.0117%23 Jun
mirage13–20.064%28 May
dust213–4-0.0325%27 May
ancient10–13-0.0210%27 May
mirage14–16-0.069%17 May
dust213–16-0.0212%13 May
nuke14–16-0.028%12 May
mirage13–7-0.1017%11 May
nuke4–13-0.0717%7 May
mirage8–13-0.1210%5 May
ancient13–6-0.087%5 May
ancient6–13-0.0612%5 May
nuke10–13-0.026%1 May
mirage15–15-0.0515%1 May
ancient7–13-0.0315%14 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0810%14 Apr
ancient13–6-0.058%14 Apr
nuke13–9-0.039%10 Apr
ancient9–13-0.028%10 Apr
nuke13–6-0.028%9 Apr
ancient13–1-0.0512%9 Apr
nuke13–9-0.0510%8 Apr
mirage9–13-0.084%8 Apr
ancient13–4-0.0621%8 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0415%7 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0911%7 Apr
mirage13–70.0713%5 Apr
overpass13–5-0.039%5 Apr
overpass13–11-0.059%3 Apr
mirage13–3-0.0314%3 Apr
overpass6–130.0128%2 Apr
dust213–11-0.0110%1 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0110%27 Mar
ancient13–7-0.072%27 Mar
mirage10–130.0315%26 Mar
mirage4–130.0214%26 Mar
mirage13–80.028%26 Mar
ancient13–11-0.0214%10 Sept
ancient13–7-0.0223%10 Sept
ancient13–00.066%10 Sept
mirage2–13-0.017%7 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0110%7 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0612%28 Aug
mirage13–10.0319%27 Aug
mirage13–6-0.025%27 Aug
ancient9–13-0.027%27 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0910%26 Aug
ancient13–50.078%26 Aug
mirage5–13-0.018%26 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0110%25 Aug
ancient15–19-0.067%25 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0223%22 Aug
ancient10–13-0.055%22 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0214%22 Aug
ancient10–13-0.123%22 Aug
overpass13–16-0.0410%19 Aug
ancient12–160.0116%19 Aug
mirage4–13-0.055%11 Aug
overpass6–13-0.0514%11 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0516%5 Aug
ancient13–80.0613%5 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0111%1 Aug
ancient14–16-0.072%31 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0624%27 Feb
dust210–13-0.0313%19 Feb
mirage8–13-0.039%12 Feb
nuke4–13-0.063%11 Feb
nuke0–8-0.076%30 Jan
nuke19–17-0.0211%23 Jan
inferno10–13-0.069%16 Jan
dust26–13-0.058%14 Dec
ancient13–16-0.099%12 Dec
inferno8–13-0.0713%11 Dec
ancient13–8-0.064%10 Sept
mirage13–70.0416%10 Sept
mirage16–130.059%29 Aug
ancient7–13-0.088%29 Aug
dust211–13-0.0127%29 Aug
ancient5–13-0.032%28 Aug
dust213–8-0.0611%28 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0213%28 Aug
dust216–19-0.029%27 Aug
mirage3–13-0.166%22 Aug
ancient9–13-0.073%22 Aug
dust21–11-0.0811%22 Aug
dust213–90.0015%21 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0316%21 Aug
ancient14–16-0.097%20 Aug
dust213–50.0110%20 Aug
dust28–13-0.076%20 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0420%20 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0014%18 Aug
ancient13–50.1216%18 Aug
dust212–11-0.0512%18 Aug
ancient13–80.0113%14 Aug
anubis13–5-0.0212%14 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →