RBBaba — CS2 Stats

76561199093080670[U:1:1132814942]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,634Tracked matches48%Win rate2023Tracked since

2,406Hours in CS35Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingClutch Specialist

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Aug 2026 (32 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+71Tracked matches · now 2,634

+5.1ppWin rate · 42.9% → 48.0%

Rating over time

25Days played since 2026-08-19

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

Metric	Last 30	Previous 30	Change
Matches	102	—	—
Win rate	44%	—	—
K/D	0.79	—	—
Headshot %	47%	—	—

Measured 30 Aug 2026 → 1 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,636), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 5 median	Level 6 median	vs Level 6
Headshot rate	50.6%	43.8%	44.8%	above
Shot accuracy	2.4%	12.0%	12.4%	10.1% short
Kill/death ratio	0.99	1.02	1.03	0.04 short
Match win rate	46.2%	44.7%	45.2%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64

Positioning48

Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD41–47–12Last 10041%Win rateLWTWLTLTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −3.0pp headshot accuracy · −123ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

2–2–1 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 20%
Avg reaction 622ms

Last 10

3–4–3 · 30% win rate
Avg rating -0.04
Avg headshot accuracy 18%
Avg reaction 560ms

Last 20

8–8–4 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.04
Avg headshot accuracy 20%
Avg reaction 621ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+3.4 against its own average).

Aim6.4

Utility5.2

Positioning4.8

Opening Duels1.7

Clutch8.4

Strong CT-side openerReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 615ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4

Positioning4.8

Utility5.2

Mechanics5.7

Opening Duels3.5

Win Impact4.3

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time611ms+18ms

first ⅓ avg 594ms → last ⅓ avg 611ms

Headshot accuracy17.8%+1.4%

first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–1 · nuke, 5 Sept →

33%Best headshot accuracy · 7–4 · vertigo, 1 Sept →

406msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · vertigo, 25 Aug →

13–0Biggest win · overpass, 19 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak

8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

1Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 57% over 21mirageWeakest map · 0% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	A	21	12–9	57%	-0.01
office	C	18	7–11	39%	-0.02
cache	D	12	4–8	33%	-0.01
vertigo	B	8	4–4	50%	-0.03
inferno	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.02
dust2	B	6	3–3	50%	-0.01
ancient	C	5	2–3	40%	-0.03
mirage	D	5	0–5	0%	-0.03
train	—	4	0–4	0%	-0.03
anubis	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.00
shelter	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.00
italy	—	3	1–2	33%	0.02
overpass	—	2	2–0	100%	0.04
fachwerk	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.00
boulder	—	1	0–1	0%	0.01
debris	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

50,807Lifetime kills

0.99K/D

3,261Matches

46.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players

50.6%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 5 players

2.4%Shot accuracy

6,292MVPs

1,158Hours (in match)

1,998Bombs planted

650Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4718,744

M4A4 / M4A1-S9,628

P2000 / USP-S3,178

AWP2,915

MP92,393

Galil AR2,207

Desert Eagle2,090

Glock-182,084

FAMAS1,565

MAC-101,290

Lifetime map wins

5,635dust2

4,086inferno

3,652nuke

1,862office

1,438vertigo

940train

178italy

51cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

13Matches

62%Win rate

0.77Avg K/D

77.2ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

62%1v1 clutch win

40%1v2 clutch win

3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	4	75%	0.91	11.5
Dust2	3	67%	1.02	14.3
Inferno	3	67%	0.68	10.3
Nuke	1	0%	0.40	6.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.6%Headshot accuracy

34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

34.8%Spray accuracy

75.8%Counter-strafing

9.6°Preaim

615msReaction time

43.3%T opening success

45.1%CT opening success

0.52Enemies flashed / flash

6.1%Flash assists

7.96HE damage / grenade

13.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	2–13	0.01	14%	1 Oct →
nuke	13–2	-0.07	27%	1 Oct →
inferno	12–12	-0.07	16%	1 Oct →
dust2	13–2	0.01	21%	1 Oct →
ancient	5–13	-0.01	19%	1 Oct →
office	12–12	-0.08	18%	29 Sept →
shelter	3–7	-0.09	6%	29 Sept →
train	12–12	-0.05	25%	29 Sept →
nuke	13–10	-0.01	22%	29 Sept →
cache	4–13	-0.05	14%	29 Sept →
nuke	15–15	-0.05	4%	27 Sept →
nuke	7–13	-0.05	28%	27 Sept →
office	13–2	0.01	24%	25 Sept →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	11%	25 Sept →
italy	13–1	-0.08	26%	23 Sept →
nuke	13–6	0.06	26%	23 Sept →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	13%	23 Sept →
cache	1–13	-0.06	29%	23 Sept →
office	11–13	-0.03	19%	23 Sept →
vertigo	13–11	-0.05	32%	23 Sept →
ancient	3–13	-0.03	6%	22 Sept →
inferno	13–4	0.05	19%	21 Sept →
dust2	13–3	-0.01	12%	21 Sept →
cache	13–10	0.00	23%	21 Sept →
nuke	5–13	-0.07	7%	21 Sept →
train	5–13	0.04	16%	21 Sept →
train	8–13	0.00	12%	20 Sept →
anubis	13–8	0.01	21%	20 Sept →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	27%	20 Sept →
nuke	12–12	0.00	22%	20 Sept →
ancient	13–10	-0.05	8%	20 Sept →
nuke	7–13	-0.00	8%	9 Sept →
fachwerk	7–13	-0.00	13%	9 Sept →
boulder	7–13	0.01	16%	9 Sept →
office	12–12	-0.02	17%	9 Sept →
office	11–13	0.00	14%	7 Sept →
inferno	7–13	-0.03	7%	7 Sept →
cache	10–13	0.04	18%	7 Sept →
vertigo	10–13	-0.03	13%	7 Sept →
office	12–12	-0.05	13%	6 Sept →
vertigo	13–6	-0.05	15%	6 Sept →
office	13–5	0.03	17%	6 Sept →
train	4–13	-0.09	9%	6 Sept →
ancient	13–5	0.01	17%	6 Sept →
nuke	13–10	-0.05	15%	6 Sept →
nuke	13–9	-0.01	13%	6 Sept →
inferno	13–11	-0.07	18%	6 Sept →
office	6–13	-0.11	15%	5 Sept →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	7%	5 Sept →
nuke	13–1	0.15	17%	5 Sept →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	28%	5 Sept →
office	13–7	-0.05	20%	5 Sept →
mirage	7–13	-0.00	16%	5 Sept →
nuke	13–4	0.06	18%	4 Sept →
ancient	8–13	-0.05	28%	4 Sept →
office	5–13	-0.05	13%	4 Sept →
vertigo	12–12	0.02	18%	4 Sept →
debris	9–7	-0.12	16%	4 Sept →
office	0–5	-0.15	20%	2 Sept →
inferno	13–8	0.01	24%	2 Sept →
cache	4–13	-0.06	17%	1 Sept →
shelter	6–13	0.01	11%	1 Sept →
vertigo	7–4	-0.05	33%	1 Sept →
office	10–13	-0.04	21%	1 Sept →
shelter	13–2	0.08	18%	1 Sept →
nuke	13–8	-0.05	14%	1 Sept →
dust2	13–7	0.01	15%	30 Aug →
vertigo	12–12	-0.02	17%	30 Aug →
cache	12–12	0.01	12%	30 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.03	12%	30 Aug →
cache	13–3	-0.02	16%	29 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.08	10%	28 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.01	13%	28 Aug →
office	4–13	0.01	23%	28 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.02	14%	28 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.05	9%	28 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.04	14%	27 Aug →
office	13–11	-0.04	28%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.04	15%	26 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.11	13%	26 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	13%	26 Aug →
office	13–11	0.01	24%	25 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.01	9%	25 Aug →
vertigo	3–13	-0.12	6%	25 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.01	12%	24 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.04	17%	24 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.03	20%	24 Aug →
office	13–11	0.00	14%	24 Aug →
office	13–5	0.00	10%	23 Aug →
italy	10–13	0.00	6%	23 Aug →
office	2–6	0.10	13%	23 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.01	22%	23 Aug →
vertigo	13–11	0.04	20%	21 Aug →
nuke	12–12	-0.06	29%	21 Aug →
overpass	13–5	0.02	19%	21 Aug →
italy	7–10	0.14	24%	21 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.08	24%	19 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	26%	19 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.00	23%	19 Aug →
overpass	13–0	0.05	15%	19 Aug →