TramFreak88

TramFreak88 — CS2 Stats

AU76561199093071239[U:1:1132805511]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

6,199Tracked matches48%Win rate2023Tracked since
5,283Hours in CS36Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating24,908Top 25% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#22750 of 251228 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+503Premier CS Rating · 24,405 → 24,908

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,908 +1,088 29 Aug – 11 Oct · 13 days played
23,31924,908peak 24,90829 Aug11 Oct
24,908Peak Premier in tracked matches
18Days played since 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 24,908
  • +1,063 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 92 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches116——
Win rate58%——
K/D1.21——
Headshot %44%——

Measured 11 Sep 2026 → 11 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,879), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate45.0%44.8%45.7%meets
Shot accuracy0.8%12.4%12.7%11.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.321.031.05above
Match win rate54.2%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTramFreak88FACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER24,908 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning57
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58–36–6Last 10058%Win rateLWWWLLWWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −5.5pp headshot accuracy · −25ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 492ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility7.0
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 68% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Flashes. 0.83 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 68% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning5.7
Utility7.0
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact4.4

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time529ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 530ms → last ⅓ avg 529ms
Headshot accuracy17.5%+3.0%
first ⅓ avg 14.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–1 · dust2, 18 Sept →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · nuke, 4 Oct →
359msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · inferno, 26 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 9 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
6–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 8anubisWeakest map · 50% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B3317–1652%0.02
mirageS1510–567%-0.01
infernoB137–654%0.00
ancientS107–370%0.02
anubisB105–550%0.01
cacheS86–275%0.02
nukeS75–271%0.04
train—31–233%0.03
vertigo—10–10%-0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

119,000Lifetime kills
1.32K/D · Top 10% of Level 6 players
6,435Matches
54.2%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 6 players
45.0%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 6 players
0.8%Shot accuracy
17,864MVPs
2,360Hours (in match)
6,151Bombs planted
1,903Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4756,778
MP93,134
FAMAS1,774
AWP1,683
HE Grenade1,128

Lifetime map wins

16,167dust2
9,419inferno
6,607nuke
4,210vertigo
2,925train
132office
33cbble
12italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

73Matches
55%Win rate
1.43Avg K/D
94.5ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1937%1.2616.5
Dust21878%1.4017.7
Ancient1060%1.7618.2
Vertigo850%1.3217.4
Inferno862%1.2817.1
Anubis450%2.0422.3
Nuke333%1.7418.0
Cache250%0.9315.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.0%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.5%Spray accuracy
88.8%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
531msReaction time
24.8%T opening success
67.7%CT opening success
0.83Enemies flashed / flash
8.6%Flash assists
9.25HE damage / grenade
11.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.7878% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust24–13-0.059%11 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0514%11 Oct →
mirage13–20.0112%11 Oct →
ancient13–100.0422%11 Oct →
dust28–130.0013%11 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.007%10 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0213%10 Oct →
dust213–60.0131%10 Oct →
anubis15–150.0510%10 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0518%10 Oct →
inferno12–120.0316%10 Oct →
train10–80.0714%10 Oct →
vertigo3–13-0.1118%10 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0015%10 Oct →
ancient13–10.0019%9 Oct →
train7–130.0225%9 Oct →
ancient11–130.0717%9 Oct →
cache13–80.0616%4 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0143%4 Oct →
dust27–130.0620%4 Oct →
inferno0–6-0.0633%4 Oct →
mirage13–70.0216%3 Oct →
mirage13–2-0.0610%3 Oct →
dust212–120.0225%3 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0413%3 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0116%3 Oct →
inferno13–70.0412%3 Oct →
cache13–90.0117%2 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0016%2 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0213%2 Oct →
dust29–130.0916%2 Oct →
dust213–110.0116%2 Oct →
dust213–80.0822%2 Oct →
dust213–80.0622%2 Oct →
inferno13–40.0611%1 Oct →
dust211–130.0311%1 Oct →
dust213–80.0118%1 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0626%1 Oct →
dust213–90.0416%27 Sept →
nuke13–100.0618%27 Sept →
inferno12–12-0.058%27 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0743%27 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0112%26 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0033%26 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0413%26 Sept →
inferno8–130.0017%26 Sept →
dust213–80.0123%26 Sept →
mirage13–110.0213%26 Sept →
inferno13–60.0121%22 Sept →
dust26–1-0.009%22 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0311%22 Sept →
inferno13–100.0527%22 Sept →
inferno0–13-0.110%20 Sept →
nuke13–40.0319%20 Sept →
dust213–50.1422%20 Sept →
nuke13–50.1026%19 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0910%19 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0112%19 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0619%19 Sept →
inferno6–20.0317%19 Sept →
anubis12–120.0810%19 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0213%18 Sept →
mirage6–1-0.027%18 Sept →
cache13–10.0133%18 Sept →
dust213–60.0521%18 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0313%18 Sept →
cache13–40.0923%18 Sept →
cache1–13-0.0115%18 Sept →
dust20–13-0.060%18 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0314%18 Sept →
dust213–10.1715%18 Sept →
cache13–70.0323%18 Sept →
anubis13–60.0617%18 Sept →
nuke13–70.0423%18 Sept →
dust213–30.1115%18 Sept →
mirage12–120.148%18 Sept →
anubis5–130.0712%18 Sept →
dust26–130.1111%18 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0212%18 Sept →
nuke11–130.0519%17 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0013%17 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0013%17 Sept →
ancient13–80.0815%17 Sept →
train13–20.0010%17 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0912%17 Sept →
mirage11–3-0.0312%17 Sept →
dust213–30.0613%17 Sept →
dust213–50.0614%16 Sept →
mirage11–60.0227%13 Sept →
inferno13–40.0714%13 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.0327%13 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0117%13 Sept →
dust213–30.024%13 Sept →
ancient10–130.0514%13 Sept →
anubis13–70.0118%12 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.008%12 Sept →
cache16–14-0.0214%12 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0118%12 Sept →
mirage13–40.0113%12 Sept →
ancient13–90.0116%11 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.