Leif2k

Leif2k — CS2 Stats

NO76561199086067500[U:1:1125801772]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,127Tracked matches61%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,673Hours in CS12Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating17,307Purple band · top ~19.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,646 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 17,307 → 17,307
0Faceit ELO · 1,646 → 1,646
+5Tracked matches · now 1,127
−3.6ppWin rate · 64.3% → 60.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 46 days played since 3 Dec 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,307 +3,456 3 Dec13 Sept · 13 days played
12,58517,482peak 17,4823 Dec13 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,646 +0 5 Sept13 Sept · 2 observations
1,6461,646peak 1,6465 Sept13 Sept
17,482Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,646Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2025-12-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,646
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 105 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-05
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-05

Premier CS Rating

  • 175 below peak (17,482)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,693 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-05
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,086), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate56.0%46.8%48.3%above
Shot accuracy15.8%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.941.061.070.13 short
Match win rate42.1%46.3%46.9%4.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLeif2kFACEITLevel 8 · 1,646 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER17,307 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,646csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning49
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56395Last 10056%Win rateLLWWWTTLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · +105ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 752ms

Last 10

  • 532 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 685ms

Last 20

  • 1082 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility4.7
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 606ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning4.9
Utility4.7
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact8.6

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time606ms−92ms
first ⅓ avg 698ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms
Headshot accuracy15.2%−3.8%
first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 15.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 9–3 · poseidon, 31 May
36%Best headshot accuracy · 9–3 · poseidon, 31 May
438msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · nuke, 25 Aug
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 24 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
147In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 79% over 14nukeWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisA159660%-0.01
ancientS1411379%0.01
mirageB136746%-0.00
nukeD134931%-0.01
cacheA116555%-0.03
dust2S107370%-0.03
infernoB105550%0.00
vertigoS86275%-0.04
overpass31233%0.02
train2020%-0.07
poseidon110100%0.15

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

44,934Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
2,365Matches
42.1%Match win rate
56.0%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players
15.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
6,100MVPs
831Hours (in match)
2,434Bombs planted
523Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,229inferno
2,199vertigo
1,722nuke
1,207dust2
937train
844cbble
227lake
120office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

644Matches
52%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
73.4ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage11547%0.9014.3
Ancient10459%0.9013.3
Anubis8452%0.9513.8
Vertigo5562%0.9313.9
Nuke4753%0.9615.6
Dust24639%0.8614.5
Inferno2952%0.9815.4
Train1369%0.7813.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy
37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.7%Spray accuracy
72.6%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
606msReaction time
33.9%T opening success
34.8%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
3.3%Flash assists
5.80HE damage / grenade
6.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.8672% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis8–13-0.0716%13 Sept
cache9–13-0.0215%13 Sept
dust213–8-0.0119%11 Sept
mirage13–9-0.079%8 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0212%8 Sept
anubis15–15-0.0114%8 Sept
nuke15–15-0.0313%8 Sept
cache10–13-0.0216%7 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0023%6 Sept
vertigo13–9-0.0517%6 Sept
cache9–13-0.0314%6 Sept
mirage13–70.0221%3 Sept
dust213–10-0.0429%3 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0114%2 Sept
dust213–8-0.0514%1 Sept
vertigo13–16-0.0815%1 Sept
ancient13–60.0514%1 Sept
inferno7–130.0021%1 Sept
nuke13–110.0514%1 Sept
vertigo11–13-0.116%31 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0615%31 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0416%31 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0419%30 Aug
dust213–10-0.0212%28 Aug
inferno10–130.0022%27 Aug
dust25–13-0.106%27 Aug
anubis13–30.0410%26 Aug
vertigo13–11-0.0118%26 Aug
dust213–50.0720%25 Aug
nuke13–100.0318%25 Aug
vertigo13–7-0.0115%25 Aug
dust213–7-0.049%24 Aug
nuke4–13-0.069%24 Aug
cache13–9-0.0617%24 Aug
mirage13–20.0725%24 Aug
cache10–13-0.0713%23 Aug
ancient13–90.0617%23 Aug
inferno8–130.0020%23 Aug
cache13–7-0.0210%22 Aug
ancient13–80.0014%22 Aug
vertigo16–140.0115%21 Aug
ancient16–13-0.0016%20 Aug
mirage13–160.0113%19 Aug
vertigo13–11-0.0319%18 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0021%18 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0310%18 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0613%17 Aug
inferno13–30.0512%16 Aug
cache16–140.0315%12 Aug
anubis5–130.0019%11 Aug
inferno10–130.0217%11 Aug
ancient13–70.1515%11 Aug
cache13–90.0123%11 Aug
anubis13–70.0517%11 Aug
anubis14–160.0416%11 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0524%10 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0122%6 Aug
nuke12–16-0.0117%6 Aug
anubis13–2-0.0519%5 Aug
cache11–13-0.0723%5 Aug
vertigo13–4-0.0317%5 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0122%4 Aug
ancient13–60.027%4 Aug
dust26–13-0.0911%4 Aug
ancient13–110.0517%4 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0911%2 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0323%2 Aug
dust213–20.0328%2 Aug
anubis9–130.0126%2 Aug
mirage9–130.0126%9 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0222%9 Jul
cache13–100.0315%9 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0119%31 May
anubis13–9-0.0210%31 May
poseidon9–30.1536%31 May
cache13–7-0.0731%16 May
inferno13–90.0128%19 Feb
inferno13–30.0516%15 Feb
nuke3–13-0.049%5 Feb
ancient13–90.0620%5 Feb
anubis13–11-0.0315%25 Jan
mirage13–110.0226%24 Jan
nuke13–11-0.0225%24 Jan
mirage8–130.0331%24 Jan
nuke6–130.0512%22 Jan
anubis10–130.0125%22 Jan
nuke13–100.0222%18 Jan
dust29–13-0.0218%17 Jan
inferno13–5-0.0118%17 Jan
mirage2–13-0.0610%17 Jan
overpass9–60.0720%13 Dec
nuke8–8-0.0316%13 Dec
ancient13–9-0.0817%10 Dec
train5–13-0.099%5 Dec
mirage11–13-0.0024%4 Dec
overpass15–15-0.028%4 Dec
overpass7–130.0123%3 Dec
nuke11–13-0.044%3 Dec
train6–13-0.054%3 Dec
inferno9–13-0.0713%3 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →