Noam

Noam — CS2 Stats

76561199074746017[U:1:1114480289]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

228Tracked matches63%Win rate2021Tracked since
313Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongPositional Player
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,642), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate46.4%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy12.0%12.0%12.4%0.4% short
Kill/death ratio1.181.021.03above
Match win rate55.2%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNoamFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning63
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT70–25–5Last 10070%Win rateLWWWWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +9.6pp headshot accuracy · +70ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 634ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 625ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility4.6
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels5.3
Clutch2.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 67% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 67% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 600ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.3
Utility4.6
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels5.4
Win Impact9.4

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time595ms−19ms
first ⅓ avg 614ms → last ⅓ avg 595ms
Headshot accuracy20.7%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 18.6% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 13–3 · nuke, 5 Sept →
48%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · mirage, 17 Sept →
445msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · cache, 1 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 15 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

11Longest win streak
8–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 82% over 22ancientWeakest map · 50% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2418–675%0.05
nukeS2218–482%0.05
ancientB168–850%0.02
infernoA117–464%0.04
anubisS107–370%0.03
cacheS96–367%0.06
dust2S86–275%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

8,925Lifetime kills
1.18K/D · Top 25% of Level 5 players
440Matches
55.2%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 5 players
46.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
12.0%Shot accuracy
1,181MVPs
175Hours (in match)
576Bombs planted
140Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

692dust2
631inferno
456nuke
80train
5lake
1safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

26Matches
58%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
81.8ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage838%1.1717.8
Dust2650%1.2417.8
Anubis450%1.1613.8
Cache3100%1.2618.7
Ancient367%1.0312.0
Nuke2100%1.8012.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.4%Headshot accuracy
40.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.9%Spray accuracy
85.6%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
600msReaction time
36.0%T opening success
66.9%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
9.20HE damage / grenade
6.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3935 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.9929% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient7–13-0.0432%26 Sept →
dust213–2-0.0417%26 Sept →
nuke13–80.1133%26 Sept →
mirage13–110.0615%26 Sept →
ancient13–110.0415%23 Sept →
inferno13–80.0423%17 Sept →
nuke5–130.0334%17 Sept →
ancient13–90.0124%17 Sept →
mirage13–100.0648%17 Sept →
ancient7–130.0228%17 Sept →
mirage3–130.0218%17 Sept →
mirage13–30.0717%16 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0520%16 Sept →
ancient13–30.0918%15 Sept →
nuke13–90.0519%15 Sept →
nuke13–0-0.019%15 Sept →
ancient3–130.0216%15 Sept →
mirage13–10.1032%15 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0210%15 Sept →
cache13–60.0814%15 Sept →
inferno0–7-0.0620%15 Sept →
mirage11–130.0117%13 Sept →
inferno13–60.1118%13 Sept →
nuke13–90.0523%13 Sept →
nuke13–20.1025%9 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0517%9 Sept →
nuke11–00.0718%8 Sept →
cache16–140.1219%8 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0217%7 Sept →
nuke13–30.2523%5 Sept →
ancient13–30.0612%5 Sept →
inferno13–10.0515%5 Sept →
mirage13–110.0419%5 Sept →
anubis12–120.0714%5 Sept →
mirage13–20.1319%4 Sept →
dust213–110.0926%4 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0118%4 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0618%4 Sept →
mirage13–90.0516%4 Sept →
ancient5–3-0.0310%4 Sept →
dust213–100.0320%3 Sept →
nuke13–100.0927%3 Sept →
inferno13–70.0820%3 Sept →
nuke11–130.0828%2 Sept →
mirage9–130.0224%2 Sept →
ancient12–120.0326%2 Sept →
dust213–80.0522%1 Sept →
ancient1–13-0.0321%1 Sept →
cache13–60.0317%1 Sept →
ancient13–40.1324%1 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0522%1 Sept →
nuke12–120.0318%1 Sept →
cache13–30.2223%1 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0313%1 Sept →
inferno13–90.1130%31 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0324%31 Aug →
cache11–00.0912%31 Aug →
mirage13–100.0920%31 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0125%31 Aug →
ancient13–4-0.0217%31 Aug →
mirage13–10.0613%30 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0214%30 Aug →
inferno13–70.1017%30 Aug →
nuke13–90.0023%30 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0123%29 Aug →
anubis13–100.0520%29 Aug →
dust213–50.0618%29 Aug →
nuke13–70.0110%29 Aug →
mirage12–12-0.029%28 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0314%28 Aug →
cache12–120.0417%28 Aug →
ancient10–130.1419%28 Aug →
nuke13–30.0616%28 Aug →
anubis13–3-0.0014%28 Aug →
mirage10–20.0320%28 Aug →
nuke13–50.0330%27 Aug →
anubis7–130.0517%26 Aug →
mirage13–70.0318%26 Aug →
nuke13–80.0111%26 Aug →
inferno6–130.0319%25 Aug →
mirage13–90.0322%25 Aug →
anubis13–50.0621%25 Aug →
mirage13–80.1212%25 Aug →
mirage8–9-0.0120%24 Aug →
inferno13–100.0816%23 Aug →
anubis11–10.0918%23 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0120%23 Aug →
mirage13–100.0721%23 Aug →
nuke13–50.0914%23 Aug →
nuke13–70.0227%23 Aug →
mirage13–100.0420%22 Aug →
cache10–130.0123%22 Aug →
anubis11–130.0231%22 Aug →
ancient13–80.0226%22 Aug →
dust213–50.0023%22 Aug →
mirage13–30.0615%22 Aug →
nuke13–0-0.019%22 Aug →
mirage13–90.1422%22 Aug →
nuke13–50.0721%22 Aug →
cache13–5-0.0420%22 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches11-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.