abiraju

abiraju — CS2 Stats

BS76561199082242873[U:1:1121977145]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,312Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
11,093Hours in CS62Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 4,260 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 4,260 → 4,260
+22Tracked matches · now 3,312
0.0ppWin rate · 50.0% → 50.0%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 4,260 +0 28 Aug – 20 Sept · 6 observations
4,2604,260peak 4,26028 Aug20 Sept
4,260Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-03-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 4,260
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Reached: 4,000 ELO · 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO
  • 4,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • 3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches57——
Win rate81%——
K/D1.27——
Headshot %53%——

Measured 20 Sep 2026 → 28 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches148——
Win rate78%——
K/D1.28——
Headshot %55%——

Measured 28 Aug 2026 → 28 Sep 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=29,129), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate61.4%50.9%
Shot accuracy14.3%13.8%
Kill/death ratio1.161.09
Match win rate65.7%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGabirajuFACEITLevel 10 · 4,260 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of ranked30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO4,260csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning50
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51–49Last 10051%Win rateWLLWWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +3.6pp headshot accuracy · −97ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 483ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 459ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility6.0
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 11.0° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning5.0
Utility6.0
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time529ms−8ms
first ⅓ avg 537ms → last ⅓ avg 529ms
Headshot accuracy22.9%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 21.1% → last ⅓ avg 22.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.27Best match rating · 9–0 · poseidon, 4 Aug →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · mirage, 11 Jun →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · nuke, 17 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 11 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
8–17In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 9ancientWeakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2311–1248%0.01
nukeC177–1041%0.02
mirageB179–853%0.01
ancientD155–1033%0.00
overpassA149–564%-0.00
anubisS96–367%0.01
inferno—21–150%0.02
poseidon—11–0100%0.27
cache—11–0100%0.01
shortdust—11–0100%0.16

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

288,293Lifetime kills
1.16K/D · Top 50% of Level 10 players
10,320Matches
65.7%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 10 players
61.4%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 10 players
14.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 10 players
60,608MVPs
7,082Hours (in match)
7,236Bombs planted
3,451Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47107,891
AWP25,407
MP98,902
Knife7,162
AUG3,413

Lifetime map wins

23,164dust2
9,504nuke
7,499inferno
6,016train
2,528vertigo
671cbble
46lake
36safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,050Matches
60%Win rate
1.32Avg K/D
86.9ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
19Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage85164%1.3318.0
Dust254263%1.3317.6
Anubis30564%1.2916.8
Ancient25757%1.4318.1
Nuke17863%1.3817.3
Train8257%1.3217.0
Overpass7655%1.3217.5
Inferno3554%1.3016.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.3%Headshot accuracy
41.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.8%Spray accuracy
83.7%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
532msReaction time
26.1%T opening success
47.3%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
6.90HE damage / grenade
11.96Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.1102% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–110.0133%25 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0817%25 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0123%25 Sept →
inferno13–30.0730%24 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0412%16 Sept →
anubis13–90.0315%2 Sept →
anubis13–90.0235%2 Sept →
nuke13–70.0538%17 Aug →
poseidon9–00.2733%4 Aug →
nuke4–130.0214%11 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0338%11 Jul →
mirage13–90.0520%11 Jul →
cache22–190.0121%7 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0111%7 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.0325%7 Jul →
overpass5–13-0.0323%17 Jun →
dust213–110.0115%17 Jun →
mirage11–130.0118%17 Jun →
anubis13–30.0728%16 Jun →
nuke11–130.0214%16 Jun →
dust211–130.0026%16 Jun →
mirage13–70.029%13 Jun →
overpass13–11-0.0419%13 Jun →
mirage13–10.1243%11 Jun →
dust213–90.0122%11 Jun →
overpass13–9-0.0213%9 Jun →
nuke6–13-0.0220%9 Jun →
dust27–130.0418%9 Jun →
dust214–16-0.0038%8 Jun →
ancient10–130.0216%8 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.0319%4 Jun →
overpass13–8-0.0116%4 Jun →
dust214–160.0533%4 Jun →
dust213–20.0321%27 May →
ancient4–13-0.0215%26 May →
mirage11–13-0.0518%26 May →
nuke9–130.0536%22 May →
mirage9–13-0.0127%22 May →
mirage2–13-0.0718%22 May →
nuke10–13-0.0120%22 May →
dust213–80.0123%22 May →
dust213–50.1137%21 May →
overpass13–100.0127%20 May →
nuke13–9-0.0224%20 May →
anubis16–14-0.0133%19 May →
mirage10–130.0212%19 May →
dust213–40.1027%19 May →
dust218–22-0.0222%18 May →
anubis6–13-0.067%18 May →
dust211–13-0.0729%2 May →
anubis13–110.0431%2 May →
ancient5–13-0.0836%2 May →
overpass13–20.0832%2 May →
nuke13–160.0441%2 May →
dust25–13-0.0119%2 May →
mirage13–100.0615%1 May →
overpass13–70.0120%1 May →
anubis13–4-0.0221%30 Apr →
ancient13–40.0524%30 Apr →
ancient1–100.0237%30 Apr →
anubis14–16-0.0118%30 Apr →
dust216–13-0.0111%30 Apr →
shortdust9–20.1614%28 Apr →
nuke5–13-0.0332%10 Apr →
ancient11–130.0115%10 Apr →
ancient13–10.0720%9 Apr →
dust26–13-0.0421%9 Apr →
dust210–130.0619%8 Apr →
overpass14–16-0.0224%8 Apr →
overpass11–13-0.0216%7 Apr →
dust27–13-0.0221%7 Apr →
ancient9–130.0226%7 Apr →
mirage13–10.0616%7 Apr →
ancient10–130.0320%5 Apr →
mirage13–100.0123%5 Apr →
overpass13–100.0217%5 Apr →
nuke11–13-0.0042%5 Apr →
mirage13–50.0316%5 Apr →
dust213–9-0.0229%3 Apr →
nuke13–20.0627%2 Apr →
nuke14–160.1116%2 Apr →
nuke13–80.0830%1 Apr →
ancient13–16-0.0213%1 Apr →
overpass13–40.0828%1 Apr →
overpass3–13-0.0425%1 Apr →
ancient11–13-0.0412%1 Apr →
mirage13–11-0.0316%31 Mar →
dust213–8-0.0122%31 Mar →
overpass2–13-0.0021%31 Mar →
ancient13–10.1124%30 Mar →
overpass13–11-0.0513%30 Mar →
dust210–13-0.059%30 Mar →
nuke11–13-0.0328%30 Mar →
dust216–130.0215%30 Mar →
nuke13–60.0522%29 Mar →
anubis11–130.0124%29 Mar →
dust213–110.0217%29 Mar →
ancient13–2-0.0412%29 Mar →
nuke16–13-0.0123%29 Mar →
ancient12–90.0130%28 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.