ReiskaPappa

ReiskaPappa — CS2 Stats

VA76561199080248591[U:1:1119982863]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,881Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,571Hours in CS24Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating19,440Top 50% of 204,793 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~10.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#90627 of 252068 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,440 +553 31 Aug – 12 Oct · 22 days played
18,02220,000peak 20,00031 Aug12 Oct
20,116Peak Premier in tracked matches
25Days played since 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 560 below peak (20,000)
  • -452 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 560 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,110), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate53.2%44.8%45.7%above
Shot accuracy12.5%12.4%12.7%0.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.211.031.05above
Match win rate44.3%45.2%45.7%1.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGReiskaPappaFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER19,440 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning57
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–48–2Last 10050%Win rateLWWLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −1.3pp headshot accuracy · +20ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 469ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 510ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim9.0
Utility6.2
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning5.7
Utility6.2
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels5.3
Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time537ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 551ms → last ⅓ avg 537ms
Headshot accuracy29.2%+3.4%
first ⅓ avg 25.8% → last ⅓ avg 29.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 9–0 · nuke, 8 Oct →
80%Best headshot accuracy · 2–9 · nuke, 24 Sept →
359msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · inferno, 25 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 3 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
6–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 64% over 14anubisWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB3619–1753%0.00
infernoC177–1041%0.02
mirageA149–564%0.03
cacheC125–742%0.00
anubisC104–640%0.04
dust2C73–443%-0.01
ancient—33–0100%0.08
eldorado—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

81,110Lifetime kills
1.21K/D · Top 25% of Level 6 players
3,931Matches
44.3%Match win rate
53.2%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 6 players
12.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 6 players
10,100MVPs
1,411Hours (in match)
3,143Bombs planted
1,352Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4729,055
AWP14,424
SSG 081,925
MP91,684
FAMAS1,232

Lifetime map wins

8,936inferno
8,253nuke
1,960train
1,701dust2
589vertigo
47lake
46ar_shoots
40safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

52Matches
54%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
89.0ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke1250%1.2517.5
Mirage1155%1.1816.2
Anubis729%0.8613.4
Inferno757%1.1018.6
Cache475%1.2118.0
Dust2367%1.1912.0
Ancient250%1.5620.5
Overpass2100%0.8210.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.0%Headshot accuracy
36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.8%Spray accuracy
84.1%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
523msReaction time
53.9%T opening success
48.8%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
11.4%Flash assists
9.68HE damage / grenade
8.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke6–130.0644%13 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0026%12 Oct →
mirage13–100.0326%12 Oct →
anubis7–130.0516%12 Oct →
cache13–160.0628%11 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0422%9 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0419%9 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0840%9 Oct →
ancient13–60.0327%9 Oct →
nuke13–30.0933%9 Oct →
inferno9–7-0.0022%9 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0142%9 Oct →
nuke13–70.0423%9 Oct →
dust213–100.0517%9 Oct →
dust210–130.0425%9 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0334%9 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0220%9 Oct →
nuke9–50.0238%8 Oct →
nuke9–00.2653%8 Oct →
nuke16–140.0020%5 Oct →
nuke13–70.0635%5 Oct →
mirage13–60.1118%5 Oct →
nuke10–7-0.0439%5 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0027%5 Oct →
nuke9–20.2431%5 Oct →
nuke9–20.1338%5 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0825%4 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0430%4 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0225%4 Oct →
anubis16–120.0241%3 Oct →
cache13–110.0228%3 Oct →
dust213–10.0329%3 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0321%3 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0638%3 Oct →
ancient13–50.1426%3 Oct →
anubis5–130.0725%3 Oct →
inferno5–130.0235%2 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0439%2 Oct →
nuke13–90.0622%27 Sept →
mirage13–50.1050%27 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0217%27 Sept →
cache13–90.0532%27 Sept →
inferno13–40.0522%27 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0439%25 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0247%24 Sept →
mirage13–90.0347%24 Sept →
inferno9–30.2227%24 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0122%24 Sept →
nuke7–9-0.0841%24 Sept →
nuke2–9-0.1480%24 Sept →
nuke9–60.0336%24 Sept →
nuke8–8-0.0238%24 Sept →
nuke3–9-0.1328%24 Sept →
nuke8–80.0142%24 Sept →
nuke6–9-0.1142%24 Sept →
nuke9–7-0.0413%24 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0537%23 Sept →
dust213–60.0225%23 Sept →
anubis13–70.0331%23 Sept →
nuke4–9-0.0810%17 Sept →
anubis13–160.0428%17 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0267%17 Sept →
mirage9–130.0231%16 Sept →
cache0–13-0.0210%16 Sept →
nuke13–50.0438%16 Sept →
mirage8–130.0231%16 Sept →
cache7–130.0150%14 Sept →
anubis6–130.1425%13 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0133%13 Sept →
cache13–100.0531%13 Sept →
inferno13–110.0831%13 Sept →
nuke16–120.0431%13 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0710%11 Sept →
nuke14–16-0.0120%9 Sept →
mirage13–50.0925%9 Sept →
inferno11–130.0326%9 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0131%7 Sept →
inferno9–130.0114%7 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0011%7 Sept →
nuke13–60.0323%7 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0017%5 Sept →
anubis13–40.1519%5 Sept →
mirage16–12-0.0133%5 Sept →
inferno13–30.0418%5 Sept →
mirage13–60.0835%5 Sept →
nuke13–80.0339%5 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0227%5 Sept →
ancient13–20.0930%5 Sept →
nuke6–130.0016%4 Sept →
inferno13–70.0526%2 Sept →
inferno7–130.0035%2 Sept →
cache13–4-0.0227%2 Sept →
nuke4–9-0.0836%2 Sept →
nuke3–9-0.0831%2 Sept →
nuke7–9-0.1242%2 Sept →
nuke1–13-0.058%1 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0113%1 Sept →
eldorado4–9-0.0312%1 Sept →
nuke7–130.0236%31 Aug →
mirage13–50.0741%31 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.